Vardi 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.70	25	0.00	27	0.09	25	0.31	28	0.25	26	0.28
Ax 1995		13	0.72	46	0.00	12	0.09	10	0.53	29	0.21	22	0.33
Bacha 1998		55	0.57	21	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	32	0.10	53	0.07
Barbosa 1983		39	0.64	11	0.01	16	0.11	19	0.39	16	0.45	15	0.42
BenOr 1989		45	0.62	35	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.07	27	0.32	41	0.15
Biret 1990		17	0.71	16	0.00	14	0.09	18	0.39	11	0.68	10	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.60	26	0.00	49	0.07	40	0.07	42	0.07	51	0.07
Chiu 1999		40	0.64	54	0.00	43	0.06	50	0.06	18	0.46	33	0.17
Clidat 1994		28	0.68	41	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.33	20	0.37	20	0.35
Cohen 1997		59	0.50	66	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	19	0.37	47	0.12
Cortot 1951		63	0.37	48	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	50	0.04	63	0.05
Csalog 1996		31	0.66	27	0.00	37	0.10	34	0.10	12	0.42	29	0.20
Czerny 1989		25	0.68	44	0.00	33	0.07	42	0.07	24	0.30	43	0.14
Ezaki 2006		37	0.65	49	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	52	0.06	56	0.06
Falvay 1989		3	0.77	6	0.05	3	0.28	3	0.70	15	0.49	5	0.59
Fiorentino 1962		21	0.70	9	0.01	17	0.12	13	0.47	23	0.45	13	0.46
Fliere 1977		32	0.66	43	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	34	0.08	50	0.08
Fou 1978		8	0.73	15	0.01	8	0.19	6	0.57	18	0.55	7	0.56
Francois 1956		43	0.62	61	0.00	40	0.07	43	0.07	21	0.33	42	0.15
Goldenweiser 1946		61	0.48	32	0.00	62	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.05	62	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.48	50	0.00	57	0.07	39	0.07	36	0.08	55	0.07
Groot 1988		14	0.72	8	0.01	11	0.13	17	0.40	9	0.49	14	0.44
Hatto 1993		10	0.72	57	0.00	20	0.10	15	0.46	27	0.23	23	0.33
Hatto 1997		9	0.73	18	0.00	19	0.07	12	0.48	27	0.26	19	0.35
Horszowski 1983		56	0.56	39	0.00	58	0.05	56	0.05	18	0.26	48	0.11
Indjic 2001		12	0.72	19	0.00	21	0.15	14	0.46	28	0.22	24	0.32
Katin 1996		4	0.75	10	0.01	6	0.20	5	0.63	8	0.67	2	0.65
Kiepura 1999		36	0.65	4	0.08	10	0.12	24	0.33	9	0.51	16	0.41
Korecka 1992		60	0.49	55	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	35	0.08	58	0.06
Kushner 1990		42	0.63	37	0.00	26	0.10	28	0.20	17	0.49	25	0.31
Lilamand 2001		54	0.58	58	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	17	0.32	44	0.14
Luisada 1990		53	0.59	56	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.07	61	0.06
Luisada 2008		44	0.62	22	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	25	0.31	45	0.14
Lushtak 2004		38	0.65	33	0.00	31	0.07	32	0.15	27	0.18	37	0.16
Malcuzynski 1951		29	0.67	38	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.16	31	0.19	36	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		41	0.63	24	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.24	29	0.19	28	0.21
Magaloff 1977		58	0.51	51	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	37	0.08	60	0.06
Magin 1975		46	0.62	52	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	51	0.06	57	0.06
Meguri 1997		35	0.65	59	0.00	38	0.11	33	0.11	3	0.45	27	0.22
Milkina 1970		6	0.74	5	0.06	5	0.20	4	0.66	17	0.57	4	0.61
Mohovich 1999		30	0.67	42	0.00	34	0.07	44	0.07	39	0.07	54	0.07
Nezu 2005		7	0.73	3	0.10	4	0.22	9	0.55	15	0.57	8	0.56
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.69	63	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.15	30	0.23	30	0.19
Olejniczak 1990		19	0.70	20	0.00	13	0.10	16	0.42	14	0.53	12	0.47
Osinska 1989		2	0.77	2	0.18	2	0.35	1	0.82	9	0.67	1	0.74
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.53	45	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	58	0.04	64	0.04
Poblocka 1999		16	0.71	47	0.00	22	0.11	20	0.38	25	0.30	21	0.34
Rangell 2001		26	0.68	29	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.07	18	0.47	32	0.18
Richter 1960		47	0.61	30	0.00	46	0.06	54	0.06	23	0.40	39	0.15
Richter 1961		48	0.61	14	0.01	42	0.06	47	0.06	19	0.40	38	0.15
Rosen 1989		34	0.65	40	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	21	0.32	40	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		11	0.72	17	0.00	7	0.20	7	0.57	13	0.50	9	0.53
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.71	23	0.00	15	0.10	11	0.48	13	0.48	11	0.48
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.69	34	0.00	25	0.12	21	0.35	15	0.44	17	0.39
Rudanovskaya 2007		33	0.66	31	0.00	44	0.05	59	0.05	7	0.57	34	0.17
Shebanova 2002		15	0.72	28	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.34	16	0.43	18	0.38
Smith 1975		51	0.60	64	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	33	0.09	52	0.07
Sztompka 1959		49	0.61	13	0.01	52	0.05	55	0.05	34	0.08	59	0.06
Tanyel 1992		27	0.68	7	0.04	18	0.08	26	0.30	34	0.10	35	0.17
Tsujii 2005		1	0.79	1	0.34	1	0.34	2	0.74	17	0.54	3	0.63
Uninsky 1959		22	0.69	36	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.18	26	0.18	31	0.18
Vardi 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		52	0.59	53	0.00	50	0.07	36	0.07	31	0.16	49	0.11
Zimerman 1975		5	0.75	12	0.01	9	0.20	8	0.56	8	0.59	6	0.57
Random 1		64	-0.01	60	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	5	0.53	46	0.13
Random 2		65	-0.03	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	55	0.04	65	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.03	62	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	26	0.12	66	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).