Clidat 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.67	33	0.00	37	0.05	59	0.05	19	0.38	46	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.71	34	0.00	14	0.10	22	0.24	25	0.22	21	0.23
Beliavsky 2004		45	0.67	11	0.01	39	0.07	37	0.07	6	0.52	27	0.19
BenOr 1989		7	0.74	57	0.00	17	0.10	14	0.39	34	0.09	28	0.19
Biret 1990		43	0.67	48	0.00	48	0.04	63	0.04	24	0.26	54	0.10
Blet 2003		44	0.67	64	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	32	0.10	57	0.07
Block 1995		23	0.71	21	0.00	33	0.06	40	0.06	14	0.51	32	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.64	32	0.00	59	0.06	42	0.06	19	0.43	35	0.16
Chiu 1999		29	0.70	22	0.00	22	0.07	21	0.26	28	0.30	18	0.28
Clidat 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cohen 1997		63	0.42	59	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	40	0.06	63	0.05
Coop 1987		4	0.76	7	0.01	3	0.38	3	0.66	22	0.44	5	0.54
Cortot 1951		56	0.62	4	0.02	50	0.05	61	0.05	8	0.56	34	0.17
Czerny 1949		12	0.72	3	0.02	8	0.11	7	0.50	16	0.42	8	0.46
Czerny 1949b		8	0.74	10	0.01	5	0.17	5	0.57	12	0.58	3	0.57
Ezaki 2006		9	0.73	15	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.35	38	0.09	29	0.18
Falvay 1989		16	0.72	6	0.01	9	0.12	11	0.40	28	0.33	15	0.36
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.60	52	0.00	58	0.05	53	0.05	23	0.35	48	0.13
Fiorentino 1962		31	0.70	23	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.36	22	0.40	13	0.38
Fliere 1977		5	0.75	29	0.00	6	0.15	6	0.51	21	0.47	7	0.49
Fou 1978		13	0.72	26	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.23	26	0.23	20	0.23
Francois 1956		51	0.64	54	0.00	57	0.06	39	0.06	23	0.27	49	0.13
Hatto 1997		58	0.62	55	0.00	54	0.06	45	0.06	26	0.18	52	0.10
Horowitz 1971		32	0.70	19	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.06	8	0.52	31	0.18
Horowitz 1985		61	0.56	17	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	19	0.37	44	0.14
Indjic 2001		59	0.61	66	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	28	0.18	53	0.10
Kapell 1951		22	0.71	8	0.01	18	0.09	20	0.26	33	0.12	30	0.18
Kiepura 1999		41	0.68	35	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	29	0.29	50	0.12
Kilenyi 1937		37	0.69	58	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.23	36	0.08	45	0.14
Kissin 1993		3	0.77	9	0.01	4	0.41	4	0.63	15	0.49	4	0.56
Kitain 1937		62	0.45	46	0.00	62	0.05	54	0.05	15	0.48	42	0.15
Kushner 1990		14	0.72	30	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.16	21	0.24	25	0.20
Levy 1951		50	0.65	61	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	17	0.45	47	0.13
Luisada 1990		39	0.68	27	0.00	53	0.06	47	0.06	41	0.07	61	0.06
Lushtak 2004		2	0.78	2	0.03	2	0.33	2	0.70	4	0.72	1	0.71
Lympany 1968		25	0.71	36	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.20	8	0.53	16	0.33
Magaloff 1977		35	0.70	37	0.00	44	0.06	38	0.06	30	0.21	51	0.11
Magaloff 1977b		27	0.70	62	0.00	42	0.07	35	0.07	18	0.37	39	0.16
Magin 1975		33	0.70	24	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.08	33	0.11	55	0.09
Milkina 1970		11	0.73	31	0.00	12	0.10	9	0.45	15	0.56	6	0.50
Mohovich 1999		40	0.68	18	0.00	43	0.07	36	0.07	25	0.31	41	0.15
Nadelmann 1956		42	0.67	44	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	51	0.05	62	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.69	20	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.06	37	0.07	60	0.06
Olejniczac 1990		34	0.70	50	0.00	21	0.10	19	0.31	26	0.35	17	0.33
Olejniczak 1991		28	0.70	42	0.00	25	0.06	24	0.23	25	0.22	23	0.22
Osinska 1989		6	0.75	49	0.00	7	0.15	8	0.48	44	0.08	24	0.20
Paderewski 1912		38	0.69	40	0.00	38	0.06	44	0.06	8	0.44	37	0.16
Perahia 1994		54	0.64	5	0.02	23	0.07	30	0.14	16	0.49	19	0.26
Perlemuter 1986		15	0.72	39	0.00	13	0.09	13	0.40	16	0.37	12	0.38
Poblocka 1999		18	0.71	38	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.15	25	0.25	26	0.19
Rangell 2001		10	0.73	28	0.00	15	0.13	12	0.40	15	0.53	9	0.46
Risler 1920		26	0.70	47	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	18	0.45	22	0.22
Rosen 1989		47	0.66	13	0.01	56	0.07	34	0.07	19	0.43	33	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.62	16	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	11	0.46	40	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		30	0.70	53	0.00	35	0.06	49	0.06	22	0.37	43	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		52	0.64	14	0.01	24	0.07	31	0.14	30	0.18	36	0.16
Rummel 1943		49	0.65	43	0.00	36	0.05	56	0.05	4	0.50	38	0.16
Shebanova 2002		24	0.71	51	0.00	29	0.05	27	0.18	49	0.05	56	0.09
Smith 1975		17	0.72	41	0.00	11	0.09	10	0.42	8	0.48	10	0.45
Szpilman 1948		48	0.66	60	0.00	52	0.05	60	0.05	35	0.08	59	0.06
Uninsky 1971		21	0.71	12	0.01	10	0.10	15	0.38	7	0.51	11	0.44
Wasowski 1980		57	0.62	45	0.00	60	0.06	48	0.06	38	0.07	58	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		19	0.71	25	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.37	21	0.37	14	0.37
Average		1	0.85	1	0.78	1	0.76	1	0.87	15	0.46	2	0.63
Random 1		65	-0.04	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	42	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		64	-0.01	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	55	0.03	65	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.09	63	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	62	0.02	66	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).