Rubinstein 1939

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.73	22	0.00	22	0.10	18	0.32	32	0.16	12	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981		28	0.69	16	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.06	40	0.07	41	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		30	0.69	26	0.00	20	0.10	23	0.25	45	0.05	23	0.11
BenOr 1989		23	0.70	44	0.00	34	0.07	37	0.07	54	0.05	42	0.06
Biret 1990		14	0.76	5	0.02	8	0.16	10	0.50	18	0.30	4	0.39
Blet 2003		42	0.67	45	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.17	63	0.04	30	0.08
Block 1995		60	0.55	30	0.00	60	0.03	64	0.03	50	0.06	60	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.76	42	0.00	14	0.11	15	0.35	43	0.06	17	0.14
Chiu 1999		63	0.50	46	0.00	63	0.06	45	0.06	50	0.05	44	0.05
Clidat 1994		25	0.70	12	0.01	26	0.07	24	0.23	61	0.05	25	0.11
Cohen 1997		57	0.56	20	0.00	45	0.06	39	0.06	18	0.28	22	0.13
Coop 1987		56	0.58	36	0.00	57	0.06	47	0.06	56	0.04	49	0.05
Cortot 1951		49	0.61	59	0.00	49	0.06	41	0.06	53	0.04	56	0.05
Czerny 1949		24	0.70	25	0.00	25	0.06	30	0.14	56	0.05	32	0.08
Czerny 1949b		27	0.69	15	0.00	40	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.05	47	0.05
Ezaki 2006		53	0.59	28	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	54	0.05	57	0.04
Falvay 1989		62	0.53	52	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	52	0.06	45	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.58	65	0.00	38	0.05	51	0.05	48	0.05	50	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		37	0.67	47	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.06	61	0.04	55	0.05
Fliere 1977		15	0.74	18	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.33	44	0.06	16	0.14
Fou 1978		43	0.66	10	0.01	39	0.08	35	0.08	55	0.05	37	0.06
Francois 1956		21	0.71	51	0.00	21	0.10	22	0.27	56	0.04	27	0.10
Hatto 1997		35	0.68	54	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.17	63	0.04	31	0.08
Horowitz 1971		10	0.77	23	0.00	13	0.21	9	0.50	28	0.19	7	0.31
Horowitz 1985		6	0.79	24	0.00	12	0.18	12	0.46	4	0.60	3	0.53
Indjic 2001		34	0.68	33	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.17	61	0.04	33	0.08
Kapell 1951		50	0.60	37	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.05
Kiepura 1999		33	0.68	17	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	41	0.06	35	0.06
Kilenyi 1937		51	0.59	64	0.00	55	0.03	61	0.03	58	0.04	64	0.03
Kissin 1993		38	0.67	9	0.01	16	0.09	14	0.38	54	0.05	19	0.14
Kitain 1937		58	0.56	19	0.00	36	0.06	49	0.06	16	0.38	15	0.15
Kushner 1990		5	0.80	21	0.00	6	0.24	7	0.57	44	0.05	14	0.17
Levy 1951		45	0.65	41	0.00	46	0.08	36	0.08	45	0.04	36	0.06
Luisada 1990		26	0.70	35	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.10	62	0.03	53	0.05
Lushtak 2004		32	0.68	27	0.00	30	0.08	26	0.17	43	0.06	26	0.10
Lympany 1968		19	0.71	11	0.01	23	0.09	20	0.30	39	0.06	20	0.13
Magaloff 1977		41	0.67	58	0.00	48	0.09	33	0.09	58	0.04	38	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		40	0.67	34	0.00	47	0.08	34	0.08	60	0.04	40	0.06
Magin 1975		48	0.62	50	0.00	53	0.04	54	0.04	58	0.05	59	0.04
Milkina 1970		2	0.81	3	0.03	3	0.27	5	0.61	20	0.22	5	0.37
Mohovich 1999		7	0.79	31	0.00	4	0.19	4	0.63	33	0.10	10	0.25
Nadelmann 1956		8	0.79	13	0.00	10	0.13	13	0.45	24	0.26	6	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		59	0.55	39	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	63	0.04	63	0.03
Olejniczac 1990		36	0.68	32	0.00	41	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.04	51	0.05
Olejniczak 1991		31	0.68	40	0.00	37	0.05	50	0.05	57	0.05	46	0.05
Osinska 1989		4	0.80	14	0.00	5	0.18	2	0.67	39	0.08	11	0.23
Paderewski 1912		29	0.69	57	0.00	35	0.06	48	0.06	58	0.04	52	0.05
Perahia 1994		11	0.76	4	0.02	2	0.19	6	0.59	4	0.59	2	0.59
Perlemuter 1986		17	0.73	8	0.01	19	0.09	17	0.33	48	0.05	21	0.13
Poblocka 1999		46	0.62	38	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	52	0.06	43	0.05
Rangell 2001		55	0.58	48	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	50	0.05	61	0.04
Risler 1920		52	0.59	43	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04	58	0.04
Rosen 1989		47	0.62	55	0.00	50	0.06	42	0.06	58	0.04	54	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.81	7	0.02	9	0.15	8	0.56	31	0.14	8	0.28
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.88	1	0.74	1	0.73	1	0.88	3	0.73	1	0.80
Rummel 1943		39	0.67	49	0.00	33	0.07	38	0.07	35	0.06	39	0.06
Shebanova 2002		22	0.70	6	0.02	17	0.10	21	0.28	57	0.04	24	0.11
Smith 1975		9	0.78	56	0.00	11	0.12	11	0.49	60	0.04	18	0.14
Szpilman 1948		18	0.72	53	0.00	24	0.06	29	0.15	45	0.05	28	0.09
Uninsky 1971		44	0.66	63	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.12	45	0.06	29	0.08
Wasowski 1980		20	0.71	29	0.00	15	0.09	19	0.31	23	0.21	9	0.26
Weissenberg 1971		61	0.54	60	0.00	61	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.03	62	0.03
Average		12	0.76	2	0.05	7	0.14	3	0.67	54	0.05	13	0.18
Random 1		65	-0.10	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	16	0.26	34	0.07
Random 2		64	0.05	62	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.03	65	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.11	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	39	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).