Brailowsky 1960

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.78	13	0.02	7	0.12	7	0.45	29	0.21	8	0.31
Ax 1995		24	0.72	23	0.01	35	0.06	41	0.06	52	0.06	45	0.06
Bacha 1998		49	0.62	45	0.00	46	0.04	56	0.04	40	0.06	48	0.05
Barbosa 1983		58	0.56	10	0.02	41	0.06	46	0.06	50	0.05	52	0.05
BenOr 1989		53	0.59	8	0.02	27	0.05	27	0.14	41	0.06	32	0.09
Biret 1990		16	0.74	21	0.01	17	0.07	17	0.28	31	0.16	14	0.21
Brailowsky 1960		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Chiu 1999		57	0.56	48	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04
Clidat 1994		13	0.75	41	0.00	12	0.19	13	0.34	37	0.07	18	0.15
Cohen 1997		56	0.57	65	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	29	0.19	30	0.09
Cortot 1951		64	0.41	39	0.00	64	0.05	47	0.05	26	0.20	26	0.10
Csalog 1996		25	0.72	59	0.00	37	0.08	35	0.08	35	0.07	37	0.07
Czerny 1989		41	0.66	47	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.06	43	0.06	44	0.06
Ezaki 2006		6	0.76	46	0.00	19	0.07	19	0.22	42	0.06	23	0.11
Falvay 1989		35	0.69	30	0.00	18	0.07	16	0.29	36	0.07	19	0.14
Fiorentino 1962		22	0.73	26	0.00	22	0.07	24	0.16	45	0.06	25	0.10
Fliere 1977		11	0.76	22	0.01	11	0.13	15	0.32	30	0.17	11	0.23
Fou 1978		43	0.65	15	0.01	45	0.04	53	0.04	55	0.05	60	0.04
Francois 1956		60	0.51	60	0.00	62	0.04	52	0.04	50	0.06	56	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		63	0.42	36	0.00	57	0.03	64	0.03	29	0.21	35	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.47	55	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	49	0.05	65	0.04
Groot 1988		31	0.70	9	0.02	29	0.08	23	0.17	41	0.05	33	0.09
Hatto 1993		21	0.73	57	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.10	60	0.04	46	0.06
Hatto 1997		19	0.73	56	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.12	56	0.04	39	0.07
Horszowski 1983		30	0.70	18	0.01	32	0.07	30	0.13	10	0.39	10	0.23
Indjic 2001		18	0.73	66	0.00	25	0.06	22	0.19	59	0.04	28	0.09
Katin 1996		36	0.68	20	0.01	49	0.07	38	0.07	64	0.04	49	0.05
Kiepura 1999		59	0.53	40	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.04
Korecka 1992		50	0.61	62	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	33	0.11	36	0.07
Kushner 1990		23	0.72	12	0.02	4	0.13	6	0.47	3	0.59	2	0.53
Lilamand 2001		54	0.58	19	0.01	53	0.06	45	0.06	61	0.04	53	0.05
Luisada 1990		46	0.63	17	0.01	28	0.05	21	0.19	28	0.16	15	0.17
Luisada 2008		48	0.62	49	0.00	44	0.05	50	0.05	36	0.06	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004		15	0.75	4	0.07	5	0.13	5	0.54	27	0.26	4	0.37
Malcuzynski 1951		10	0.76	27	0.00	8	0.19	10	0.42	28	0.21	9	0.30
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.71	6	0.04	2	0.16	8	0.44	23	0.24	6	0.32
Magaloff 1977		52	0.59	38	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	53	0.04	64	0.04
Magin 1975		34	0.69	25	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.07	50	0.05	43	0.06
Meguri 1997		62	0.44	32	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	60	0.04	63	0.04
Milkina 1970		9	0.76	44	0.00	20	0.06	20	0.20	44	0.05	24	0.10
Mohovich 1999		12	0.75	31	0.00	14	0.07	11	0.39	58	0.04	22	0.12
Nezu 2005		42	0.66	61	0.00	40	0.08	36	0.08	50	0.06	40	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.69	24	0.00	48	0.06	43	0.06	55	0.04	51	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		28	0.70	5	0.05	31	0.07	26	0.15	32	0.11	21	0.13
Osinska 1989		14	0.75	7	0.03	6	0.11	3	0.54	31	0.20	5	0.33
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.57	53	0.00	63	0.04	61	0.04	47	0.05	58	0.04
Poblocka 1999		17	0.73	42	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.07	38	0.06	41	0.06
Rangell 2001		8	0.76	29	0.00	15	0.08	12	0.37	37	0.07	17	0.16
Richter 1960		44	0.65	50	0.00	23	0.06	32	0.11	32	0.17	20	0.14
Richter 1961		37	0.68	52	0.00	21	0.08	25	0.15	41	0.06	27	0.09
Rosen 1989		7	0.76	54	0.00	16	0.10	14	0.33	17	0.32	7	0.32
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.70	33	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.06	53	0.05	47	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.67	11	0.02	13	0.09	29	0.13	49	0.06	34	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		33	0.69	34	0.00	26	0.06	34	0.09	59	0.05	38	0.07
Rudanovskaya 2007		51	0.60	51	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	39	0.06	55	0.05
Shebanova 2002		4	0.78	2	0.10	9	0.21	9	0.44	33	0.11	13	0.22
Smith 1975		38	0.67	35	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.07	50	0.05	42	0.06
Sztompka 1959		47	0.63	43	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	46	0.05	50	0.05
Tanyel 1992		2	0.80	1	0.35	1	0.35	2	0.63	5	0.47	1	0.54
Tsujii 2005		3	0.79	16	0.01	10	0.16	4	0.54	55	0.05	16	0.16
Uninsky 1959		40	0.67	58	0.00	47	0.04	54	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Vardi 1988		45	0.65	28	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	62	0.04	62	0.04
Wasowski 1980		26	0.72	14	0.01	24	0.08	18	0.22	6	0.61	3	0.37
Zimerman 1975		20	0.73	37	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.14	44	0.06	31	0.09
Average		1	0.82	3	0.08	3	0.16	1	0.68	34	0.08	12	0.23
Random 1		66	-0.09	64	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	43	0.04	66	0.03
Random 2		67	-0.14	63	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	64	0.02	67	0.01
Random 3		65	-0.04	67	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	11	0.43	29	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).