Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   41  0.818  0.0316  0.1016  0.384  0.608  0.48
Ashkenazy 1981   25  0.8423  0.0032  0.0532  0.1026  0.2139  0.14
Beliavsky 2004   45  0.7955  0.0054  0.0733  0.0721  0.2838  0.14
BenOr 1989   5  0.8817  0.0110  0.115  0.5819  0.369  0.46
Biret 1990   47  0.7940  0.0043  0.0547  0.0512  0.3941  0.14
Blet 2003   24  0.8449  0.0025  0.0925  0.2517  0.2424  0.24
Block 1995   60  0.7258  0.0060  0.0461  0.0453  0.0563  0.04
Brailowsky 1960   42  0.8032  0.0051  0.0460  0.0419  0.3147  0.11
Chiu 1999   55  0.7659  0.0050  0.0549  0.0540  0.0852  0.06
Clidat 1994   8  0.8831  0.0012  0.1012  0.479  0.4212  0.44
Cohen 1997   62  0.5353  0.0062  0.0639  0.0652  0.0459  0.05
Coop 1987   31  0.833  0.117  0.1217  0.3744  0.0731  0.16
Cortot 1951   58  0.7454  0.0059  0.0462  0.0434  0.0661  0.05
Czerny 1949   13  0.8638  0.0013  0.1110  0.4923  0.3514  0.41
Czerny 1949b   9  0.8718  0.0111  0.1111  0.4919  0.4011  0.44
Ezaki 2006   28  0.8460  0.0037  0.0637  0.0642  0.0751  0.06
Falvay 1989   46  0.799  0.0249  0.0542  0.0537  0.0853  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   59  0.7361  0.0040  0.0635  0.0623  0.2845  0.13
Fiorentino 1962   19  0.8547  0.0030  0.1022  0.2738  0.0836  0.15
Fliere 1977   3  0.906  0.043  0.213  0.627  0.503  0.56
Fou 1978   29  0.8363  0.0036  0.0458  0.0446  0.0656  0.05
Francois 1956   30  0.8312  0.0142  0.0457  0.048  0.4742  0.14
Hatto 1997   52  0.7757  0.0024  0.0831  0.1816  0.3621  0.25
Horowitz 1971   35  0.8242  0.0039  0.0541  0.0516  0.3840  0.14
Horowitz 1985   56  0.7420  0.0058  0.0551  0.0510  0.5429  0.16
Indjic 2001   51  0.7736  0.0023  0.0730  0.1814  0.3623  0.25
Kapell 1951   20  0.8521  0.0018  0.0918  0.3420  0.3517  0.34
Kiepura 1999   44  0.7927  0.0055  0.0544  0.0550  0.0554  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   16  0.8615  0.0117  0.108  0.5524  0.3413  0.43
Kissin 1993   11  0.862  0.132  0.274  0.6118  0.3310  0.45
Kitain 1937   61  0.5526  0.0061  0.0553  0.059  0.4535  0.15
Kushner 1990   7  0.8837  0.008  0.126  0.577  0.445  0.50
Levy 1951   50  0.7710  0.0253  0.0540  0.0511  0.5030  0.16
Luisada 1990   12  0.8651  0.0031  0.0929  0.2031  0.1528  0.17
Lushtak 2004   14  0.8625  0.0019  0.0814  0.4224  0.1920  0.28
Lympany 1968   27  0.8433  0.0035  0.0456  0.0419  0.3346  0.11
Magaloff 1977   21  0.8435  0.0021  0.0923  0.2625  0.2522  0.25
Magaloff 1977b   23  0.8443  0.0022  0.0826  0.2324  0.2226  0.22
Magin 1975   37  0.8264  0.0047  0.0543  0.0546  0.0655  0.05
Milkina 1970   10  0.8734  0.006  0.127  0.554  0.584  0.56
Mohovich 1999   2  0.9114  0.014  0.272  0.703  0.601  0.65
Nadelmann 1956   32  0.8362  0.0034  0.0555  0.056  0.4433  0.15
Ohlsson 1999   53  0.7719  0.0045  0.0550  0.0526  0.1949  0.10
Olejniczac 1990   18  0.8648  0.0029  0.0921  0.2932  0.1227  0.19
Olejniczak 1991   15  0.8639  0.0020  0.0915  0.3927  0.2219  0.29
Osinska 1989   1  0.911  0.351  0.341  0.706  0.562  0.63
Paderewski 1912   22  0.845  0.0414  0.1019  0.315  0.4616  0.38
Perahia 1994   57  0.7413  0.0148  0.0545  0.058  0.5332  0.16
Perlemuter 1986   6  0.884  0.085  0.199  0.539  0.456  0.49
Poblocka 1999   26  0.8465  0.0041  0.0734  0.0734  0.1050  0.08
Rangell 2001   40  0.8152  0.0033  0.0554  0.0543  0.0660  0.05
Risler 1920   34  0.8228  0.0044  0.0548  0.0522  0.3644  0.13
Rosen 1989   39  0.8146  0.0052  0.0546  0.0550  0.0558  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   48  0.7824  0.0046  0.0459  0.0410  0.4937  0.14
Rubinstein 1952   17  0.8616  0.0127  0.0920  0.2911  0.4018  0.34
Rubinstein 1966   36  0.8222  0.0026  0.0824  0.257  0.5715  0.38
Rummel 1943   54  0.7744  0.0057  0.0636  0.0614  0.3634  0.15
Shebanova 2002   33  0.8329  0.0038  0.0552  0.0538  0.0657  0.05
Smith 1975   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Szpilman 1948   4  0.887  0.039  0.1113  0.457  0.517  0.48
Uninsky 1971   43  0.8041  0.0015  0.1128  0.2150  0.0648  0.11
Wasowski 1980   49  0.7830  0.0056  0.0638  0.0619  0.2943  0.13
Weissenberg 1971   38  0.8111  0.0128  0.1127  0.2124  0.2425  0.22
Random 1    64  -0.1350  0.0064  0.0264  0.0257  0.0265  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0756  0.0063  0.0463  0.0439  0.0462  0.04
Random 3   65  -0.1545  0.0065  0.0265  0.0238  0.0464  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).