Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		43	0.67	15	0.01	17	0.08	19	0.17	55	0.05	39	0.09
Ax 1995		33	0.71	12	0.02	18	0.07	25	0.14	40	0.07	34	0.10
Bacha 1998		58	0.58	64	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.04	58	0.04
Barbosa 1983		61	0.50	31	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.06	32	0.13	36	0.09
BenOr 1989		57	0.59	32	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.06	27	0.22	25	0.11
Biret 1990		30	0.72	38	0.00	43	0.04	50	0.04	40	0.06	54	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.70	33	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.06	22	0.17	28	0.10
Chiu 1999		38	0.69	13	0.01	22	0.06	21	0.16	26	0.28	12	0.21
Clidat 1994		35	0.70	62	0.00	35	0.06	38	0.06	50	0.06	46	0.06
Cohen 1997		56	0.59	41	0.00	58	0.03	62	0.03	20	0.35	32	0.10
Cortot 1951		63	0.35	55	0.00	63	0.05	41	0.05	34	0.08	49	0.06
Csalog 1996		9	0.79	6	0.06	11	0.12	3	0.48	5	0.47	2	0.47
Czerny 1989		24	0.74	43	0.00	46	0.06	39	0.06	58	0.04	52	0.05
Ezaki 2006		10	0.79	8	0.05	14	0.09	12	0.25	36	0.07	19	0.13
Falvay 1989		5	0.80	3	0.09	3	0.15	2	0.51	14	0.39	3	0.45
Fiorentino 1962		32	0.71	25	0.01	21	0.06	28	0.13	41	0.07	33	0.10
Fliere 1977		39	0.68	54	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.06	38	0.07	44	0.06
Fou 1978		37	0.69	11	0.02	13	0.10	11	0.26	45	0.06	22	0.12
Francois 1956		31	0.71	17	0.01	6	0.10	8	0.32	19	0.44	5	0.38
Goldenweiser 1946		42	0.68	49	0.00	51	0.03	61	0.03	5	0.55	20	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.35	50	0.00	62	0.04	52	0.04	49	0.05	63	0.04
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		16	0.76	27	0.00	29	0.06	18	0.17	40	0.05	40	0.09
Hatto 1997		15	0.77	60	0.00	30	0.05	20	0.17	40	0.06	30	0.10
Horszowski 1983		25	0.73	58	0.00	55	0.04	54	0.04	40	0.06	51	0.05
Indjic 2001		13	0.77	30	0.00	28	0.06	17	0.18	38	0.06	31	0.10
Katin 1996		11	0.77	9	0.04	19	0.06	16	0.18	34	0.10	21	0.13
Kiepura 1999		60	0.52	19	0.01	57	0.04	58	0.04	37	0.06	50	0.05
Korecka 1992		54	0.61	40	0.00	60	0.03	59	0.03	56	0.04	65	0.03
Kushner 1990		53	0.62	4	0.08	5	0.10	13	0.25	3	0.50	8	0.35
Lilamand 2001		27	0.72	52	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.07	15	0.33	16	0.15
Luisada 1990		22	0.74	16	0.01	20	0.07	23	0.15	26	0.20	13	0.17
Luisada 2008		44	0.67	46	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	53	0.04	62	0.04
Lushtak 2004		29	0.72	37	0.00	27	0.05	24	0.15	28	0.17	14	0.16
Malcuzynski 1951		52	0.62	53	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	45	0.05	55	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		59	0.54	35	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	48	0.05	59	0.04
Magaloff 1977		48	0.65	47	0.00	25	0.04	32	0.09	33	0.10	37	0.09
Magin 1975		49	0.64	23	0.01	59	0.03	60	0.03	56	0.04	64	0.03
Meguri 1997		8	0.79	20	0.01	7	0.09	7	0.34	2	0.41	6	0.37
Milkina 1970		21	0.75	28	0.00	24	0.05	31	0.11	58	0.05	43	0.07
Mohovich 1999		14	0.77	66	0.00	38	0.08	33	0.08	52	0.04	47	0.06
Nezu 2005		46	0.67	56	0.00	12	0.10	15	0.20	41	0.07	24	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		4	0.81	18	0.01	8	0.11	6	0.35	16	0.38	7	0.36
Olejniczak 1990		34	0.70	48	0.00	47	0.04	53	0.04	33	0.07	56	0.05
Osinska 1989		41	0.68	7	0.05	15	0.10	14	0.22	49	0.05	27	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		26	0.73	61	0.00	56	0.05	47	0.05	24	0.21	26	0.10
Poblocka 1999		17	0.76	29	0.00	31	0.07	22	0.16	40	0.06	29	0.10
Rangell 2001		19	0.75	45	0.00	26	0.04	26	0.14	30	0.14	18	0.14
Richter 1960		55	0.60	42	0.00	50	0.03	63	0.03	49	0.05	61	0.04
Richter 1961		50	0.64	36	0.00	48	0.05	45	0.05	34	0.07	45	0.06
Rosen 1989		23	0.74	26	0.00	34	0.05	43	0.05	9	0.40	17	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		20	0.75	21	0.01	23	0.05	29	0.12	53	0.06	41	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		51	0.63	51	0.00	49	0.04	57	0.04	49	0.06	57	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.67	34	0.00	53	0.04	51	0.04	52	0.05	60	0.04
Rudanovskaya 2007		2	0.83	2	0.14	2	0.17	5	0.40	5	0.57	1	0.48
Shebanova 2002		7	0.79	63	0.00	9	0.08	10	0.30	56	0.05	23	0.12
Smith 1975		12	0.77	44	0.00	32	0.07	27	0.14	12	0.42	11	0.24
Sztompka 1959		18	0.75	22	0.01	33	0.05	42	0.05	14	0.47	15	0.15
Tanyel 1992		40	0.68	10	0.04	16	0.07	30	0.12	36	0.06	42	0.08
Tsujii 2005		1	0.83	1	0.16	1	0.16	1	0.56	29	0.20	9	0.33
Uninsky 1959		6	0.79	24	0.01	10	0.10	9	0.31	21	0.23	10	0.27
Vardi 1988		3	0.82	5	0.06	4	0.21	4	0.43	13	0.43	4	0.43
Wasowski 1980		47	0.65	39	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.05	26	0.16	35	0.09
Zimerman 1975		28	0.72	14	0.01	42	0.05	46	0.05	36	0.08	48	0.06
Random 1		65	-0.06	65	0.00	64	0.02	65	0.02	28	0.14	53	0.05
Random 2		66	-0.13	57	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	62	0.03	66	0.02
Random 3		64	-0.01	59	0.00	65	0.02	64	0.02	8	0.45	38	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).