Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		44	0.69	51	0.00	43	0.08	35	0.08	11	0.50	34	0.20
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.73	49	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.18	18	0.34	29	0.25
Beliavsky 2004		50	0.66	43	0.00	55	0.07	40	0.07	15	0.39	39	0.17
BenOr 1989		6	0.81	3	0.01	5	0.25	4	0.75	8	0.63	4	0.69
Biret 1990		51	0.66	55	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.43	47	0.15
Blet 2003		47	0.68	41	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	25	0.20	53	0.10
Block 1995		28	0.72	44	0.00	28	0.05	31	0.12	16	0.50	30	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.59	54	0.00	58	0.06	43	0.06	30	0.19	52	0.11
Chiu 1999		11	0.78	25	0.00	11	0.18	12	0.54	8	0.54	13	0.54
Clidat 1994		33	0.71	34	0.00	35	0.05	49	0.05	27	0.18	56	0.09
Cohen 1997		60	0.54	40	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	11	0.55	42	0.17
Coop 1987		7	0.81	37	0.00	7	0.27	7	0.64	15	0.50	10	0.57
Cortot 1951		59	0.58	27	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	31	0.22	57	0.09
Czerny 1949		31	0.71	28	0.00	15	0.14	19	0.36	12	0.46	20	0.41
Czerny 1949b		17	0.75	16	0.00	16	0.22	16	0.52	8	0.62	9	0.57
Ezaki 2006		2	0.84	2	0.10	2	0.60	2	0.82	5	0.72	1	0.77
Falvay 1989		9	0.79	26	0.00	12	0.24	10	0.55	15	0.54	14	0.54
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.70	22	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	5	0.72	36	0.19
Fiorentino 1962		27	0.72	60	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.17	19	0.46	27	0.28
Fliere 1977		12	0.78	15	0.00	10	0.14	11	0.54	8	0.58	11	0.56
Fou 1978		10	0.79	17	0.00	9	0.18	8	0.59	12	0.61	8	0.60
Francois 1956		53	0.65	33	0.00	57	0.10	33	0.10	26	0.20	50	0.14
Hatto 1997		40	0.70	29	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	12	0.47	43	0.15
Horowitz 1971		49	0.67	6	0.01	54	0.06	45	0.06	20	0.39	46	0.15
Horowitz 1985		61	0.51	39	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	32	0.15	58	0.08
Indjic 2001		43	0.69	19	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	11	0.46	45	0.15
Kapell 1951		16	0.75	65	0.00	20	0.13	21	0.30	25	0.34	24	0.32
Kiepura 1999		18	0.75	14	0.00	21	0.13	20	0.32	3	0.66	18	0.46
Kilenyi 1937		14	0.77	35	0.00	13	0.28	14	0.53	17	0.54	15	0.53
Kissin 1993		3	0.83	4	0.01	3	0.24	5	0.74	7	0.56	6	0.64
Kitain 1937		63	0.36	32	0.00	63	0.06	48	0.06	57	0.04	63	0.05
Kushner 1990		20	0.74	10	0.01	17	0.12	15	0.52	15	0.51	16	0.51
Levy 1951		54	0.64	45	0.00	56	0.09	34	0.09	14	0.47	32	0.21
Luisada 1990		36	0.70	38	0.00	50	0.06	42	0.06	23	0.30	51	0.13
Lushtak 2004		13	0.78	8	0.01	14	0.13	13	0.53	5	0.70	7	0.61
Lympany 1968		30	0.72	20	0.00	44	0.07	37	0.07	10	0.50	35	0.19
Magaloff 1977		22	0.74	61	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.22	7	0.53	23	0.34
Magaloff 1977b		25	0.73	50	0.00	27	0.09	26	0.17	9	0.52	26	0.30
Magin 1975		8	0.80	36	0.00	8	0.15	9	0.59	20	0.52	12	0.55
Milkina 1970		23	0.73	31	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.07	21	0.46	37	0.18
Mohovich 1999		41	0.69	11	0.00	25	0.08	27	0.17	9	0.61	25	0.32
Nadelmann 1956		48	0.67	47	0.00	38	0.05	59	0.05	28	0.16	55	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.76	21	0.00	19	0.15	18	0.41	8	0.58	17	0.49
Olejniczac 1990		29	0.72	57	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	21	0.41	33	0.21
Olejniczak 1991		26	0.73	53	0.00	23	0.12	22	0.29	18	0.39	22	0.34
Osinska 1989		5	0.81	7	0.01	4	0.20	3	0.79	9	0.57	5	0.67
Paderewski 1912		55	0.63	66	0.00	47	0.05	60	0.05	46	0.06	62	0.05
Perahia 1994		58	0.59	5	0.01	40	0.06	44	0.06	10	0.55	38	0.18
Perlemuter 1986		46	0.69	58	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.12	43	0.07	54	0.09
Poblocka 1999		4	0.82	12	0.00	6	0.33	6	0.71	4	0.71	2	0.71
Rangell 2001		19	0.74	46	0.00	22	0.09	23	0.27	16	0.48	21	0.36
Risler 1920		52	0.65	56	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	25	0.35	48	0.14
Rosen 1989		42	0.69	18	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	15	0.48	44	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.62	23	0.00	39	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.37	49	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		37	0.70	30	0.00	41	0.05	51	0.05	32	0.14	59	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		35	0.70	24	0.00	42	0.07	38	0.07	14	0.43	41	0.17
Rummel 1943		62	0.49	64	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.04	64	0.04
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		45	0.69	59	0.00	37	0.06	46	0.06	34	0.08	60	0.07
Szpilman 1948		39	0.70	9	0.01	30	0.05	29	0.13	21	0.49	28	0.25
Uninsky 1971		32	0.71	52	0.00	34	0.07	41	0.07	15	0.40	40	0.17
Wasowski 1980		34	0.71	13	0.00	33	0.07	39	0.07	5	0.71	31	0.22
Weissenberg 1971		21	0.74	42	0.00	18	0.14	17	0.43	15	0.48	19	0.45
Average		1	0.87	1	0.77	1	0.76	1	0.90	7	0.56	3	0.71
Random 1		65	-0.03	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	38	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.04	62	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	29	0.16	61	0.07
Random 3		66	-0.04	48	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	41	0.05	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).