Horowitz 1985

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   31  0.3514  0.0132  0.0832  0.1614  0.3924  0.25
Ashkenazy 1981   61  0.1643  0.0061  0.0460  0.0455  0.0561  0.04
Beliavsky 2004   54  0.2312  0.0139  0.0840  0.0838  0.0941  0.08
BenOr 1989   19  0.3944  0.0027  0.0726  0.2532  0.1530  0.19
Biret 1990   17  0.4020  0.0026  0.0720  0.3128  0.1925  0.24
Blet 2003   47  0.303  0.0417  0.0930  0.1826  0.2428  0.21
Block 1995   7  0.437  0.026  0.144  0.648  0.544  0.59
Brailowsky 1960   4  0.449  0.013  0.1810  0.5123  0.4710  0.49
Chiu 1999   39  0.3221  0.0044  0.0935  0.0940  0.0644  0.07
Clidat 1994   27  0.3615  0.0121  0.0723  0.2624  0.2722  0.26
Cohen 1997   64  0.0462  0.0062  0.0362  0.0357  0.0365  0.03
Coop 1987   40  0.3163  0.0047  0.0653  0.0652  0.0554  0.05
Cortot 1951   35  0.3336  0.0043  0.0839  0.0810  0.5927  0.22
Czerny 1949   3  0.462  0.122  0.252  0.6811  0.592  0.63
Czerny 1949b   14  0.4053  0.0015  0.1011  0.4915  0.557  0.52
Ezaki 2006   18  0.3948  0.0025  0.0627  0.2330  0.2920  0.26
Falvay 1989   26  0.3739  0.0030  0.0924  0.2629  0.1926  0.22
Ferenczy 1958   46  0.3028  0.0038  0.0936  0.0935  0.1039  0.09
Fiorentino 1962   25  0.3737  0.0029  0.1019  0.3223  0.3816  0.35
Fliere 1977   50  0.2746  0.0053  0.0838  0.0862  0.0353  0.05
Fou 1978   49  0.2850  0.0046  0.0751  0.0742  0.0746  0.07
Francois 1956   60  0.2045  0.0060  0.0361  0.0344  0.0563  0.04
Hatto 1997   56  0.2258  0.0055  0.0555  0.0555  0.0458  0.04
Horowitz 1971   1  0.621  0.601  0.591  0.861  0.821  0.84
Horowitz 1985   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Indjic 2001   57  0.2165  0.0057  0.0556  0.0560  0.0359  0.04
Kapell 1951   36  0.3341  0.0033  0.0746  0.0726  0.2934  0.14
Kiepura 1999   2  0.4816  0.005  0.203  0.6711  0.543  0.60
Kilenyi 1937   22  0.3732  0.0028  0.0718  0.3323  0.3018  0.31
Kissin 1993   28  0.3629  0.0023  0.0828  0.2229  0.1829  0.20
Kitain 1937   41  0.314  0.0411  0.1322  0.2812  0.4715  0.36
Kushner 1990   52  0.2652  0.0051  0.0933  0.0952  0.0547  0.07
Levy 1951   9  0.4223  0.0016  0.119  0.518  0.566  0.53
Luisada 1990   23  0.3713  0.0118  0.0817  0.3419  0.4613  0.40
Lushtak 2004   21  0.3819  0.0013  0.1214  0.4330  0.1623  0.26
Lympany 1968   29  0.3618  0.0037  0.0837  0.0838  0.0742  0.07
Magaloff 1977   59  0.2154  0.0058  0.0457  0.0460  0.0364  0.03
Magaloff 1977b   55  0.2255  0.0056  0.0458  0.0454  0.0460  0.04
Magin 1975   13  0.4111  0.014  0.147  0.5621  0.459  0.50
Milkina 1970   38  0.3234  0.0022  0.0729  0.2144  0.0635  0.11
Mohovich 1999   8  0.428  0.0212  0.2212  0.4914  0.538  0.51
Nadelmann 1956   11  0.4110  0.0110  0.176  0.5820  0.2414  0.37
Ohlsson 1999   58  0.2122  0.0059  0.0652  0.0648  0.0555  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   20  0.3835  0.0020  0.0815  0.3821  0.4312  0.40
Olejniczak 1991   30  0.3559  0.0035  0.0844  0.0833  0.1236  0.10
Osinska 1989   5  0.4333  0.009  0.155  0.6330  0.2811  0.42
Paderewski 1912   44  0.3156  0.0048  0.0654  0.0641  0.0752  0.06
Perahia 1994   6  0.436  0.027  0.1613  0.4827  0.2417  0.34
Perlemuter 1986   42  0.3149  0.0049  0.0748  0.0758  0.0456  0.05
Poblocka 1999   10  0.4217  0.0014  0.1021  0.3023  0.2819  0.29
Rangell 2001   53  0.2524  0.0054  0.0459  0.0441  0.0562  0.04
Risler 1920   51  0.2738  0.0050  0.0750  0.0730  0.1137  0.09
Rosen 1989   45  0.3051  0.0045  0.0841  0.0829  0.4132  0.18
Rubinstein 1939   34  0.3330  0.0042  0.0843  0.0847  0.0550  0.06
Rubinstein 1952   33  0.3464  0.0034  0.0934  0.0945  0.0549  0.07
Rubinstein 1966   37  0.3357  0.0041  0.0749  0.0753  0.0551  0.06
Rummel 1943   43  0.3160  0.0031  0.0931  0.1726  0.1931  0.18
Shebanova 2002   32  0.3426  0.0040  0.0842  0.0839  0.0748  0.07
Smith 1975   12  0.4125  0.0019  0.0816  0.3424  0.2021  0.26
Szpilman 1948   48  0.3031  0.0052  0.0745  0.0743  0.0743  0.07
Uninsky 1971   15  0.405  0.038  0.148  0.5613  0.545  0.55
Wasowski 1980   16  0.4047  0.0024  0.0625  0.2635  0.1033  0.16
Weissenberg 1971   24  0.3727  0.0036  0.0747  0.0743  0.0745  0.07
Random 1    63  0.0561  0.0063  0.0264  0.025  0.4438  0.09
Random 2   62  0.0742  0.0064  0.0263  0.029  0.4540  0.09
Random 3   65  0.0440  0.0065  0.0265  0.0229  0.1457  0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).