Blet 2003

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		31	0.82	23	0.00	18	0.07	15	0.26	14	0.50	8	0.36
Ashkenazy 1981		29	0.82	39	0.00	47	0.07	39	0.07	44	0.06	58	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		52	0.77	7	0.02	20	0.07	32	0.12	6	0.49	21	0.24
BenOr 1989		5	0.87	38	0.00	14	0.07	13	0.29	30	0.18	24	0.23
Biret 1990		45	0.80	40	0.00	50	0.05	54	0.05	23	0.22	45	0.10
Blet 2003		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Block 1995		40	0.81	5	0.03	52	0.05	53	0.05	36	0.09	54	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.80	45	0.00	39	0.05	51	0.05	12	0.45	33	0.15
Chiu 1999		34	0.82	49	0.00	45	0.06	40	0.06	39	0.08	52	0.07
Clidat 1994		9	0.86	8	0.02	9	0.10	9	0.34	13	0.37	10	0.35
Cohen 1997		60	0.68	9	0.02	53	0.04	57	0.04	1	0.59	35	0.15
Coop 1987		14	0.86	25	0.00	33	0.09	35	0.09	36	0.11	43	0.10
Cortot 1951		48	0.79	54	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	14	0.39	41	0.12
Czerny 1949		53	0.77	36	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.34	27	0.27	15	0.30
Czerny 1949b		41	0.81	60	0.00	8	0.16	7	0.40	25	0.29	11	0.34
Ezaki 2006		4	0.87	18	0.01	10	0.07	11	0.31	33	0.10	27	0.18
Falvay 1989		30	0.82	35	0.00	44	0.06	41	0.06	34	0.11	46	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		32	0.82	48	0.00	37	0.10	34	0.10	20	0.31	28	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		18	0.85	37	0.00	30	0.07	24	0.16	28	0.17	32	0.16
Fliere 1977		6	0.87	13	0.01	5	0.11	4	0.48	19	0.33	4	0.40
Fou 1978		19	0.85	62	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.10	29	0.18	37	0.13
Francois 1956		51	0.77	6	0.02	27	0.06	29	0.15	5	0.49	17	0.27
Hatto 1997		37	0.81	28	0.00	22	0.06	20	0.20	7	0.48	13	0.31
Horowitz 1971		15	0.85	20	0.00	15	0.07	16	0.23	6	0.55	9	0.36
Horowitz 1985		58	0.69	11	0.01	61	0.06	44	0.06	15	0.47	30	0.17
Indjic 2001		38	0.81	21	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.20	7	0.48	14	0.31
Kapell 1951		8	0.86	53	0.00	21	0.07	17	0.23	44	0.06	39	0.12
Kiepura 1999		50	0.78	16	0.01	54	0.04	58	0.04	37	0.06	59	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		13	0.86	14	0.01	6	0.13	5	0.46	24	0.34	5	0.40
Kissin 1993		2	0.90	4	0.03	2	0.26	3	0.61	24	0.23	6	0.37
Kitain 1937		63	0.44	51	0.00	62	0.04	60	0.04	21	0.31	42	0.11
Kushner 1990		20	0.85	17	0.01	19	0.06	14	0.27	13	0.32	16	0.29
Levy 1951		57	0.71	63	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	52	0.04	62	0.04
Luisada 1990		10	0.86	58	0.00	12	0.09	10	0.33	13	0.41	7	0.37
Lushtak 2004		12	0.86	61	0.00	32	0.08	26	0.15	34	0.09	40	0.12
Lympany 1968		7	0.87	10	0.01	31	0.08	23	0.17	15	0.41	18	0.26
Magaloff 1977		11	0.86	34	0.00	24	0.08	30	0.14	24	0.25	26	0.19
Magaloff 1977b		16	0.85	42	0.00	25	0.07	31	0.12	16	0.27	29	0.18
Magin 1975		39	0.81	27	0.00	51	0.06	43	0.06	37	0.08	53	0.07
Milkina 1970		26	0.83	22	0.00	28	0.06	25	0.15	12	0.44	19	0.26
Mohovich 1999		35	0.81	41	0.00	35	0.08	36	0.08	35	0.08	51	0.08
Nadelmann 1956		47	0.79	3	0.05	17	0.08	28	0.15	9	0.41	20	0.25
Ohlsson 1999		46	0.79	50	0.00	58	0.05	47	0.05	35	0.07	57	0.06
Olejniczac 1990		17	0.85	32	0.00	26	0.06	18	0.23	26	0.21	25	0.22
Olejniczak 1991		21	0.84	52	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.07	38	0.09	47	0.08
Osinska 1989		3	0.89	29	0.00	3	0.17	2	0.62	15	0.33	2	0.45
Paderewski 1912		54	0.76	44	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	53	0.04	63	0.04
Perahia 1994		62	0.60	66	0.00	63	0.05	46	0.05	40	0.06	61	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		42	0.80	12	0.01	4	0.16	6	0.44	13	0.40	3	0.42
Poblocka 1999		24	0.84	56	0.00	42	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.08	56	0.06
Rangell 2001		33	0.82	55	0.00	48	0.07	38	0.07	38	0.07	55	0.07
Risler 1920		36	0.81	26	0.00	41	0.04	56	0.04	22	0.38	38	0.12
Rosen 1989		27	0.83	30	0.00	38	0.05	50	0.05	12	0.37	36	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.67	43	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	25	0.17	48	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		44	0.80	19	0.01	29	0.07	22	0.17	17	0.34	22	0.24
Rubinstein 1966		55	0.75	24	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	30	0.17	50	0.08
Rummel 1943		59	0.69	15	0.01	40	0.06	42	0.06	13	0.40	34	0.15
Shebanova 2002		28	0.83	33	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.05	60	0.05
Smith 1975		23	0.84	46	0.00	13	0.08	19	0.22	25	0.24	23	0.23
Szpilman 1948		22	0.84	47	0.00	11	0.07	12	0.29	17	0.35	12	0.32
Uninsky 1971		49	0.79	2	0.06	16	0.06	27	0.15	23	0.20	31	0.17
Wasowski 1980		56	0.73	59	0.00	59	0.03	64	0.03	55	0.04	64	0.03
Weissenberg 1971		25	0.83	57	0.00	43	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.12	49	0.08
Average		1	0.92	1	0.59	1	0.58	1	0.77	20	0.37	1	0.53
Random 1		65	-0.13	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	49	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.09	31	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	13	0.25	44	0.10
Random 3		66	-0.16	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	53	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).