Czerny 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.65	24	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.42	35	0.08	22	0.18
Ax 1995		9	0.71	50	0.00	13	0.10	13	0.46	33	0.13	17	0.24
Bacha 1998		50	0.58	44	0.00	45	0.05	57	0.05	22	0.37	30	0.14
Barbosa 1983		55	0.56	11	0.01	19	0.11	19	0.36	28	0.29	12	0.32
BenOr 1989		59	0.51	65	0.00	46	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.08	50	0.07
Biret 1990		41	0.62	26	0.00	35	0.07	37	0.07	42	0.07	52	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		31	0.65	34	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.15	32	0.16	27	0.15
Chiu 1999		44	0.61	41	0.00	54	0.07	35	0.07	30	0.23	34	0.13
Clidat 1994		40	0.63	53	0.00	41	0.04	61	0.04	34	0.10	55	0.06
Cohen 1997		62	0.42	51	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	52	0.05	64	0.04
Cortot 1951		63	0.34	33	0.00	63	0.06	40	0.06	20	0.25	39	0.12
Csalog 1996		33	0.65	32	0.00	43	0.05	51	0.05	34	0.08	54	0.06
Czerny 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		12	0.70	38	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.24	36	0.09	26	0.15
Falvay 1989		1	0.78	1	0.26	1	0.25	1	0.71	19	0.39	3	0.53
Fiorentino 1962		28	0.66	45	0.00	17	0.10	18	0.38	31	0.19	14	0.27
Fliere 1977		4	0.73	4	0.10	3	0.23	3	0.64	8	0.51	2	0.57
Fou 1978		14	0.70	3	0.17	2	0.23	6	0.59	15	0.57	1	0.58
Francois 1956		47	0.59	25	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	27	0.16	45	0.09
Goldenweiser 1946		53	0.58	42	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	27	0.21	43	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.49	52	0.00	44	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.36	36	0.13
Groot 1988		25	0.68	19	0.01	28	0.09	30	0.20	31	0.13	24	0.16
Hatto 1993		8	0.72	12	0.01	9	0.16	11	0.48	41	0.07	23	0.18
Hatto 1997		5	0.73	23	0.00	10	0.13	12	0.48	43	0.07	21	0.18
Horszowski 1983		46	0.60	56	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	20	0.25	41	0.11
Indjic 2001		6	0.73	47	0.00	11	0.13	10	0.48	37	0.09	19	0.21
Katin 1996		16	0.69	54	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.34	37	0.10	20	0.18
Kiepura 1999		56	0.53	18	0.01	39	0.04	62	0.04	23	0.30	40	0.11
Korecka 1992		58	0.52	49	0.00	60	0.05	43	0.05	45	0.06	58	0.05
Kushner 1990		61	0.45	62	0.00	56	0.05	42	0.05	63	0.03	62	0.04
Lilamand 2001		57	0.52	57	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	53	0.04	63	0.04
Luisada 1990		45	0.61	63	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	40	0.08	56	0.06
Luisada 2008		52	0.58	37	0.00	53	0.06	38	0.06	39	0.08	49	0.07
Lushtak 2004		19	0.69	9	0.02	6	0.17	5	0.60	18	0.45	4	0.52
Malcuzynski 1951		21	0.68	7	0.03	8	0.29	7	0.55	29	0.20	11	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.64	2	0.18	5	0.18	9	0.49	27	0.22	8	0.33
Magaloff 1977		49	0.58	59	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	22	0.25	42	0.11
Magin 1975		36	0.64	14	0.01	36	0.05	45	0.05	50	0.06	57	0.05
Meguri 1997		43	0.62	64	0.00	48	0.06	39	0.06	22	0.23	38	0.12
Milkina 1970		20	0.69	29	0.00	18	0.10	17	0.39	36	0.11	18	0.21
Mohovich 1999		17	0.69	39	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.23	36	0.08	33	0.14
Nezu 2005		39	0.63	28	0.00	23	0.07	27	0.24	45	0.07	35	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.68	35	0.00	37	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.05	60	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		35	0.65	20	0.01	33	0.10	33	0.10	44	0.07	47	0.08
Osinska 1989		3	0.73	5	0.04	7	0.20	4	0.62	25	0.31	6	0.44
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.58	48	0.00	58	0.05	49	0.05	25	0.15	44	0.09
Poblocka 1999		18	0.69	27	0.00	27	0.11	23	0.30	42	0.07	29	0.14
Rangell 2001		30	0.65	40	0.00	42	0.05	60	0.05	34	0.10	51	0.07
Richter 1960		23	0.68	6	0.04	21	0.07	25	0.24	15	0.46	9	0.33
Richter 1961		29	0.65	21	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.07	23	0.34	28	0.15
Rosen 1989		27	0.67	22	0.00	22	0.10	29	0.23	25	0.29	15	0.26
Rubinstein 1939		11	0.70	36	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.43	26	0.32	7	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.65	55	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.34	35	0.08	25	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		15	0.70	15	0.01	12	0.10	8	0.52	19	0.43	5	0.47
Rudanovskaya 2007		26	0.67	43	0.00	38	0.05	50	0.05	20	0.42	32	0.14
Shebanova 2002		7	0.72	31	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.31	23	0.26	13	0.28
Smith 1975		51	0.58	16	0.01	50	0.05	44	0.05	44	0.07	53	0.06
Sztompka 1959		38	0.63	8	0.02	40	0.05	55	0.05	46	0.06	59	0.05
Tanyel 1992		42	0.62	46	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	60	0.05	61	0.05
Tsujii 2005		2	0.77	13	0.01	4	0.25	2	0.64	33	0.10	16	0.25
Uninsky 1959		10	0.71	10	0.01	31	0.07	31	0.16	36	0.09	37	0.12
Vardi 1988		24	0.68	30	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.30	42	0.07	31	0.14
Wasowski 1980		54	0.57	60	0.00	55	0.07	36	0.07	36	0.07	48	0.07
Zimerman 1975		13	0.70	17	0.01	15	0.09	15	0.42	29	0.26	10	0.33
Random 1		65	-0.02	58	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	14	0.34	46	0.08
Random 2		64	0.00	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	36	0.05	65	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.06	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	56	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).