Biret 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		52	0.34	42	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	32	0.10	55	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.44	15	0.01	36	0.07	34	0.07	18	0.37	31	0.16
Beliavsky 2004		47	0.37	13	0.01	49	0.05	52	0.05	18	0.37	36	0.14
BenOr 1989		1	0.56	1	0.45	1	0.44	1	0.80	6	0.68	1	0.74
Biret 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blet 2003		46	0.37	55	0.00	42	0.05	50	0.05	34	0.08	52	0.06
Block 1995		20	0.43	32	0.00	33	0.06	46	0.06	18	0.33	37	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.43	8	0.02	19	0.07	13	0.38	30	0.30	18	0.34
Chiu 1999		33	0.40	50	0.00	43	0.05	53	0.05	21	0.35	40	0.13
Clidat 1994		8	0.46	35	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.34	19	0.34	20	0.34
Cohen 1997		61	0.25	56	0.00	61	0.06	42	0.06	31	0.15	46	0.09
Coop 1987		5	0.49	22	0.00	6	0.24	4	0.58	27	0.38	6	0.47
Cortot 1951		62	0.23	44	0.00	62	0.05	49	0.05	43	0.06	60	0.05
Czerny 1949		58	0.31	62	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	41	0.07	54	0.06
Czerny 1949b		57	0.31	57	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	39	0.07	51	0.06
Ezaki 2006		6	0.48	6	0.02	7	0.21	6	0.51	18	0.53	5	0.52
Falvay 1989		39	0.39	59	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.12	43	0.06	47	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.42	45	0.00	16	0.08	12	0.38	20	0.50	8	0.44
Fiorentino 1962		35	0.39	46	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.07	20	0.41	30	0.17
Fliere 1977		34	0.39	33	0.00	35	0.06	44	0.06	26	0.27	39	0.13
Fou 1978		38	0.39	10	0.01	34	0.06	41	0.06	26	0.39	33	0.15
Francois 1956		59	0.30	41	0.00	58	0.03	62	0.03	37	0.06	63	0.04
Hatto 1997		53	0.34	63	0.00	55	0.06	40	0.06	46	0.06	53	0.06
Horowitz 1971		10	0.45	21	0.00	10	0.09	9	0.42	14	0.47	9	0.44
Horowitz 1985		32	0.40	36	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.19	20	0.31	24	0.24
Indjic 2001		54	0.34	60	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.07	58	0.05
Kapell 1951		31	0.40	31	0.00	25	0.07	20	0.25	16	0.48	16	0.35
Kiepura 1999		29	0.41	49	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	28	0.17	35	0.14
Kilenyi 1937		11	0.45	9	0.02	5	0.22	5	0.57	14	0.60	4	0.58
Kissin 1993		27	0.41	11	0.01	46	0.07	37	0.07	34	0.11	45	0.09
Kitain 1937		60	0.26	54	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	34	0.09	50	0.07
Kushner 1990		17	0.43	4	0.04	12	0.08	22	0.23	29	0.21	25	0.22
Levy 1951		43	0.39	25	0.00	45	0.07	39	0.07	25	0.33	32	0.15
Luisada 1990		50	0.35	39	0.00	52	0.06	45	0.06	29	0.18	44	0.10
Lushtak 2004		9	0.45	18	0.00	14	0.07	16	0.34	19	0.34	21	0.34
Lympany 1968		18	0.43	26	0.00	22	0.07	25	0.22	13	0.53	17	0.34
Magaloff 1977		37	0.39	47	0.00	44	0.06	47	0.06	16	0.38	34	0.15
Magaloff 1977b		41	0.39	48	0.00	40	0.05	56	0.05	9	0.39	38	0.14
Magin 1975		26	0.41	27	0.00	11	0.08	11	0.38	26	0.35	15	0.36
Milkina 1970		4	0.50	3	0.10	4	0.25	8	0.45	24	0.32	12	0.38
Mohovich 1999		56	0.32	34	0.00	59	0.03	61	0.03	56	0.05	62	0.04
Nadelmann 1956		14	0.44	19	0.00	23	0.10	21	0.24	43	0.06	42	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.42	43	0.00	17	0.08	17	0.32	14	0.36	19	0.34
Olejniczac 1990		30	0.40	37	0.00	39	0.09	33	0.09	25	0.34	29	0.17
Olejniczak 1991		21	0.43	29	0.00	29	0.10	23	0.23	19	0.31	22	0.27
Osinska 1989		3	0.52	7	0.02	3	0.23	3	0.67	18	0.50	3	0.58
Paderewski 1912		40	0.39	5	0.03	9	0.09	29	0.17	9	0.41	23	0.26
Perahia 1994		15	0.44	24	0.00	18	0.08	24	0.22	29	0.18	27	0.20
Perlemuter 1986		25	0.41	40	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.07	33	0.08	49	0.07
Poblocka 1999		42	0.39	14	0.01	27	0.08	27	0.19	29	0.20	28	0.19
Rangell 2001		55	0.32	52	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	38	0.06	59	0.05
Risler 1920		44	0.38	17	0.01	24	0.07	18	0.28	2	0.59	11	0.41
Rosen 1989		36	0.39	16	0.01	26	0.08	19	0.26	22	0.57	14	0.38
Rubinstein 1939		23	0.42	23	0.00	13	0.07	26	0.19	33	0.09	41	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		7	0.48	12	0.01	8	0.17	7	0.49	22	0.43	7	0.46
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.54	2	0.18	2	0.39	2	0.74	11	0.55	2	0.64
Rummel 1943		49	0.35	61	0.00	47	0.07	35	0.07	27	0.18	43	0.11
Shebanova 2002		12	0.44	28	0.00	20	0.07	10	0.41	25	0.35	13	0.38
Smith 1975		51	0.35	51	0.00	41	0.05	54	0.05	36	0.06	57	0.05
Szpilman 1948		48	0.36	38	0.00	50	0.04	58	0.04	33	0.11	48	0.07
Uninsky 1971		16	0.43	20	0.00	21	0.07	14	0.36	16	0.49	10	0.42
Wasowski 1980		45	0.38	53	0.00	53	0.06	43	0.06	55	0.04	56	0.05
Weissenberg 1971		28	0.41	30	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.12	20	0.34	26	0.20
Random 1		63	-0.02	58	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	37	0.05	61	0.04
Random 2		65	-0.12	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		64	-0.04	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	46	0.04	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).