Rummel 1943

Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	55	0.24	34	0.00	52	0.04	51	0.04	41	0.05	59	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981	37	0.33	53	0.00	34	0.07	34	0.07	48	0.06	40	0.06
Beliavsky 2004	62	0.17	65	0.00	58	0.03	63	0.03	48	0.07	50	0.05
BenOr 1989	51	0.27	44	0.00	57	0.03	58	0.03	59	0.05	62	0.04
Biret 1990	26	0.35	49	0.00	31	0.09	27	0.18	35	0.07	30	0.11
Blet 2003	23	0.37	5	0.07	7	0.16	12	0.35	29	0.19	17	0.26
Block 1995	44	0.31	22	0.01	32	0.08	29	0.15	50	0.05	34	0.09
Brailowsky 1960	6	0.46	11	0.02	10	0.17	7	0.50	32	0.17	10	0.29
Chiu 1999	41	0.32	43	0.00	46	0.05	43	0.05	49	0.05	46	0.05
Clidat 1994	12	0.41	9	0.04	6	0.13	9	0.46	23	0.30	5	0.37
Cohen 1997	59	0.22	55	0.00	56	0.04	54	0.04	29	0.17	35	0.08
Coop 1987	16	0.39	41	0.00	29	0.09	22	0.25	48	0.05	28	0.11
Cortot 1951	47	0.30	16	0.01	20	0.09	28	0.16	19	0.46	15	0.27
Czerny 1949	11	0.43	25	0.00	16	0.13	20	0.28	29	0.22	18	0.25
Czerny 1949b	24	0.36	31	0.00	37	0.04	50	0.04	44	0.06	48	0.05
Ezaki 2006	56	0.24	61	0.00	60	0.04	53	0.04	54	0.06	43	0.05
Falvay 1989	50	0.28	26	0.00	53	0.05	48	0.05	45	0.05	47	0.05
Ferenczy 1958	58	0.23	63	0.00	42	0.06	37	0.06	51	0.06	38	0.06
Fiorentino 1962	21	0.37	32	0.00	38	0.05	45	0.05	41	0.08	41	0.06
Fliere 1977	40	0.33	28	0.00	44	0.04	49	0.04	42	0.05	55	0.04
Fou 1978	42	0.32	48	0.00	49	0.05	46	0.05	49	0.06	49	0.05
Francois 1956	14	0.40	45	0.00	23	0.06	30	0.14	17	0.42	19	0.24
Hatto 1997	32	0.34	46	0.00	22	0.10	19	0.28	39	0.07	22	0.14
Horowitz 1971	4	0.47	12	0.02	3	0.17	2	0.56	12	0.51	3	0.53
Horowitz 1985	45	0.31	59	0.00	14	0.12	26	0.19	31	0.17	20	0.18
Indjic 2001	35	0.34	42	0.00	21	0.07	18	0.29	30	0.25	14	0.27
Kapell 1951	53	0.26	39	0.00	55	0.03	62	0.03	57	0.04	64	0.03
Kiepura 1999	10	0.43	21	0.01	12	0.09	16	0.30	22	0.25	13	0.27
Kilenyi 1937	17	0.38	29	0.00	26	0.06	31	0.13	44	0.07	32	0.10
Kissin 1993	28	0.34	6	0.07	19	0.07	32	0.13	30	0.17	21	0.15
Kitain 1937	54	0.26	30	0.00	51	0.03	59	0.03	36	0.08	53	0.05
Kushner 1990	52	0.27	40	0.00	50	0.03	60	0.03	47	0.05	57	0.04
Levy 1951	30	0.34	24	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.06	40	0.07	37	0.06
Luisada 1990	1	0.50	3	0.11	2	0.20	6	0.51	9	0.59	1	0.55
Lushtak 2004	48	0.29	57	0.00	48	0.05	42	0.05	59	0.04	60	0.04
Lympany 1968	43	0.32	60	0.00	45	0.05	44	0.05	53	0.05	44	0.05
Magaloff 1977	20	0.37	47	0.00	24	0.06	17	0.29	17	0.38	7	0.33
Magaloff 1977b	34	0.34	27	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	25	0.21	29	0.11
Magin 1975	3	0.48	8	0.05	9	0.12	3	0.56	32	0.18	8	0.32
Milkina 1970	46	0.30	51	0.00	28	0.07	24	0.23	54	0.05	27	0.11
Mohovich 1999	60	0.19	58	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Nadelmann 1956	5	0.47	2	0.13	4	0.15	4	0.54	29	0.15	12	0.28
Ohlsson 1999	22	0.37	15	0.01	25	0.07	14	0.32	43	0.05	23	0.13
Olejniczac 1990	19	0.38	36	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.06	42	0.07	39	0.06
Olejniczak 1991	18	0.38	23	0.00	39	0.07	33	0.07	49	0.07	36	0.07
Osinska 1989	29	0.34	62	0.00	47	0.06	35	0.06	59	0.04	45	0.05
Paderewski 1912	9	0.43	10	0.03	8	0.12	1	0.59	5	0.47	2	0.53
Perahia 1994	33	0.34	54	0.00	33	0.06	38	0.06	49	0.05	51	0.05
Perlemuter 1986	7	0.44	20	0.01	15	0.10	15	0.30	40	0.06	24	0.13
Poblocka 1999	8	0.43	14	0.01	13	0.10	13	0.33	26	0.24	11	0.28
Rangell 2001	39	0.33	56	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.06	36	0.07	42	0.06
Risler 1920	36	0.33	7	0.07	17	0.10	23	0.24	17	0.29	16	0.26
Rosen 1989	61	0.18	64	0.00	62	0.04	52	0.04	52	0.06	52	0.05
Rubinstein 1939	13	0.41	4	0.09	5	0.13	8	0.48	26	0.26	6	0.35
Rubinstein 1952	25	0.36	18	0.01	11	0.12	10	0.35	51	0.04	26	0.12
Rubinstein 1966	38	0.33	19	0.01	27	0.06	21	0.26	59	0.04	31	0.10
Rummel 1943	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002	57	0.23	52	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	62	0.04	58	0.04
Smith 1975	2	0.50	1	0.17	1	0.17	5	0.53	7	0.35	4	0.43
Szpilman 1948	49	0.28	38	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	50	0.05	56	0.04
Uninsky 1971	15	0.39	13	0.02	18	0.12	11	0.35	25	0.26	9	0.30
Wasowski 1980	27	0.35	35	0.00	43	0.05	47	0.05	51	0.04	54	0.04
Weissenberg 1971	31	0.34	17	0.01	30	0.08	25	0.22	41	0.07	25	0.12
Random 1	65	-0.07	33	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	45	0.04	63	0.03
Random 2	64	-0.04	50	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	50	0.04	65	0.03
Random 3	63	0.04	37	0.00	63	0.03	61	0.03	8	0.36	33	0.10

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).