Ferenczy 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.28	53	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	60	0.04	56	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.27	64	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	54	0.05	51	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		62	0.11	59	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.03	60	0.03
BenOr 1989		4	0.56	38	0.00	5	0.37	7	0.68	13	0.63	8	0.65
Biret 1990		23	0.42	31	0.00	22	0.11	21	0.48	12	0.38	22	0.43
Blet 2003		9	0.50	21	0.00	15	0.19	14	0.62	13	0.61	10	0.61
Block 1995		26	0.41	54	0.00	31	0.11	30	0.25	29	0.15	32	0.19
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.54	3	0.14	3	0.31	4	0.73	4	0.72	2	0.72
Chiu 1999		35	0.36	34	0.00	41	0.08	42	0.08	38	0.06	44	0.07
Clidat 1994		34	0.36	41	0.00	39	0.09	39	0.09	34	0.08	42	0.08
Cohen 1997		61	0.14	57	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.02	64	0.03
Coop 1987		7	0.52	25	0.00	8	0.16	9	0.67	14	0.48	13	0.57
Cortot 1951		63	0.05	52	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	65	0.02	65	0.02
Czerny 1949		42	0.32	49	0.00	33	0.12	33	0.12	37	0.09	37	0.10
Czerny 1949b		46	0.30	47	0.00	47	0.11	34	0.11	39	0.07	41	0.09
Ezaki 2006		1	0.63	1	0.41	1	0.41	1	0.85	3	0.77	1	0.81
Falvay 1989		15	0.47	14	0.00	20	0.15	20	0.50	11	0.56	17	0.53
Ferenczy 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fiorentino 1962		12	0.49	42	0.00	13	0.24	8	0.67	10	0.67	7	0.67
Fliere 1977		36	0.36	19	0.00	32	0.12	31	0.24	14	0.45	28	0.33
Fou 1978		29	0.40	61	0.00	21	0.18	19	0.52	20	0.54	18	0.53
Francois 1956		44	0.31	24	0.00	46	0.08	44	0.08	25	0.25	34	0.14
Hatto 1997		49	0.28	51	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	64	0.02	61	0.03
Horowitz 1971		31	0.38	9	0.01	29	0.09	29	0.25	20	0.34	30	0.29
Horowitz 1985		45	0.30	28	0.00	34	0.10	36	0.10	36	0.09	40	0.09
Indjic 2001		53	0.26	20	0.00	57	0.07	50	0.07	58	0.03	53	0.05
Kapell 1951		28	0.41	35	0.00	25	0.10	26	0.36	15	0.49	23	0.42
Kiepura 1999		37	0.35	33	0.00	38	0.07	48	0.07	48	0.05	46	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		11	0.49	10	0.01	7	0.27	10	0.66	8	0.69	6	0.67
Kissin 1993		59	0.21	56	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	61	0.03	55	0.04
Kitain 1937		60	0.18	15	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.03	58	0.04
Kushner 1990		21	0.43	36	0.00	18	0.19	18	0.55	18	0.45	19	0.50
Levy 1951		18	0.45	43	0.00	19	0.17	23	0.43	9	0.55	21	0.49
Luisada 1990		58	0.22	44	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	50	0.05	52	0.05
Lushtak 2004		33	0.37	16	0.00	40	0.08	43	0.08	41	0.07	45	0.07
Lympany 1968		22	0.42	6	0.03	35	0.10	35	0.10	23	0.37	31	0.19
Magaloff 1977		40	0.33	26	0.00	45	0.09	38	0.09	22	0.31	33	0.17
Magaloff 1977b		48	0.28	40	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	57	0.04	57	0.04
Magin 1975		32	0.37	50	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.45	25	0.36	24	0.40
Milkina 1970		25	0.42	60	0.00	30	0.10	32	0.23	48	0.06	35	0.12
Mohovich 1999		39	0.34	45	0.00	42	0.08	40	0.08	32	0.13	39	0.10
Nadelmann 1956		14	0.48	11	0.01	14	0.16	15	0.60	10	0.42	20	0.50
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.42	37	0.00	27	0.11	27	0.36	21	0.26	29	0.31
Olejniczac 1990		13	0.48	32	0.00	12	0.14	6	0.69	11	0.68	5	0.68
Olejniczak 1991		16	0.46	23	0.00	11	0.16	12	0.63	9	0.64	9	0.63
Osinska 1989		10	0.50	18	0.00	9	0.15	13	0.63	14	0.55	11	0.59
Paderewski 1912		55	0.25	39	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.03	63	0.03
Perahia 1994		27	0.41	29	0.00	36	0.10	37	0.10	33	0.11	38	0.10
Perlemuter 1986		38	0.34	27	0.00	37	0.07	45	0.07	38	0.06	48	0.06
Poblocka 1999		20	0.43	8	0.01	17	0.20	17	0.59	11	0.53	14	0.56
Rangell 2001		57	0.23	17	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.03	59	0.04
Risler 1920		54	0.26	65	0.00	48	0.08	41	0.08	40	0.06	43	0.07
Rosen 1989		3	0.58	4	0.10	4	0.37	5	0.71	3	0.70	4	0.70
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.27	55	0.00	44	0.06	51	0.06	58	0.03	54	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		17	0.46	12	0.00	16	0.22	16	0.59	15	0.54	15	0.56
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.51	13	0.00	10	0.16	11	0.64	11	0.53	12	0.58
Rummel 1943		56	0.23	62	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	38	0.06	50	0.06
Shebanova 2002		5	0.56	5	0.05	6	0.28	3	0.76	5	0.69	3	0.72
Smith 1975		43	0.31	30	0.00	43	0.07	46	0.07	49	0.05	47	0.06
Szpilman 1948		41	0.33	46	0.00	26	0.10	28	0.27	21	0.44	27	0.34
Uninsky 1971		47	0.29	63	0.00	49	0.07	49	0.07	52	0.05	49	0.06
Wasowski 1980		30	0.38	22	0.00	23	0.09	24	0.42	22	0.33	26	0.37
Weissenberg 1971		19	0.44	7	0.01	28	0.14	25	0.37	13	0.43	25	0.40
Average		2	0.61	2	0.16	2	0.39	2	0.82	18	0.35	16	0.54
Random 1		64	0.03	48	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	6	0.42	36	0.11
Random 2		65	-0.04	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	52	0.04	62	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.07	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	63	0.02	66	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).