Ezaki 2006

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   52  0.2937  0.0054  0.0652  0.0631  0.1140  0.08
Ashkenazy 1981   37  0.3824  0.0039  0.1039  0.1037  0.0741  0.08
Beliavsky 2004   59  0.2255  0.0060  0.0649  0.0646  0.0748  0.06
BenOr 1989   1  0.661  0.231  0.223  0.685  0.695  0.68
Biret 1990   15  0.4821  0.0018  0.2418  0.536  0.5118  0.52
Blet 2003   26  0.4126  0.0020  0.1220  0.5122  0.4821  0.49
Block 1995   33  0.3953  0.0032  0.1332  0.2636  0.0734  0.13
Brailowsky 1960   13  0.4934  0.0011  0.2513  0.6214  0.6013  0.61
Chiu 1999   30  0.4016  0.0035  0.1135  0.1123  0.3031  0.18
Clidat 1994   41  0.3515  0.0047  0.0747  0.0739  0.0743  0.07
Cohen 1997   61  0.1361  0.0061  0.0361  0.0363  0.0265  0.02
Coop 1987   10  0.519  0.0215  0.1812  0.6215  0.5016  0.56
Cortot 1951   62  0.1329  0.0062  0.0362  0.0352  0.0562  0.04
Czerny 1949   12  0.5027  0.0012  0.169  0.656  0.724  0.68
Czerny 1949b   21  0.4462  0.0023  0.1124  0.4811  0.6117  0.54
Ezaki 2006   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Falvay 1989   19  0.4436  0.0022  0.1219  0.5219  0.4819  0.50
Ferenczy 1958   3  0.633  0.154  0.432  0.771  0.851  0.81
Fiorentino 1962   28  0.4146  0.0029  0.1725  0.4817  0.5023  0.49
Fliere 1977   32  0.396  0.0327  0.1129  0.3320  0.3727  0.35
Fou 1978   4  0.612  0.202  0.277  0.667  0.677  0.66
Francois 1956   46  0.3365  0.0042  0.0845  0.0834  0.0745  0.07
Hatto 1997   48  0.3222  0.0051  0.1038  0.1047  0.0542  0.07
Horowitz 1971   22  0.4438  0.0026  0.0827  0.4123  0.3226  0.36
Horowitz 1985   31  0.3954  0.0030  0.1430  0.2927  0.2330  0.26
Indjic 2001   51  0.3040  0.0052  0.0844  0.0848  0.0551  0.06
Kapell 1951   18  0.4450  0.0019  0.1421  0.5113  0.5020  0.50
Kiepura 1999   16  0.4713  0.0121  0.1222  0.5015  0.4624  0.48
Kilenyi 1937   9  0.5225  0.008  0.3410  0.639  0.6611  0.64
Kissin 1993   53  0.2812  0.0156  0.0559  0.0551  0.0458  0.04
Kitain 1937   60  0.2242  0.0053  0.0558  0.0549  0.0556  0.05
Kushner 1990   14  0.4944  0.0010  0.2015  0.6012  0.5914  0.59
Levy 1951   23  0.4330  0.0017  0.1816  0.594  0.6612  0.62
Luisada 1990   44  0.3358  0.0041  0.0843  0.0839  0.0744  0.07
Lushtak 2004   34  0.3911  0.0138  0.1037  0.1022  0.2232  0.15
Lympany 1968   42  0.3433  0.0043  0.0653  0.0642  0.0646  0.06
Magaloff 1977   54  0.2760  0.0055  0.0555  0.0545  0.0459  0.04
Magaloff 1977b   58  0.2249  0.0059  0.0556  0.0562  0.0361  0.04
Magin 1975   11  0.5119  0.0013  0.256  0.6611  0.6210  0.64
Milkina 1970   24  0.4317  0.0031  0.1231  0.2639  0.0733  0.13
Mohovich 1999   49  0.3241  0.0046  0.0651  0.0644  0.0652  0.06
Nadelmann 1956   36  0.3851  0.0033  0.1733  0.1750  0.0536  0.09
Ohlsson 1999   50  0.3156  0.0050  0.0748  0.0762  0.0454  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   25  0.4247  0.0024  0.1123  0.4918  0.5022  0.49
Olejniczak 1991   35  0.3948  0.0028  0.1526  0.4422  0.2728  0.34
Osinska 1989   7  0.588  0.027  0.404  0.686  0.666  0.67
Paderewski 1912   57  0.2343  0.0057  0.0560  0.0546  0.0460  0.04
Perahia 1994   29  0.4110  0.0236  0.1334  0.1332  0.1235  0.12
Perlemuter 1986   38  0.3763  0.0034  0.1036  0.1059  0.0449  0.06
Poblocka 1999   8  0.5418  0.009  0.3811  0.625  0.699  0.65
Rangell 2001   45  0.3331  0.0045  0.0557  0.0545  0.0557  0.05
Risler 1920   55  0.2757  0.0048  0.0746  0.0750  0.0547  0.06
Rosen 1989   2  0.634  0.123  0.408  0.655  0.678  0.66
Rubinstein 1939   43  0.3414  0.0140  0.1040  0.1038  0.0637  0.08
Rubinstein 1952   27  0.4120  0.0025  0.1028  0.4131  0.2029  0.29
Rubinstein 1966   17  0.4645  0.0014  0.1614  0.6122  0.3825  0.48
Rummel 1943   56  0.2435  0.0058  0.0654  0.0653  0.0455  0.05
Shebanova 2002   5  0.615  0.125  0.311  0.801  0.832  0.81
Smith 1975   47  0.3223  0.0049  0.0650  0.0660  0.0453  0.05
Szpilman 1948   20  0.4432  0.0016  0.1817  0.5613  0.6015  0.58
Uninsky 1971   39  0.3628  0.0044  0.0942  0.0958  0.0450  0.06
Wasowski 1980   6  0.607  0.026  0.275  0.663  0.713  0.68
Weissenberg 1971   40  0.3539  0.0037  0.0941  0.0940  0.0738  0.08
Random 1    63  0.0052  0.0063  0.0363  0.0321  0.2439  0.08
Random 2   65  -0.1259  0.0065  0.0265  0.0264  0.0263  0.02
Random 3   64  -0.0764  0.0064  0.0264  0.0264  0.0264  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).