Rubinstein 1966

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.40	51	0.00	43	0.05	54	0.05	10	0.54	38	0.16
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.52	11	0.01	16	0.10	17	0.46	3	0.72	15	0.58
Beliavsky 2004		61	0.28	64	0.00	61	0.06	40	0.06	29	0.14	57	0.09
BenOr 1989		4	0.62	6	0.03	4	0.28	2	0.82	1	0.84	3	0.83
Biret 1990		9	0.54	17	0.00	11	0.17	11	0.55	2	0.74	9	0.64
Blet 2003		16	0.51	14	0.00	12	0.14	15	0.48	11	0.63	16	0.55
Block 1995		36	0.43	45	0.00	40	0.08	35	0.08	20	0.32	40	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.53	43	0.00	9	0.16	9	0.61	5	0.71	8	0.66
Chiu 1999		26	0.47	31	0.00	30	0.09	30	0.26	4	0.54	30	0.37
Clidat 1994		47	0.40	61	0.00	46	0.06	41	0.06	21	0.31	44	0.14
Cohen 1997		58	0.33	49	0.00	59	0.05	52	0.05	14	0.50	41	0.16
Coop 1987		7	0.58	26	0.00	7	0.32	8	0.63	5	0.63	10	0.63
Cortot 1951		62	0.16	65	0.00	62	0.04	57	0.04	40	0.07	64	0.05
Czerny 1949		51	0.38	37	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	30	0.17	55	0.10
Czerny 1949b		50	0.38	30	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	28	0.27	50	0.12
Ezaki 2006		28	0.46	46	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.38	14	0.61	21	0.48
Falvay 1989		34	0.44	18	0.00	41	0.05	47	0.05	23	0.41	43	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		15	0.51	5	0.03	10	0.20	10	0.55	10	0.64	14	0.59
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.51	38	0.00	22	0.09	23	0.38	7	0.71	19	0.52
Fliere 1977		52	0.37	53	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	22	0.35	49	0.12
Fou 1978		29	0.46	33	0.00	24	0.08	25	0.32	14	0.60	25	0.44
Francois 1956		30	0.45	8	0.01	18	0.12	20	0.39	1	0.76	17	0.54
Hatto 1997		20	0.50	47	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.32	13	0.54	27	0.42
Horowitz 1971		44	0.40	21	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	19	0.36	36	0.18
Horowitz 1985		60	0.33	52	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.07	61	0.06
Indjic 2001		18	0.50	32	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.33	12	0.59	26	0.44
Kapell 1951		23	0.48	10	0.01	31	0.11	32	0.21	3	0.65	31	0.37
Kiepura 1999		48	0.39	62	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	43	0.05	63	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		19	0.50	20	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.51	5	0.72	12	0.61
Kissin 1993		42	0.41	25	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	28	0.18	58	0.09
Kitain 1937		56	0.35	39	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	15	0.46	45	0.14
Kushner 1990		3	0.62	3	0.12	5	0.38	3	0.79	1	0.87	2	0.83
Levy 1951		45	0.40	13	0.00	42	0.05	55	0.05	26	0.32	47	0.13
Luisada 1990		35	0.44	9	0.01	37	0.06	39	0.06	10	0.57	35	0.18
Lushtak 2004		43	0.41	50	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	21	0.26	53	0.11
Lympany 1968		54	0.36	48	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	37	0.08	60	0.06
Magaloff 1977		41	0.41	59	0.00	50	0.06	43	0.06	9	0.43	37	0.16
Magaloff 1977b		49	0.38	56	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	13	0.36	52	0.12
Magin 1975		22	0.49	36	0.00	26	0.08	28	0.30	19	0.50	29	0.39
Milkina 1970		5	0.61	7	0.01	3	0.31	6	0.68	1	0.75	6	0.71
Mohovich 1999		31	0.45	63	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.07	13	0.54	34	0.19
Nadelmann 1956		12	0.52	19	0.00	15	0.15	16	0.47	7	0.47	22	0.47
Ohlsson 1999		8	0.58	23	0.00	8	0.17	7	0.64	1	0.79	7	0.71
Olejniczac 1990		13	0.52	22	0.00	17	0.11	13	0.51	3	0.79	11	0.63
Olejniczak 1991		21	0.49	34	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.39	7	0.65	20	0.50
Osinska 1989		6	0.60	4	0.05	6	0.33	4	0.74	3	0.73	5	0.73
Paderewski 1912		40	0.41	41	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.06	7	0.44	39	0.16
Perahia 1994		32	0.44	40	0.00	32	0.12	31	0.22	18	0.39	32	0.29
Perlemuter 1986		11	0.52	12	0.01	13	0.10	12	0.54	5	0.67	13	0.60
Poblocka 1999		37	0.42	16	0.00	20	0.10	27	0.31	13	0.50	28	0.39
Rangell 2001		38	0.41	55	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	20	0.41	46	0.14
Risler 1920		55	0.35	27	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	21	0.27	54	0.10
Rosen 1989		27	0.46	42	0.00	19	0.07	18	0.43	8	0.65	18	0.53
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.64	2	0.16	2	0.33	5	0.72	2	0.82	4	0.77
Rubinstein 1952		1	0.70	1	0.52	1	0.51	1	0.87	1	0.90	1	0.88
Rubinstein 1966		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rummel 1943		59	0.33	24	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	21	0.26	56	0.10
Shebanova 2002		24	0.48	28	0.00	21	0.09	19	0.39	10	0.57	23	0.47
Smith 1975		53	0.36	35	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	14	0.30	48	0.13
Szpilman 1948		25	0.48	15	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.29	5	0.72	24	0.46
Uninsky 1971		57	0.34	54	0.00	60	0.07	37	0.07	53	0.05	62	0.06
Wasowski 1980		33	0.44	44	0.00	33	0.11	33	0.11	12	0.45	33	0.22
Weissenberg 1971		39	0.41	29	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.06	15	0.39	42	0.15
Random 1		65	0.00	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	35	0.06	65	0.03
Random 2		63	0.07	57	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	8	0.46	51	0.12
Random 3		64	0.03	60	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	17	0.25	59	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).