Fou 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		61	0.21	61	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	56	0.05	60	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		33	0.39	4	0.03	40	0.10	35	0.10	31	0.12	34	0.11
Beliavsky 2004		57	0.24	45	0.00	58	0.03	63	0.03	44	0.07	48	0.05
BenOr 1989		3	0.59	25	0.00	4	0.42	3	0.72	11	0.65	5	0.68
Biret 1990		31	0.39	37	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.37	41	0.06	32	0.15
Blet 2003		23	0.42	59	0.00	24	0.18	23	0.46	24	0.35	22	0.40
Block 1995		26	0.41	40	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.34	38	0.07	31	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		7	0.54	28	0.00	8	0.33	12	0.63	12	0.62	10	0.62
Chiu 1999		28	0.40	21	0.00	31	0.15	30	0.33	16	0.42	25	0.37
Clidat 1994		49	0.31	56	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.05
Cohen 1997		62	0.20	23	0.00	62	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.06	52	0.05
Coop 1987		32	0.39	62	0.00	28	0.12	28	0.35	35	0.09	29	0.18
Cortot 1951		60	0.21	54	0.00	63	0.05	54	0.05	43	0.06	55	0.05
Czerny 1949		9	0.52	10	0.01	9	0.18	6	0.69	6	0.71	4	0.70
Czerny 1949b		11	0.49	6	0.02	16	0.19	7	0.68	6	0.73	3	0.70
Ezaki 2006		2	0.61	1	0.49	1	0.48	8	0.67	8	0.66	6	0.66
Falvay 1989		25	0.41	17	0.00	21	0.14	21	0.50	25	0.35	20	0.42
Ferenczy 1958		30	0.40	52	0.00	20	0.27	20	0.54	19	0.52	19	0.53
Fiorentino 1962		22	0.42	49	0.00	26	0.11	26	0.42	25	0.35	24	0.38
Fliere 1977		39	0.35	32	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.08	36	0.07	37	0.07
Fou 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Francois 1956		48	0.32	16	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.08	37	0.07	41	0.07
Hatto 1997		55	0.25	36	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.03	59	0.04
Horowitz 1971		50	0.31	47	0.00	35	0.07	40	0.07	59	0.04	53	0.05
Horowitz 1985		53	0.28	57	0.00	34	0.07	43	0.07	52	0.07	38	0.07
Indjic 2001		58	0.24	42	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	64	0.03	63	0.04
Kapell 1951		13	0.48	15	0.00	15	0.22	11	0.63	4	0.62	11	0.62
Kiepura 1999		19	0.44	48	0.00	23	0.14	24	0.45	21	0.26	26	0.34
Kilenyi 1937		17	0.46	22	0.00	12	0.16	13	0.61	13	0.61	12	0.61
Kissin 1993		51	0.29	7	0.02	52	0.04	59	0.04	51	0.04	58	0.04
Kitain 1937		56	0.24	64	0.00	55	0.06	45	0.06	44	0.06	46	0.06
Kushner 1990		10	0.51	8	0.01	7	0.27	4	0.72	5	0.74	1	0.73
Levy 1951		21	0.42	13	0.01	19	0.18	17	0.57	7	0.61	13	0.59
Luisada 1990		16	0.46	19	0.00	22	0.14	22	0.47	5	0.67	16	0.56
Lushtak 2004		52	0.28	26	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	51	0.05	61	0.04
Lympany 1968		59	0.23	58	0.00	59	0.03	61	0.03	48	0.05	56	0.04
Magaloff 1977		40	0.35	29	0.00	44	0.06	47	0.06	38	0.06	44	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		41	0.34	30	0.00	45	0.07	42	0.07	31	0.17	33	0.11
Magin 1975		8	0.53	24	0.00	10	0.24	10	0.65	13	0.61	9	0.63
Milkina 1970		35	0.37	55	0.00	33	0.09	36	0.09	46	0.06	39	0.07
Mohovich 1999		63	0.17	60	0.00	61	0.03	60	0.03	54	0.05	64	0.04
Nadelmann 1956		27	0.41	51	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	59	0.04	36	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.36	20	0.00	41	0.10	34	0.10	61	0.04	43	0.06
Olejniczac 1990		24	0.41	12	0.01	25	0.11	25	0.44	25	0.37	23	0.40
Olejniczak 1991		29	0.40	33	0.00	30	0.10	31	0.30	26	0.20	28	0.24
Osinska 1989		6	0.55	14	0.00	6	0.34	5	0.69	12	0.61	8	0.65
Paderewski 1912		47	0.32	27	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	55	0.04	50	0.05
Perahia 1994		42	0.34	31	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	59	0.04	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		36	0.36	39	0.00	37	0.09	37	0.09	55	0.05	40	0.07
Poblocka 1999		14	0.48	18	0.00	11	0.12	18	0.57	12	0.53	18	0.55
Rangell 2001		44	0.33	11	0.01	47	0.06	46	0.06	55	0.04	54	0.05
Risler 1920		34	0.38	34	0.00	36	0.07	41	0.07	13	0.41	30	0.17
Rosen 1989		4	0.59	3	0.07	2	0.40	9	0.66	7	0.67	7	0.66
Rubinstein 1939		45	0.32	41	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	59	0.03	57	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.48	9	0.01	17	0.17	14	0.60	17	0.53	17	0.56
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.46	35	0.00	18	0.24	15	0.60	26	0.28	21	0.41
Rummel 1943		46	0.32	38	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	47	0.05	51	0.05
Shebanova 2002		12	0.48	46	0.00	13	0.16	16	0.60	11	0.55	15	0.57
Smith 1975		38	0.36	43	0.00	43	0.07	44	0.07	50	0.05	42	0.06
Szpilman 1948		20	0.43	50	0.00	14	0.18	19	0.56	13	0.59	14	0.57
Uninsky 1971		43	0.34	53	0.00	42	0.12	33	0.12	33	0.07	35	0.09
Wasowski 1980		5	0.58	5	0.02	5	0.28	2	0.74	2	0.71	2	0.72
Weissenberg 1971		54	0.25	44	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.05
Average		1	0.63	2	0.24	3	0.38	1	0.85	38	0.08	27	0.26
Random 1		65	0.00	65	0.00	65	0.02	64	0.02	51	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		66	-0.06	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	62	0.03	66	0.02
Random 3		64	0.04	63	0.00	64	0.02	65	0.02	25	0.19	45	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).