Ax 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		44	0.56	55	0.00	47	0.09	44	0.09	25	0.32	49	0.17
Ax 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bacha 1998		51	0.49	42	0.00	49	0.07	50	0.07	18	0.33	51	0.15
Barbosa 1983		38	0.61	64	0.00	41	0.11	36	0.11	11	0.42	41	0.21
BenOr 1989		24	0.66	16	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.29	12	0.56	27	0.40
Biret 1990		31	0.64	9	0.02	18	0.10	20	0.37	10	0.62	20	0.48
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.70	11	0.02	12	0.19	11	0.64	2	0.72	11	0.68
Chiu 1999		55	0.45	60	0.00	54	0.08	46	0.08	20	0.41	47	0.18
Clidat 1994		47	0.54	56	0.00	43	0.07	53	0.07	24	0.29	52	0.14
Cohen 1997		63	0.26	62	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	51	0.05	63	0.05
Cortot 1951		58	0.41	45	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	19	0.41	55	0.13
Csalog 1996		18	0.67	14	0.01	26	0.10	25	0.29	3	0.73	21	0.46
Czerny 1989		22	0.66	34	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.36	6	0.68	18	0.49
Ezaki 2006		25	0.66	22	0.00	25	0.08	30	0.24	9	0.55	30	0.36
Falvay 1989		3	0.75	6	0.07	5	0.33	2	0.80	3	0.65	7	0.72
Fiorentino 1962		2	0.75	7	0.05	4	0.23	3	0.80	3	0.81	2	0.80
Fliere 1977		41	0.60	8	0.04	21	0.11	24	0.34	3	0.53	25	0.42
Fou 1978		14	0.70	17	0.00	10	0.15	12	0.62	3	0.72	12	0.67
Francois 1956		48	0.53	27	0.00	42	0.06	56	0.06	17	0.35	53	0.14
Goldenweiser 1946		49	0.52	19	0.00	50	0.08	45	0.08	10	0.52	42	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.54	48	0.00	46	0.08	49	0.08	9	0.49	45	0.20
Groot 1988		12	0.70	12	0.01	11	0.18	13	0.62	1	0.72	13	0.67
Hatto 1993		23	0.66	32	0.00	28	0.09	23	0.34	16	0.53	26	0.42
Hatto 1997		32	0.64	57	0.00	33	0.12	35	0.12	21	0.44	36	0.23
Horszowski 1983		62	0.27	58	0.00	62	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.05	62	0.05
Indjic 2001		20	0.66	24	0.00	24	0.11	19	0.43	16	0.53	19	0.48
Katin 1996		15	0.70	46	0.00	14	0.16	14	0.58	6	0.69	14	0.63
Kiepura 1999		8	0.72	10	0.02	9	0.18	8	0.71	1	0.81	3	0.76
Korecka 1992		35	0.63	38	0.00	36	0.10	38	0.10	1	0.75	33	0.27
Kushner 1990		33	0.64	35	0.00	37	0.10	40	0.10	19	0.42	43	0.20
Lilamand 2001		60	0.39	61	0.00	61	0.06	55	0.06	22	0.27	54	0.13
Luisada 1990		30	0.64	63	0.00	39	0.16	33	0.16	15	0.61	31	0.31
Luisada 2008		43	0.58	65	0.00	44	0.06	54	0.06	25	0.45	50	0.16
Lushtak 2004		28	0.65	40	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.37	11	0.54	23	0.45
Malcuzynski 1951		1	0.77	1	0.28	1	0.28	1	0.83	3	0.79	1	0.81
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.73	15	0.01	7	0.19	5	0.74	4	0.66	9	0.70
Magaloff 1977		50	0.50	50	0.00	52	0.07	51	0.07	12	0.51	46	0.19
Magin 1975		19	0.67	52	0.00	29	0.11	29	0.27	12	0.55	28	0.39
Meguri 1997		53	0.48	29	0.00	53	0.10	39	0.10	20	0.39	44	0.20
Milkina 1970		21	0.66	21	0.00	15	0.15	15	0.58	16	0.44	17	0.51
Mohovich 1999		40	0.60	20	0.00	35	0.10	41	0.10	6	0.52	37	0.23
Nezu 2005		37	0.61	36	0.00	40	0.11	37	0.11	41	0.09	57	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		34	0.63	28	0.00	38	0.12	34	0.12	23	0.38	40	0.21
Olejniczak 1990		27	0.65	23	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.29	16	0.47	29	0.37
Osinska 1989		4	0.74	4	0.09	3	0.17	4	0.74	4	0.73	6	0.73
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.40	53	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	11	0.35	56	0.12
Poblocka 1999		29	0.65	47	0.00	34	0.10	42	0.10	16	0.57	35	0.24
Rangell 2001		56	0.43	30	0.00	59	0.06	57	0.06	44	0.05	64	0.05
Richter 1960		57	0.43	44	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	33	0.08	60	0.06
Richter 1961		61	0.35	25	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.04	65	0.04
Rosen 1989		16	0.69	37	0.00	17	0.16	17	0.55	2	0.71	15	0.62
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.63	41	0.00	19	0.12	26	0.29	11	0.63	24	0.43
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.72	2	0.16	2	0.17	6	0.74	2	0.77	5	0.75
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.73	5	0.08	6	0.30	7	0.73	2	0.78	4	0.75
Rudanovskaya 2007		52	0.48	39	0.00	51	0.08	47	0.08	2	0.63	38	0.22
Shebanova 2002		54	0.45	49	0.00	55	0.07	52	0.07	37	0.05	61	0.06
Smith 1975		10	0.71	18	0.00	13	0.17	10	0.66	2	0.77	8	0.71
Sztompka 1959		42	0.58	54	0.00	45	0.08	48	0.08	15	0.53	39	0.21
Tanyel 1992		17	0.67	31	0.00	20	0.11	18	0.50	21	0.42	22	0.46
Tsujii 2005		7	0.73	3	0.10	8	0.17	9	0.67	4	0.71	10	0.69
Uninsky 1959		11	0.71	13	0.01	16	0.15	16	0.57	6	0.65	16	0.61
Vardi 1988		39	0.60	33	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.19	21	0.42	32	0.28
Wasowski 1980		45	0.55	43	0.00	48	0.09	43	0.09	25	0.34	48	0.17
Zimerman 1975		26	0.66	26	0.00	31	0.10	31	0.24	24	0.31	34	0.27
Random 1		65	0.00	51	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	18	0.24	58	0.07
Random 2		66	-0.04	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	56	0.04	66	0.02
Random 3		64	0.00	59	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	22	0.23	59	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).