Fliere 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.69	58	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.17	9	0.56	31	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.76	15	0.00	8	0.10	23	0.45	7	0.55	20	0.50
Beliavsky 2004		46	0.69	35	0.00	45	0.07	52	0.07	10	0.48	44	0.18
BenOr 1989		13	0.77	16	0.00	13	0.09	15	0.51	16	0.46	24	0.48
Biret 1990		54	0.65	51	0.00	51	0.06	56	0.06	27	0.18	59	0.10
Blet 2003		41	0.69	6	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.14	12	0.48	32	0.26
Block 1995		52	0.65	63	0.00	55	0.07	45	0.07	38	0.09	60	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.59	44	0.00	59	0.05	62	0.05	33	0.11	61	0.07
Chiu 1999		25	0.74	8	0.01	22	0.13	24	0.42	12	0.51	25	0.46
Clidat 1994		22	0.75	23	0.00	24	0.18	21	0.47	6	0.51	21	0.49
Cohen 1997		62	0.45	64	0.00	63	0.06	57	0.06	36	0.07	62	0.06
Coop 1987		5	0.79	13	0.00	2	0.17	5	0.63	14	0.51	10	0.57
Cortot 1951		61	0.55	46	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	44	0.07	63	0.06
Czerny 1949		26	0.74	28	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.47	10	0.53	19	0.50
Czerny 1949b		19	0.75	43	0.00	11	0.11	13	0.54	11	0.60	9	0.57
Ezaki 2006		3	0.80	9	0.01	5	0.19	3	0.66	17	0.57	4	0.61
Falvay 1989		15	0.76	48	0.00	18	0.10	14	0.51	16	0.46	23	0.48
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.61	59	0.00	53	0.06	58	0.06	19	0.52	45	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		14	0.77	17	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.51	7	0.69	7	0.59
Fliere 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fou 1978		10	0.77	5	0.01	17	0.10	16	0.51	17	0.56	13	0.53
Francois 1956		44	0.69	31	0.00	47	0.08	40	0.08	8	0.54	37	0.21
Hatto 1997		48	0.67	53	0.00	40	0.09	36	0.09	10	0.51	36	0.21
Horowitz 1971		53	0.65	37	0.00	52	0.07	51	0.07	27	0.28	54	0.14
Horowitz 1985		60	0.56	54	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	27	0.32	49	0.14
Indjic 2001		49	0.67	57	0.00	42	0.07	47	0.07	10	0.49	42	0.19
Kapell 1951		12	0.77	3	0.01	15	0.11	11	0.54	15	0.53	14	0.53
Kiepura 1999		27	0.74	32	0.00	36	0.09	37	0.09	10	0.56	33	0.22
Kilenyi 1937		7	0.78	34	0.00	6	0.19	7	0.60	14	0.58	6	0.59
Kissin 1993		4	0.80	11	0.01	3	0.20	4	0.65	10	0.52	8	0.58
Kitain 1937		63	0.43	41	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	26	0.24	58	0.10
Kushner 1990		24	0.74	29	0.00	23	0.14	12	0.54	13	0.53	15	0.53
Levy 1951		51	0.66	22	0.00	49	0.07	50	0.07	11	0.52	40	0.19
Luisada 1990		39	0.71	30	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	27	0.25	55	0.13
Lushtak 2004		20	0.75	50	0.00	28	0.12	28	0.30	13	0.51	28	0.39
Lympany 1968		37	0.72	27	0.00	34	0.07	43	0.07	9	0.52	39	0.19
Magaloff 1977		35	0.72	49	0.00	39	0.07	49	0.07	10	0.50	41	0.19
Magaloff 1977b		33	0.72	25	0.00	38	0.09	34	0.09	7	0.54	34	0.22
Magin 1975		6	0.79	26	0.00	9	0.11	10	0.55	22	0.49	16	0.52
Milkina 1970		29	0.73	52	0.00	37	0.09	35	0.09	20	0.49	35	0.21
Mohovich 1999		32	0.72	4	0.01	26	0.12	26	0.34	5	0.70	22	0.49
Nadelmann 1956		34	0.72	33	0.00	29	0.11	29	0.24	5	0.48	29	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.71	24	0.00	41	0.07	53	0.07	22	0.28	51	0.14
Olejniczac 1990		9	0.77	7	0.01	14	0.09	9	0.55	7	0.67	5	0.61
Olejniczak 1991		11	0.77	61	0.00	20	0.10	19	0.49	9	0.58	12	0.53
Osinska 1989		2	0.80	18	0.00	4	0.20	2	0.72	13	0.54	3	0.62
Paderewski 1912		45	0.69	65	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.07	9	0.44	46	0.18
Perahia 1994		59	0.56	66	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	26	0.29	57	0.12
Perlemuter 1986		23	0.75	20	0.00	12	0.12	18	0.49	6	0.55	17	0.52
Poblocka 1999		28	0.74	42	0.00	35	0.07	48	0.07	21	0.43	47	0.17
Rangell 2001		38	0.72	55	0.00	43	0.10	33	0.10	25	0.37	43	0.19
Risler 1920		36	0.72	38	0.00	31	0.10	30	0.19	14	0.51	30	0.31
Rosen 1989		50	0.66	45	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	26	0.35	56	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.62	39	0.00	57	0.08	38	0.08	25	0.24	50	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		31	0.72	40	0.00	33	0.08	39	0.08	26	0.32	48	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.68	47	0.00	48	0.06	54	0.06	23	0.32	52	0.14
Rummel 1943		55	0.63	36	0.00	56	0.07	44	0.07	17	0.28	53	0.14
Shebanova 2002		8	0.78	10	0.01	7	0.16	8	0.58	11	0.54	11	0.56
Smith 1975		30	0.73	14	0.00	27	0.11	27	0.33	6	0.52	27	0.41
Szpilman 1948		16	0.76	12	0.01	10	0.10	6	0.60	3	0.75	2	0.67
Uninsky 1971		18	0.76	2	0.02	25	0.12	25	0.34	4	0.59	26	0.45
Wasowski 1980		43	0.69	19	0.00	50	0.08	41	0.08	9	0.51	38	0.20
Weissenberg 1971		21	0.75	21	0.00	19	0.11	20	0.47	12	0.53	18	0.50
Average		1	0.88	1	0.83	1	0.82	1	0.91	8	0.56	1	0.71
Random 1		65	-0.02	56	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	46	0.03	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.00	62	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	40	0.06	64	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.09	60	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	65	0.02	66	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).