Fou 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		55	0.76	56	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	35	0.10	54	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		27	0.85	4	0.06	27	0.07	30	0.14	20	0.32	30	0.21
Beliavsky 2004		50	0.78	53	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	42	0.05	59	0.05
BenOr 1989		4	0.92	2	0.20	3	0.54	3	0.74	2	0.71	1	0.72
Biret 1990		58	0.71	37	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.04	64	0.04
Blet 2003		28	0.85	60	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.18	33	0.10	44	0.13
Block 1995		33	0.84	29	0.00	41	0.05	52	0.05	11	0.46	40	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.81	47	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	2	0.68	31	0.20
Chiu 1999		25	0.86	42	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.20	23	0.30	27	0.24
Clidat 1994		21	0.87	17	0.01	13	0.11	15	0.44	8	0.45	14	0.44
Cohen 1997		61	0.57	44	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	30	0.11	52	0.07
Coop 1987		9	0.90	31	0.00	7	0.18	9	0.56	17	0.43	9	0.49
Cortot 1951		39	0.82	27	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.06	3	0.63	33	0.19
Czerny 1949		38	0.83	13	0.01	11	0.10	17	0.39	26	0.31	18	0.35
Czerny 1949b		26	0.85	22	0.00	17	0.11	18	0.39	28	0.24	21	0.31
Ezaki 2006		2	0.94	3	0.10	2	0.33	2	0.76	7	0.63	2	0.69
Falvay 1989		3	0.92	5	0.04	5	0.28	4	0.69	5	0.66	3	0.67
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.78	64	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.07	13	0.43	37	0.17
Fiorentino 1962		20	0.87	55	0.00	25	0.09	24	0.27	22	0.28	25	0.27
Fliere 1977		8	0.91	28	0.00	8	0.23	8	0.61	10	0.45	8	0.52
Fou 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Francois 1956		45	0.80	49	0.00	42	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.37	42	0.14
Hatto 1997		51	0.78	33	0.00	47	0.09	34	0.09	13	0.37	34	0.18
Horowitz 1971		53	0.78	38	0.00	51	0.06	46	0.06	35	0.07	56	0.06
Horowitz 1985		60	0.57	57	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.05	57	0.05
Indjic 2001		49	0.78	48	0.00	48	0.08	35	0.08	14	0.36	38	0.17
Kapell 1951		10	0.89	26	0.00	15	0.14	11	0.49	19	0.42	13	0.45
Kiepura 1999		31	0.84	23	0.00	36	0.06	48	0.06	14	0.46	36	0.17
Kilenyi 1937		12	0.89	54	0.00	12	0.10	13	0.48	22	0.37	15	0.42
Kissin 1993		5	0.92	21	0.00	4	0.25	7	0.61	14	0.36	11	0.47
Kitain 1937		63	0.43	43	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	34	0.06	61	0.05
Kushner 1990		37	0.83	16	0.01	20	0.08	27	0.20	18	0.23	29	0.21
Levy 1951		44	0.80	12	0.01	40	0.05	50	0.05	1	0.69	32	0.19
Luisada 1990		23	0.87	36	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.13	25	0.26	35	0.18
Lushtak 2004		6	0.91	41	0.00	6	0.26	6	0.61	6	0.61	6	0.61
Lympany 1968		30	0.85	52	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.27	7	0.50	16	0.37
Magaloff 1977		22	0.87	9	0.02	34	0.07	42	0.07	28	0.23	45	0.13
Magaloff 1977b		24	0.87	34	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.09	23	0.23	41	0.14
Magin 1975		14	0.89	30	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.29	27	0.38	19	0.33
Milkina 1970		36	0.83	46	0.00	46	0.07	40	0.07	19	0.26	43	0.13
Mohovich 1999		48	0.79	58	0.00	49	0.07	41	0.07	53	0.05	55	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		57	0.75	32	0.00	58	0.08	36	0.08	34	0.07	51	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.81	24	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	45	0.05	62	0.04
Olejniczac 1990		19	0.87	62	0.00	24	0.11	21	0.30	21	0.29	24	0.29
Olejniczak 1991		18	0.87	40	0.00	23	0.10	25	0.26	27	0.21	28	0.23
Osinska 1989		16	0.88	25	0.00	19	0.20	10	0.51	27	0.17	23	0.29
Paderewski 1912		43	0.81	20	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	27	0.24	49	0.12
Perahia 1994		62	0.57	45	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	36	0.06	60	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		32	0.84	39	0.00	10	0.12	19	0.35	19	0.29	20	0.32
Poblocka 1999		7	0.91	11	0.01	9	0.21	5	0.67	14	0.60	4	0.63
Rangell 2001		13	0.89	7	0.02	22	0.09	20	0.33	20	0.42	17	0.37
Risler 1920		47	0.79	63	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	28	0.25	47	0.12
Rosen 1989		11	0.89	8	0.02	14	0.12	12	0.49	2	0.59	7	0.54
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.66	35	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	35	0.08	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.85	14	0.01	28	0.08	28	0.20	7	0.47	22	0.31
Rubinstein 1966		54	0.77	10	0.01	52	0.05	58	0.05	19	0.28	48	0.12
Rummel 1943		56	0.76	19	0.00	30	0.06	32	0.11	4	0.56	26	0.25
Shebanova 2002		15	0.88	6	0.02	16	0.19	14	0.48	10	0.49	10	0.48
Smith 1975		35	0.83	61	0.00	44	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.04	58	0.05
Szpilman 1948		40	0.82	50	0.00	33	0.07	38	0.07	27	0.20	46	0.12
Uninsky 1971		17	0.88	15	0.01	18	0.15	16	0.42	4	0.52	12	0.47
Wasowski 1980		46	0.80	18	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	12	0.43	39	0.15
Weissenberg 1971		34	0.84	51	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.07	37	0.10	50	0.08
Average		1	0.94	1	0.40	1	0.39	1	0.78	12	0.49	5	0.62
Random 1		65	-0.09	59	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	59	0.02	66	0.02
Random 2		64	0.04	66	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	58	0.03	65	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.19	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	20	0.20	63	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).