Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.36	51	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	16	0.38	38	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.34	52	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	47	0.06	61	0.05
Beliavsky 2004		59	0.31	64	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	50	0.06	57	0.05
BenOr 1989		5	0.54	3	0.03	4	0.28	4	0.71	12	0.64	5	0.67
Biret 1990		27	0.44	21	0.00	30	0.10	27	0.27	11	0.40	27	0.33
Blet 2003		42	0.38	37	0.00	45	0.08	38	0.08	32	0.14	44	0.11
Block 1995		24	0.45	35	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.37	10	0.51	23	0.43
Brailowsky 1960		31	0.43	15	0.00	29	0.09	25	0.30	29	0.25	31	0.27
Chiu 1999		32	0.43	46	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.19	5	0.53	28	0.32
Clidat 1994		25	0.45	40	0.00	27	0.11	28	0.27	19	0.33	30	0.30
Cohen 1997		56	0.33	32	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	14	0.49	40	0.14
Coop 1987		10	0.50	34	0.00	15	0.15	16	0.50	23	0.39	20	0.44
Cortot 1951		62	0.26	31	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	39	0.07	54	0.06
Czerny 1949		15	0.47	14	0.00	14	0.14	14	0.52	13	0.57	12	0.54
Czerny 1949b		18	0.47	11	0.01	23	0.13	22	0.43	8	0.63	13	0.52
Ezaki 2006		2	0.61	2	0.12	2	0.49	2	0.83	2	0.80	1	0.81
Falvay 1989		23	0.45	28	0.00	21	0.12	18	0.47	14	0.55	16	0.51
Ferenczy 1958		4	0.56	4	0.02	6	0.38	5	0.69	3	0.76	3	0.72
Fiorentino 1962		39	0.39	62	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.07	29	0.24	41	0.13
Fliere 1977		36	0.41	13	0.00	28	0.07	31	0.21	6	0.57	24	0.35
Fou 1978		14	0.48	22	0.00	9	0.12	11	0.55	16	0.60	9	0.57
Francois 1956		55	0.33	29	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	40	0.06	63	0.05
Hatto 1997		34	0.42	26	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	26	0.30	37	0.15
Horowitz 1971		17	0.47	7	0.01	20	0.11	23	0.41	7	0.55	19	0.47
Horowitz 1985		54	0.34	43	0.00	47	0.07	40	0.07	42	0.08	48	0.07
Indjic 2001		37	0.40	33	0.00	42	0.06	45	0.06	29	0.25	42	0.12
Kapell 1951		57	0.32	65	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	49	0.05	56	0.05
Kiepura 1999		20	0.46	23	0.00	17	0.11	15	0.50	13	0.53	15	0.51
Kilenyi 1937		28	0.44	19	0.00	10	0.12	17	0.48	19	0.57	14	0.52
Kissin 1993		19	0.47	10	0.01	24	0.11	26	0.29	24	0.40	26	0.34
Kitain 1937		60	0.30	24	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	43	0.06	62	0.05
Kushner 1990		12	0.49	6	0.01	3	0.20	8	0.59	12	0.58	8	0.58
Levy 1951		38	0.40	44	0.00	31	0.12	30	0.25	11	0.50	25	0.35
Luisada 1990		49	0.35	59	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	26	0.22	45	0.10
Lushtak 2004		11	0.49	16	0.00	13	0.10	21	0.43	15	0.45	22	0.44
Lympany 1968		30	0.43	50	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.07	16	0.49	34	0.19
Magaloff 1977		52	0.35	63	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	34	0.06	58	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		58	0.32	58	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	46	0.05	60	0.05
Magin 1975		29	0.44	45	0.00	33	0.13	33	0.13	29	0.30	33	0.20
Milkina 1970		7	0.52	25	0.00	12	0.09	13	0.54	18	0.44	17	0.49
Mohovich 1999		40	0.38	17	0.00	35	0.09	34	0.09	24	0.33	35	0.17
Nadelmann 1956		22	0.46	38	0.00	19	0.12	19	0.47	22	0.22	29	0.32
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.46	41	0.00	22	0.13	20	0.45	9	0.51	18	0.48
Olejniczac 1990		41	0.38	53	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.07	33	0.12	47	0.09
Olejniczak 1991		45	0.37	47	0.00	38	0.07	43	0.07	29	0.16	43	0.11
Osinska 1989		8	0.51	30	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.58	17	0.50	11	0.54
Paderewski 1912		61	0.26	66	0.00	61	0.06	50	0.06	54	0.04	59	0.05
Perahia 1994		6	0.53	5	0.01	7	0.13	6	0.63	6	0.63	6	0.63
Perlemuter 1986		33	0.43	18	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	40	0.06	49	0.07
Poblocka 1999		3	0.56	8	0.01	5	0.24	3	0.77	3	0.73	2	0.75
Rangell 2001		43	0.37	56	0.00	52	0.04	59	0.04	25	0.25	46	0.10
Risler 1920		47	0.36	57	0.00	44	0.06	47	0.06	14	0.40	36	0.15
Rosen 1989		16	0.47	9	0.01	18	0.12	7	0.60	11	0.63	7	0.61
Rubinstein 1939		26	0.44	54	0.00	26	0.08	29	0.26	27	0.21	32	0.23
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.42	27	0.00	37	0.09	35	0.09	34	0.06	51	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.48	39	0.00	16	0.13	12	0.55	21	0.35	21	0.44
Rummel 1943		63	0.23	48	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.04
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		44	0.37	61	0.00	40	0.06	48	0.06	40	0.06	52	0.06
Szpilman 1948		50	0.35	20	0.00	46	0.06	44	0.06	26	0.34	39	0.14
Uninsky 1971		48	0.35	49	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.06	53	0.06
Wasowski 1980		9	0.50	12	0.01	11	0.13	10	0.56	8	0.54	10	0.55
Weissenberg 1971		51	0.35	42	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	46	0.06	55	0.05
Average		1	0.68	1	0.72	1	0.70	1	0.91	9	0.52	4	0.69
Random 1		66	-0.02	60	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	44	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		65	-0.01	55	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	33	0.08	66	0.03
Random 3		64	0.04	36	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	22	0.22	50	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).