Block 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		55	0.31	41	0.00	61	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.05	62	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.28	48	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	52	0.06	63	0.04
Beliavsky 2004		59	0.29	39	0.00	57	0.03	64	0.03	54	0.05	60	0.04
BenOr 1989		3	0.51	3	0.02	5	0.17	4	0.61	19	0.57	3	0.59
Biret 1990		19	0.43	19	0.00	25	0.07	19	0.32	46	0.06	37	0.14
Blet 2003		6	0.48	12	0.00	3	0.16	6	0.58	15	0.56	4	0.57
Block 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		7	0.46	40	0.00	7	0.22	7	0.57	20	0.48	7	0.52
Chiu 1999		22	0.42	6	0.01	18	0.08	18	0.34	12	0.49	14	0.41
Clidat 1994		25	0.42	22	0.00	21	0.08	22	0.26	26	0.22	20	0.24
Cohen 1997		56	0.31	30	0.00	55	0.07	39	0.07	17	0.45	25	0.18
Coop 1987		21	0.42	56	0.00	22	0.08	17	0.34	40	0.07	32	0.15
Cortot 1951		52	0.32	26	0.00	63	0.05	50	0.05	28	0.27	39	0.12
Czerny 1949		20	0.42	55	0.00	15	0.10	11	0.48	20	0.35	15	0.41
Czerny 1949b		35	0.39	65	0.00	41	0.08	34	0.08	27	0.24	34	0.14
Ezaki 2006		36	0.39	45	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.07	34	0.13	41	0.10
Falvay 1989		33	0.39	38	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.21	49	0.05	43	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.41	61	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.15	30	0.25	23	0.19
Fiorentino 1962		34	0.39	18	0.00	14	0.15	13	0.40	18	0.45	13	0.42
Fliere 1977		61	0.29	59	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04
Fou 1978		30	0.41	34	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.07	29	0.34	31	0.15
Francois 1956		57	0.30	49	0.00	58	0.03	59	0.03	41	0.06	64	0.04
Hatto 1997		23	0.42	37	0.00	38	0.10	33	0.10	30	0.18	38	0.13
Horowitz 1971		14	0.43	28	0.00	20	0.09	23	0.25	18	0.36	18	0.30
Horowitz 1985		16	0.43	13	0.00	8	0.17	9	0.53	5	0.60	5	0.56
Indjic 2001		24	0.42	23	0.00	37	0.06	47	0.06	43	0.08	48	0.07
Kapell 1951		44	0.37	53	0.00	47	0.04	53	0.04	34	0.10	51	0.06
Kiepura 1999		4	0.49	35	0.00	4	0.16	3	0.63	9	0.60	1	0.61
Kilenyi 1937		54	0.31	50	0.00	45	0.08	35	0.08	41	0.08	45	0.08
Kissin 1993		15	0.43	20	0.00	36	0.06	43	0.06	25	0.35	36	0.14
Kitain 1937		63	0.25	66	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	41	0.07	58	0.05
Kushner 1990		41	0.38	62	0.00	43	0.07	37	0.07	37	0.08	47	0.07
Levy 1951		60	0.29	31	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	39	0.07	53	0.05
Luisada 1990		31	0.41	51	0.00	19	0.08	15	0.38	13	0.54	11	0.45
Lushtak 2004		13	0.43	17	0.00	24	0.07	21	0.32	31	0.14	22	0.21
Lympany 1968		39	0.38	5	0.01	30	0.06	31	0.13	30	0.19	29	0.16
Magaloff 1977		32	0.40	11	0.01	34	0.06	42	0.06	6	0.47	27	0.17
Magaloff 1977b		45	0.36	32	0.00	46	0.06	44	0.06	12	0.37	33	0.15
Magin 1975		11	0.44	27	0.00	10	0.16	8	0.54	24	0.39	10	0.46
Milkina 1970		28	0.41	8	0.01	33	0.06	48	0.06	53	0.05	55	0.05
Mohovich 1999		49	0.35	36	0.00	53	0.06	46	0.06	33	0.09	49	0.07
Nadelmann 1956		17	0.43	60	0.00	12	0.12	16	0.35	35	0.08	26	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.38	43	0.00	42	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.05	56	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		38	0.38	4	0.01	13	0.13	14	0.38	22	0.42	16	0.40
Olejniczak 1991		37	0.38	44	0.00	23	0.08	27	0.17	22	0.26	21	0.21
Osinska 1989		2	0.53	2	0.03	6	0.24	2	0.63	27	0.37	9	0.48
Paderewski 1912		58	0.29	33	0.00	51	0.03	60	0.03	40	0.07	57	0.05
Perahia 1994		9	0.44	58	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	40	0.07	44	0.09
Perlemuter 1986		48	0.35	57	0.00	49	0.04	57	0.04	56	0.05	61	0.04
Poblocka 1999		27	0.41	42	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.17	31	0.19	24	0.18
Rangell 2001		47	0.35	14	0.00	54	0.07	40	0.07	33	0.08	50	0.07
Risler 1920		43	0.38	63	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.22	8	0.52	17	0.34
Rosen 1989		50	0.34	54	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	27	0.46	28	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.38	47	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	35	0.08	46	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		5	0.49	25	0.00	2	0.27	5	0.60	8	0.61	2	0.60
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.43	29	0.00	16	0.11	20	0.32	36	0.08	30	0.16
Rummel 1943		53	0.31	24	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.08	52	0.06
Shebanova 2002		8	0.45	16	0.00	9	0.14	10	0.51	24	0.37	12	0.43
Smith 1975		46	0.35	52	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05
Szpilman 1948		51	0.34	15	0.00	48	0.04	54	0.04	29	0.26	42	0.10
Uninsky 1971		10	0.44	9	0.01	11	0.15	12	0.45	11	0.55	8	0.50
Wasowski 1980		18	0.43	7	0.01	17	0.10	26	0.20	21	0.33	19	0.26
Weissenberg 1971		26	0.41	10	0.01	31	0.06	30	0.13	29	0.15	35	0.14
Average		1	0.65	1	0.81	1	0.79	1	0.90	19	0.34	6	0.55
Random 1		65	0.00	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	48	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.02	21	0.00	64	0.03	62	0.03	12	0.40	40	0.11
Random 3		66	-0.03	46	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	54	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).