Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   49  0.7625  0.0047  0.0553  0.0528  0.2041  0.10
Ashkenazy 1981   29  0.8238  0.0043  0.0736  0.0735  0.0850  0.07
Beliavsky 2004   38  0.8055  0.0050  0.0739  0.0720  0.3133  0.15
BenOr 1989   10  0.8615  0.0120  0.0820  0.3235  0.0929  0.17
Biret 1990   33  0.817  0.0219  0.0917  0.362  0.598  0.46
Blet 2003   31  0.8151  0.0033  0.0835  0.0835  0.0846  0.08
Block 1995   57  0.7137  0.0056  0.0362  0.0340  0.0760  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   36  0.8030  0.0048  0.0549  0.0520  0.2937  0.12
Chiu 1999   54  0.7245  0.0039  0.0551  0.0550  0.0558  0.05
Clidat 1994   22  0.8333  0.0036  0.0738  0.0742  0.0655  0.06
Cohen 1997   62  0.4832  0.0062  0.0647  0.0630  0.1148  0.08
Coop 1987   27  0.825  0.046  0.226  0.4920  0.3610  0.42
Cortot 1951   55  0.7148  0.0060  0.0457  0.0463  0.0363  0.03
Czerny 1949   7  0.8757  0.0010  0.138  0.4821  0.3611  0.42
Czerny 1949b   8  0.8740  0.0012  0.1016  0.3729  0.2519  0.30
Ezaki 2006   26  0.8224  0.0034  0.0742  0.0735  0.0945  0.08
Falvay 1989   52  0.7422  0.0044  0.0644  0.0647  0.0651  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   60  0.6920  0.0028  0.0826  0.1719  0.3224  0.23
Fiorentino 1962   14  0.8541  0.0025  0.0924  0.2932  0.1128  0.18
Fliere 1977   9  0.8628  0.0011  0.099  0.4836  0.0826  0.20
Fou 1978   40  0.7954  0.0042  0.0552  0.0540  0.0752  0.06
Francois 1956   25  0.8218  0.0049  0.0740  0.0717  0.3531  0.16
Hatto 1997   59  0.7135  0.0046  0.0741  0.0731  0.1243  0.09
Horowitz 1971   30  0.8117  0.0135  0.0737  0.0718  0.3730  0.16
Horowitz 1985   51  0.7529  0.0054  0.0459  0.0411  0.5332  0.15
Indjic 2001   58  0.7146  0.0045  0.0648  0.0631  0.1344  0.09
Kapell 1951   19  0.846  0.037  0.2314  0.4119  0.3513  0.38
Kiepura 1999   45  0.7864  0.0053  0.0550  0.0540  0.0657  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   20  0.8310  0.0115  0.1111  0.4830  0.2417  0.34
Kissin 1993   23  0.832  0.202  0.264  0.5412  0.407  0.46
Kitain 1937   61  0.5221  0.0061  0.0455  0.0415  0.3940  0.12
Kushner 1990   3  0.904  0.053  0.252  0.734  0.602  0.66
Levy 1951   56  0.7152  0.0057  0.0363  0.0333  0.0759  0.05
Luisada 1990   4  0.8850  0.0013  0.1112  0.4515  0.3812  0.41
Lushtak 2004   24  0.8331  0.0032  0.0629  0.1235  0.0942  0.10
Lympany 1968   21  0.8336  0.0031  0.0630  0.1222  0.2927  0.19
Magaloff 1977   39  0.7956  0.0051  0.0646  0.0649  0.0653  0.06
Magaloff 1977b   41  0.7965  0.0052  0.0643  0.0641  0.0756  0.06
Magin 1975   32  0.8126  0.0037  0.0934  0.0932  0.1538  0.12
Milkina 1970   18  0.8411  0.0123  0.0825  0.2510  0.4816  0.35
Mohovich 1999   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Nadelmann 1956   17  0.8427  0.0016  0.0718  0.349  0.4014  0.37
Ohlsson 1999   47  0.7643  0.0027  0.0727  0.1522  0.3225  0.22
Olejniczac 1990   13  0.8534  0.0024  0.0821  0.3045  0.0635  0.13
Olejniczak 1991   12  0.8542  0.0014  0.1113  0.4423  0.3015  0.36
Osinska 1989   1  0.921  0.371  0.361  0.803  0.641  0.72
Paderewski 1912   15  0.8444  0.0041  0.0645  0.0628  0.2439  0.12
Perahia 1994   44  0.7812  0.0129  0.0631  0.121  0.6421  0.28
Perlemuter 1986   6  0.883  0.144  0.245  0.5214  0.399  0.45
Poblocka 1999   16  0.8423  0.0017  0.0722  0.3026  0.2422  0.27
Rangell 2001   42  0.7953  0.0026  0.0728  0.1532  0.1236  0.13
Risler 1920   34  0.8058  0.0040  0.0554  0.0526  0.3434  0.13
Rosen 1989   53  0.7439  0.0055  0.0360  0.0351  0.0562  0.04
Rubinstein 1939   43  0.7916  0.0138  0.1033  0.103  0.6323  0.25
Rubinstein 1952   11  0.858  0.028  0.177  0.495  0.564  0.52
Rubinstein 1966   35  0.809  0.0122  0.0915  0.395  0.625  0.49
Rummel 1943   50  0.7660  0.0058  0.0361  0.0320  0.2447  0.08
Shebanova 2002   28  0.8214  0.0121  0.0819  0.3221  0.2920  0.30
Smith 1975   2  0.9119  0.005  0.263  0.602  0.703  0.65
Szpilman 1948   5  0.8813  0.019  0.1210  0.4814  0.446  0.46
Uninsky 1971   46  0.7659  0.0030  0.0632  0.1257  0.0449  0.07
Wasowski 1980   48  0.7649  0.0059  0.0456  0.0441  0.0561  0.04
Weissenberg 1971   37  0.8047  0.0018  0.0823  0.2917  0.3618  0.32
Random 1    64  -0.1563  0.0064  0.0264  0.0260  0.0264  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0462  0.0063  0.0458  0.0431  0.1054  0.06
Random 3   65  -0.1961  0.0065  0.0265  0.0254  0.0365  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).