Wasowski 1980

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		54	0.32	65	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	28	0.12	51	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.34	37	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	36	0.07	53	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		59	0.30	30	0.00	56	0.03	62	0.03	27	0.17	45	0.07
BenOr 1989		7	0.51	54	0.00	7	0.18	7	0.55	18	0.57	7	0.56
Biret 1990		42	0.38	47	0.00	47	0.04	56	0.04	43	0.06	57	0.05
Blet 2003		56	0.31	33	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.06	43	0.06	50	0.06
Block 1995		25	0.43	11	0.01	20	0.09	21	0.33	26	0.20	22	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		35	0.40	48	0.00	38	0.11	33	0.11	35	0.10	41	0.10
Chiu 1999		19	0.44	5	0.02	18	0.09	15	0.41	7	0.53	12	0.47
Clidat 1994		44	0.36	36	0.00	52	0.04	51	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04
Cohen 1997		63	0.28	61	0.00	53	0.04	54	0.04	23	0.29	39	0.11
Coop 1987		22	0.43	27	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.20	43	0.07	37	0.12
Cortot 1951		61	0.29	22	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	27	0.30	40	0.11
Czerny 1949		5	0.54	7	0.01	6	0.28	4	0.70	8	0.69	2	0.69
Czerny 1949b		11	0.47	32	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.33	14	0.55	16	0.43
Ezaki 2006		2	0.60	2	0.16	2	0.46	3	0.70	6	0.66	3	0.68
Falvay 1989		52	0.33	42	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	52	0.05	59	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		39	0.38	58	0.00	15	0.10	22	0.33	24	0.42	18	0.37
Fiorentino 1962		37	0.40	38	0.00	35	0.10	34	0.10	26	0.35	26	0.19
Fliere 1977		40	0.38	23	0.00	43	0.09	36	0.09	33	0.09	43	0.09
Fou 1978		3	0.58	3	0.04	3	0.42	2	0.71	2	0.74	1	0.72
Francois 1956		33	0.41	13	0.01	36	0.08	38	0.08	8	0.51	25	0.20
Hatto 1997		15	0.45	16	0.00	13	0.12	14	0.42	15	0.52	13	0.47
Horowitz 1971		8	0.50	10	0.01	11	0.13	13	0.43	11	0.51	14	0.47
Horowitz 1985		34	0.40	55	0.00	41	0.09	35	0.09	23	0.26	32	0.15
Indjic 2001		18	0.45	12	0.01	19	0.09	16	0.38	14	0.56	15	0.46
Kapell 1951		38	0.39	14	0.00	34	0.09	37	0.09	25	0.32	28	0.17
Kiepura 1999		29	0.42	62	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.06	36	0.06	48	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		14	0.46	25	0.00	10	0.22	10	0.47	21	0.53	11	0.50
Kissin 1993		48	0.35	43	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	37	0.10	46	0.07
Kitain 1937		53	0.33	52	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	17	0.43	33	0.15
Kushner 1990		6	0.52	4	0.02	4	0.33	6	0.62	8	0.69	5	0.65
Levy 1951		16	0.45	50	0.00	12	0.14	11	0.46	3	0.66	8	0.55
Luisada 1990		36	0.40	31	0.00	42	0.08	39	0.08	25	0.24	35	0.14
Lushtak 2004		31	0.41	15	0.00	26	0.08	30	0.17	24	0.20	27	0.18
Lympany 1968		62	0.28	53	0.00	63	0.05	45	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.05
Magaloff 1977		51	0.33	63	0.00	58	0.03	60	0.03	37	0.06	61	0.04
Magaloff 1977b		55	0.32	44	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.05	64	0.04
Magin 1975		13	0.46	28	0.00	23	0.11	25	0.24	35	0.11	31	0.16
Milkina 1970		24	0.43	46	0.00	25	0.09	24	0.25	37	0.08	34	0.14
Mohovich 1999		57	0.30	49	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.05	65	0.04
Nadelmann 1956		43	0.38	45	0.00	44	0.08	40	0.08	58	0.04	49	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		50	0.34	64	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	38	0.06	56	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		30	0.42	41	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.21	20	0.45	21	0.31
Olejniczak 1991		28	0.42	35	0.00	24	0.09	23	0.27	17	0.37	19	0.32
Osinska 1989		12	0.46	24	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.37	42	0.07	30	0.16
Paderewski 1912		45	0.36	17	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	36	0.07	52	0.06
Perahia 1994		17	0.45	39	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.23	44	0.07	36	0.13
Perlemuter 1986		26	0.42	26	0.00	29	0.06	29	0.19	34	0.07	38	0.12
Poblocka 1999		4	0.55	6	0.02	5	0.40	5	0.65	5	0.70	4	0.67
Rangell 2001		10	0.49	8	0.01	8	0.16	9	0.52	2	0.74	6	0.62
Risler 1920		60	0.30	59	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	49	0.05	58	0.04
Rosen 1989		32	0.41	40	0.00	16	0.11	19	0.33	22	0.57	17	0.43
Rubinstein 1939		20	0.44	9	0.01	21	0.09	17	0.37	20	0.27	20	0.32
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.38	19	0.00	33	0.07	42	0.07	44	0.05	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.44	29	0.00	14	0.12	12	0.44	34	0.11	23	0.22
Rummel 1943		46	0.35	51	0.00	55	0.04	52	0.04	48	0.05	63	0.04
Shebanova 2002		9	0.50	18	0.00	9	0.20	8	0.54	10	0.56	9	0.55
Smith 1975		23	0.43	20	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.17	38	0.06	42	0.10
Szpilman 1948		47	0.35	34	0.00	37	0.07	41	0.07	25	0.37	29	0.16
Uninsky 1971		27	0.42	21	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.15	26	0.26	24	0.20
Wasowski 1980		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Weissenberg 1971		58	0.30	60	0.00	62	0.04	53	0.04	54	0.05	60	0.04
Average		1	0.68	1	0.65	1	0.64	1	0.91	21	0.32	10	0.54
Random 1		66	-0.01	66	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	17	0.28	44	0.07
Random 2		65	0.00	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	27	0.24	47	0.07
Random 3		64	0.01	57	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	43	0.05	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).