BenOr 1989

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   54  0.3140  0.0056  0.0558  0.0554  0.0558  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   32  0.4346  0.0039  0.1533  0.1516  0.4033  0.24
Beliavsky 2004   57  0.2858  0.0057  0.0560  0.0536  0.0951  0.07
BenOr 1989   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Biret 1990   10  0.5610  0.0112  0.256  0.681  0.803  0.74
Blet 2003   18  0.5043  0.0018  0.1316  0.587  0.7015  0.64
Block 1995   17  0.5125  0.0021  0.1318  0.573  0.6218  0.59
Brailowsky 1960   6  0.5826  0.009  0.349  0.662  0.765  0.71
Chiu 1999   36  0.4141  0.0034  0.0940  0.0912  0.4736  0.21
Clidat 1994   44  0.3864  0.0048  0.0749  0.0737  0.0752  0.07
Cohen 1997   61  0.2056  0.0060  0.0461  0.0444  0.0660  0.05
Coop 1987   11  0.567  0.0314  0.243  0.756  0.619  0.68
Cortot 1951   62  0.0852  0.0062  0.0362  0.0361  0.0265  0.02
Czerny 1949   43  0.3847  0.0030  0.0930  0.2228  0.2335  0.22
Czerny 1949b   55  0.3138  0.0052  0.0744  0.0733  0.0949  0.08
Ezaki 2006   2  0.663  0.092  0.375  0.693  0.687  0.68
Falvay 1989   8  0.579  0.0110  0.154  0.692  0.774  0.73
Ferenczy 1958   9  0.5631  0.008  0.2712  0.637  0.6812  0.65
Fiorentino 1962   29  0.4434  0.0033  0.1534  0.1514  0.5430  0.28
Fliere 1977   42  0.3962  0.0040  0.0937  0.0921  0.3639  0.18
Fou 1978   5  0.5914  0.005  0.2710  0.652  0.728  0.68
Francois 1956   38  0.3955  0.0042  0.0939  0.0911  0.4737  0.21
Hatto 1997   52  0.3544  0.0054  0.0842  0.0831  0.1745  0.12
Horowitz 1971   37  0.4137  0.0035  0.0841  0.0827  0.2643  0.14
Horowitz 1985   40  0.3942  0.0031  0.0832  0.1526  0.2538  0.19
Indjic 2001   48  0.3624  0.0053  0.0650  0.0637  0.0954  0.07
Kapell 1951   22  0.4922  0.0017  0.1323  0.536  0.5923  0.56
Kiepura 1999   33  0.4259  0.0032  0.1031  0.2018  0.3331  0.26
Kilenyi 1937   13  0.5330  0.0013  0.3114  0.616  0.7013  0.65
Kissin 1993   60  0.2348  0.0061  0.0655  0.0661  0.0361  0.04
Kitain 1937   58  0.2749  0.0058  0.0651  0.0633  0.1050  0.08
Kushner 1990   7  0.5712  0.016  0.187  0.683  0.756  0.71
Levy 1951   34  0.4227  0.0027  0.1128  0.355  0.6526  0.48
Luisada 1990   45  0.3754  0.0045  0.0746  0.0725  0.2344  0.13
Lushtak 2004   41  0.3935  0.0043  0.0652  0.0635  0.0953  0.07
Lympany 1968   35  0.4220  0.0037  0.1135  0.1114  0.5232  0.24
Magaloff 1977   47  0.3650  0.0049  0.0748  0.0713  0.4240  0.17
Magaloff 1977b   50  0.3518  0.0047  0.0556  0.058  0.4142  0.14
Magin 1975   23  0.4916  0.0020  0.1421  0.5517  0.5424  0.54
Milkina 1970   15  0.524  0.0915  0.2215  0.6012  0.6017  0.60
Mohovich 1999   31  0.4323  0.0038  0.1036  0.1017  0.5134  0.23
Nadelmann 1956   28  0.4513  0.0122  0.1224  0.5115  0.3128  0.40
Ohlsson 1999   30  0.4336  0.0036  0.0938  0.0925  0.2241  0.14
Olejniczac 1990   26  0.4645  0.0029  0.1227  0.3514  0.6227  0.47
Olejniczak 1991   20  0.5019  0.0023  0.1422  0.549  0.6319  0.58
Osinska 1989   1  0.691  0.451  0.442  0.831  0.841  0.83
Paderewski 1912   56  0.3065  0.0055  0.0653  0.0655  0.0459  0.05
Perahia 1994   27  0.4653  0.0028  0.1029  0.3217  0.4129  0.36
Perlemuter 1986   24  0.4921  0.0025  0.1425  0.5010  0.5725  0.53
Poblocka 1999   14  0.526  0.037  0.2313  0.627  0.6416  0.63
Rangell 2001   49  0.3560  0.0051  0.0654  0.0629  0.1846  0.10
Risler 1920   53  0.3329  0.0050  0.0745  0.0732  0.1048  0.08
Rosen 1989   3  0.632  0.123  0.458  0.664  0.6811  0.67
Rubinstein 1939   51  0.3528  0.0046  0.0557  0.0544  0.0657  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   21  0.5017  0.0024  0.2019  0.5611  0.5822  0.57
Rubinstein 1966   4  0.625  0.094  0.261  0.842  0.822  0.83
Rummel 1943   59  0.2732  0.0059  0.0559  0.0558  0.0362  0.04
Shebanova 2002   12  0.5415  0.0011  0.1911  0.644  0.7110  0.67
Smith 1975   39  0.3957  0.0044  0.0747  0.0732  0.1247  0.09
Szpilman 1948   19  0.5011  0.0119  0.1020  0.551  0.7514  0.64
Uninsky 1971   46  0.3639  0.0041  0.0743  0.0744  0.0655  0.06
Wasowski 1980   16  0.5151  0.0016  0.1217  0.586  0.5621  0.57
Weissenberg 1971   25  0.478  0.0126  0.1826  0.482  0.6920  0.58
Random 1    64  0.0063  0.0063  0.0264  0.0246  0.0463  0.03
Random 2   65  -0.0133  0.0065  0.0265  0.0244  0.0564  0.03
Random 3   63  0.0261  0.0064  0.0263  0.0226  0.1956  0.06

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).