Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.73	17	0.00	17	0.16	17	0.53	4	0.64	10	0.58
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.74	5	0.02	19	0.17	19	0.51	23	0.22	20	0.33
Beliavsky 2004		32	0.69	12	0.00	24	0.15	24	0.32	12	0.44	17	0.38
BenOr 1989		6	0.76	10	0.00	8	0.14	5	0.68	25	0.26	16	0.42
Biret 1990		33	0.69	15	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.23	20	0.39	22	0.30
Blet 2003		41	0.67	31	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	49	0.05	42	0.07
Block 1995		52	0.63	52	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	39	0.07	54	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		59	0.60	55	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	36	0.09	45	0.06
Chiu 1999		50	0.65	59	0.00	34	0.06	42	0.06	54	0.05	59	0.05
Clidat 1994		17	0.73	41	0.00	11	0.11	15	0.56	9	0.45	14	0.50
Cohen 1997		62	0.57	16	0.00	43	0.05	53	0.05	4	0.69	27	0.19
Coop 1987		19	0.72	9	0.01	20	0.17	8	0.63	43	0.06	26	0.19
Cortot 1951		60	0.59	50	0.00	63	0.06	49	0.06	19	0.36	34	0.15
Czerny 1949		51	0.64	61	0.00	46	0.06	45	0.06	45	0.06	51	0.06
Czerny 1949b		44	0.66	53	0.00	48	0.07	35	0.07	56	0.04	61	0.05
Ezaki 2006		29	0.69	40	0.00	35	0.06	47	0.06	57	0.05	57	0.05
Falvay 1989		30	0.69	26	0.00	41	0.06	44	0.06	44	0.07	46	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		55	0.61	54	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	35	0.09	49	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		47	0.66	33	0.00	49	0.07	34	0.07	52	0.06	56	0.06
Fliere 1977		15	0.73	37	0.00	18	0.15	20	0.49	35	0.09	25	0.21
Fou 1978		26	0.70	51	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.15	55	0.05	39	0.09
Francois 1956		37	0.68	39	0.00	37	0.06	48	0.06	10	0.52	29	0.18
Hatto 1997		5	0.77	8	0.01	13	0.12	10	0.62	3	0.75	4	0.68
Horowitz 1971		46	0.66	7	0.01	25	0.12	26	0.24	11	0.48	18	0.34
Horowitz 1985		58	0.60	44	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	9	0.53	33	0.15
Indjic 2001		4	0.77	20	0.00	14	0.22	9	0.63	3	0.78	3	0.70
Kapell 1951		34	0.68	46	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.06	52	0.06	48	0.06
Kiepura 1999		38	0.67	19	0.00	52	0.06	40	0.06	45	0.06	44	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		49	0.65	60	0.00	42	0.07	33	0.07	53	0.06	50	0.06
Kissin 1993		10	0.74	24	0.00	16	0.15	11	0.58	37	0.09	23	0.23
Kitain 1937		63	0.41	57	0.00	62	0.05	58	0.05	8	0.52	32	0.16
Kushner 1990		9	0.75	22	0.00	5	0.23	6	0.66	12	0.53	9	0.59
Levy 1951		61	0.59	42	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.06	60	0.05
Luisada 1990		53	0.63	47	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	50	0.06	63	0.05
Lushtak 2004		7	0.76	29	0.00	9	0.15	7	0.65	9	0.63	6	0.64
Lympany 1968		27	0.69	58	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.12	29	0.21	30	0.16
Magaloff 1977		23	0.71	34	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.06	50	0.06	52	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		24	0.71	36	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.07	32	0.17	36	0.11
Magin 1975		42	0.66	43	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	43	0.07	47	0.06
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		18	0.72	6	0.01	15	0.13	13	0.57	6	0.69	8	0.63
Nadelmann 1956		28	0.69	13	0.00	22	0.15	23	0.38	17	0.27	21	0.32
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.69	38	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.14	41	0.07	37	0.10
Olejniczac 1990		43	0.66	62	0.00	47	0.07	37	0.07	51	0.06	53	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		36	0.68	25	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.07	37	0.09	40	0.08
Osinska 1989		3	0.80	30	0.00	3	0.21	3	0.75	26	0.31	15	0.48
Paderewski 1912		45	0.66	63	0.00	36	0.05	55	0.05	32	0.11	43	0.07
Perahia 1994		25	0.70	2	0.03	12	0.13	16	0.54	2	0.75	7	0.64
Perlemuter 1986		11	0.74	3	0.03	4	0.24	4	0.74	3	0.74	2	0.74
Poblocka 1999		40	0.67	35	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	34	0.09	41	0.07
Rangell 2001		22	0.71	27	0.00	26	0.09	25	0.26	30	0.18	24	0.22
Risler 1920		57	0.60	66	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	50	0.06	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		54	0.62	32	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.05	64	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		14	0.73	11	0.00	6	0.13	12	0.58	4	0.77	5	0.67
Rubinstein 1952		8	0.75	14	0.00	7	0.16	14	0.57	12	0.52	12	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.80	4	0.02	2	0.39	2	0.80	5	0.75	1	0.77
Rummel 1943		56	0.60	48	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	16	0.28	35	0.12
Shebanova 2002		13	0.73	18	0.00	21	0.18	21	0.46	36	0.07	28	0.18
Smith 1975		20	0.71	28	0.00	10	0.17	18	0.53	7	0.49	13	0.51
Szpilman 1948		39	0.67	23	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.14	47	0.06	38	0.09
Uninsky 1971		21	0.71	21	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.39	19	0.28	19	0.33
Wasowski 1980		35	0.68	45	0.00	44	0.06	46	0.06	15	0.44	31	0.16
Weissenberg 1971		48	0.65	49	0.00	45	0.06	39	0.06	56	0.05	62	0.05
Average		1	0.85	1	0.79	1	0.78	1	0.92	26	0.33	11	0.55
Random 1		66	-0.04	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	49	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		64	0.04	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	34	0.06	65	0.04
Random 3		65	-0.02	56	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	10	0.41	55	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).