Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ax 1995		14	0.73	51	0.00	16	0.07	20	0.42	28	0.21	27	0.30
Bacha 1998		34	0.67	33	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	13	0.53	39	0.18
Barbosa 1983		22	0.72	9	0.01	18	0.09	23	0.35	9	0.51	20	0.42
BenOr 1989		44	0.65	35	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	46	0.07	61	0.06
Biret 1990		49	0.63	40	0.00	51	0.08	38	0.08	49	0.06	60	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		33	0.68	21	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	21	0.34	43	0.17
Chiu 1999		35	0.67	16	0.01	40	0.07	44	0.07	5	0.59	35	0.20
Clidat 1994		3	0.77	2	0.09	2	0.39	2	0.70	1	0.78	2	0.74
Cohen 1997		59	0.53	56	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	12	0.52	41	0.18
Cortot 1951		62	0.45	63	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	25	0.22	56	0.09
Csalog 1996		40	0.66	54	0.00	43	0.06	49	0.06	23	0.25	51	0.12
Czerny 1989		42	0.65	58	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	16	0.42	40	0.18
Ezaki 2006		8	0.75	14	0.01	8	0.10	10	0.51	12	0.57	7	0.54
Falvay 1989		16	0.72	5	0.03	10	0.07	14	0.50	26	0.29	23	0.38
Fiorentino 1962		26	0.71	46	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.08	30	0.23	48	0.14
Fliere 1977		5	0.76	3	0.07	3	0.24	3	0.67	2	0.61	3	0.64
Fou 1978		12	0.73	7	0.02	11	0.08	25	0.33	23	0.48	22	0.40
Francois 1956		36	0.67	6	0.03	25	0.09	27	0.28	3	0.70	17	0.44
Goldenweiser 1946		63	0.38	19	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	50	0.04	63	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		48	0.63	37	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	7	0.53	42	0.18
Groot 1988		52	0.60	38	0.00	44	0.06	54	0.06	42	0.07	62	0.06
Hatto 1993		25	0.71	43	0.00	20	0.16	17	0.47	25	0.26	25	0.35
Hatto 1997		19	0.72	61	0.00	13	0.09	9	0.52	22	0.41	14	0.46
Horszowski 1983		61	0.51	60	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	23	0.24	53	0.10
Indjic 2001		21	0.72	27	0.00	15	0.11	12	0.51	23	0.34	21	0.42
Katin 1996		23	0.72	11	0.01	32	0.09	32	0.18	24	0.35	31	0.25
Kiepura 1999		45	0.64	39	0.00	54	0.06	57	0.06	39	0.08	58	0.07
Korecka 1992		55	0.58	49	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	23	0.34	49	0.13
Kushner 1990		37	0.67	48	0.00	41	0.07	45	0.07	20	0.37	46	0.16
Lilamand 2001		56	0.57	53	0.00	56	0.07	46	0.07	5	0.49	38	0.19
Luisada 1990		53	0.60	25	0.00	53	0.06	55	0.06	31	0.17	55	0.10
Luisada 2008		47	0.63	17	0.01	52	0.07	40	0.07	24	0.40	45	0.17
Lushtak 2004		17	0.72	36	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.39	14	0.50	16	0.44
Malcuzynski 1951		2	0.77	31	0.00	5	0.14	8	0.54	18	0.40	15	0.46
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.76	22	0.00	4	0.09	6	0.55	15	0.42	11	0.48
Magaloff 1977		54	0.59	44	0.00	55	0.06	56	0.06	21	0.26	52	0.12
Magin 1975		32	0.68	32	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.08	21	0.35	44	0.17
Meguri 1997		58	0.55	8	0.02	27	0.10	31	0.18	26	0.20	37	0.19
Milkina 1970		13	0.73	41	0.00	6	0.09	7	0.55	19	0.56	5	0.55
Mohovich 1999		31	0.69	20	0.00	7	0.11	13	0.50	14	0.47	12	0.48
Nezu 2005		15	0.72	28	0.00	29	0.11	26	0.30	28	0.22	30	0.26
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.72	10	0.01	23	0.12	16	0.48	7	0.61	8	0.54
Olejniczak 1990		38	0.66	45	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.07	34	0.10	57	0.08
Osinska 1989		9	0.75	52	0.00	14	0.10	11	0.51	22	0.41	13	0.46
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.53	26	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	7	0.37	47	0.14
Poblocka 1999		18	0.72	62	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.23	23	0.32	29	0.27
Rangell 2001		27	0.71	55	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.09	14	0.59	32	0.23
Richter 1960		46	0.64	29	0.00	38	0.08	39	0.08	6	0.60	33	0.22
Richter 1961		41	0.65	18	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.19	6	0.62	26	0.34
Rosen 1989		43	0.65	59	0.00	45	0.05	59	0.05	19	0.33	50	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		28	0.70	57	0.00	28	0.09	24	0.33	21	0.41	24	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		11	0.74	15	0.01	17	0.07	15	0.49	9	0.51	10	0.50
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.74	42	0.00	19	0.12	18	0.47	11	0.55	9	0.51
Rudanovskaya 2007		50	0.62	30	0.00	39	0.07	42	0.07	2	0.68	34	0.22
Shebanova 2002		7	0.75	23	0.00	9	0.08	5	0.56	3	0.71	4	0.63
Smith 1975		51	0.61	50	0.00	46	0.06	53	0.06	32	0.17	54	0.10
Sztompka 1959		57	0.57	47	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	49	0.06	64	0.05
Tanyel 1992		24	0.71	4	0.03	24	0.10	19	0.43	23	0.44	18	0.43
Tsujii 2005		1	0.81	1	0.56	1	0.55	1	0.81	3	0.69	1	0.75
Uninsky 1959		30	0.70	12	0.01	22	0.09	21	0.41	12	0.44	19	0.42
Vardi 1988		29	0.70	13	0.01	26	0.09	28	0.25	25	0.31	28	0.28
Wasowski 1980		39	0.66	24	0.00	50	0.07	41	0.07	15	0.50	36	0.19
Zimerman 1975		4	0.76	34	0.00	12	0.10	4	0.56	11	0.55	6	0.55
Random 1		66	-0.11	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	51	0.04	65	0.02
Random 2		64	-0.02	66	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	23	0.18	59	0.07
Random 3		65	-0.07	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	53	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).