Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   23  0.8323  0.0118  0.1317  0.3514  0.508  0.42
Ashkenazy 1981   30  0.8117  0.0142  0.0543  0.0534  0.0852  0.06
Beliavsky 2004   42  0.7943  0.0026  0.0924  0.1722  0.2720  0.21
BenOr 1989   8  0.8516  0.0112  0.198  0.5354  0.0524  0.16
Biret 1990   48  0.7821  0.0140  0.0545  0.0523  0.2033  0.10
Blet 2003   16  0.837  0.039  0.1312  0.4427  0.1714  0.27
Block 1995   59  0.7233  0.0059  0.0361  0.0337  0.0762  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   9  0.8526  0.0129  0.0629  0.1214  0.4418  0.23
Chiu 1999   58  0.7339  0.0054  0.0552  0.0555  0.0555  0.05
Clidat 1994   11  0.8411  0.026  0.186  0.5520  0.2810  0.39
Cohen 1997   61  0.6520  0.0160  0.0363  0.0310  0.4931  0.12
Coop 1987   46  0.7827  0.0044  0.0733  0.0745  0.0742  0.07
Cortot 1951   39  0.8047  0.0057  0.0362  0.0327  0.1645  0.07
Czerny 1949   45  0.7951  0.0034  0.0548  0.0547  0.0560  0.05
Czerny 1949b   27  0.8246  0.0031  0.0627  0.1353  0.0536  0.08
Ezaki 2006   40  0.8025  0.0143  0.0638  0.0654  0.0553  0.05
Falvay 1989   49  0.7753  0.0056  0.0460  0.0439  0.0849  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   52  0.7659  0.0035  0.0542  0.0546  0.0659  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   37  0.8028  0.0030  0.0626  0.1449  0.0635  0.09
Fliere 1977   3  0.876  0.044  0.193  0.5839  0.0721  0.20
Fou 1978   18  0.8349  0.0019  0.1018  0.3039  0.0727  0.14
Francois 1956   29  0.8114  0.0127  0.0632  0.117  0.5019  0.23
Hatto 1997   6  0.8736  0.0017  0.1614  0.428  0.476  0.44
Horowitz 1971   17  0.8312  0.0210  0.1411  0.446  0.534  0.48
Horowitz 1985   51  0.7634  0.0047  0.0457  0.045  0.6025  0.15
Indjic 2001   5  0.8730  0.0016  0.0913  0.438  0.475  0.45
Kapell 1951   44  0.7960  0.0052  0.0550  0.0544  0.0657  0.05
Kiepura 1999   34  0.8138  0.0045  0.0547  0.0535  0.0746  0.06
Kilenyi 1937   47  0.7832  0.0041  0.0635  0.0644  0.0750  0.06
Kissin 1993   20  0.8329  0.0015  0.0816  0.3754  0.0528  0.14
Kitain 1937   62  0.4361  0.0062  0.0639  0.0617  0.3826  0.15
Kushner 1990   10  0.855  0.053  0.135  0.558  0.443  0.49
Levy 1951   60  0.7048  0.0061  0.0455  0.0442  0.0563  0.04
Luisada 1990   19  0.8313  0.0228  0.0628  0.1341  0.0634  0.09
Lushtak 2004   7  0.8631  0.008  0.189  0.5027  0.1515  0.27
Lympany 1968   24  0.8262  0.0024  0.0723  0.1734  0.0830  0.12
Magaloff 1977   13  0.8440  0.0038  0.0541  0.0548  0.0661  0.05
Magaloff 1977b   15  0.8354  0.0039  0.0637  0.0646  0.0651  0.06
Magin 1975   41  0.7915  0.0155  0.0456  0.0442  0.0756  0.05
Milkina 1970   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Mohovich 1999   12  0.848  0.0313  0.1310  0.4825  0.2513  0.35
Nadelmann 1956   25  0.8244  0.0023  0.0722  0.1812  0.3716  0.26
Ohlsson 1999   54  0.7635  0.0058  0.0453  0.0439  0.0658  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   38  0.8042  0.0032  0.0631  0.1151  0.0543  0.07
Olejniczak 1991   31  0.8150  0.0037  0.0544  0.0540  0.0940  0.07
Osinska 1989   1  0.902  0.162  0.271  0.6520  0.277  0.42
Paderewski 1912   50  0.7657  0.0051  0.0458  0.0448  0.0564  0.04
Perahia 1994   56  0.759  0.0349  0.0546  0.057  0.5522  0.17
Perlemuter 1986   21  0.834  0.087  0.197  0.5320  0.319  0.41
Poblocka 1999   35  0.8045  0.0053  0.0636  0.0647  0.0647  0.06
Rangell 2001   36  0.8024  0.0121  0.0730  0.1244  0.0639  0.08
Risler 1920   57  0.7458  0.0050  0.0540  0.0533  0.0848  0.06
Rosen 1989   32  0.8141  0.0046  0.0454  0.0432  0.1144  0.07
Rubinstein 1939   33  0.8119  0.0120  0.0720  0.234  0.6112  0.37
Rubinstein 1952   14  0.833  0.0911  0.1615  0.3915  0.3711  0.38
Rubinstein 1966   2  0.9010  0.025  0.202  0.624  0.671  0.64
Rummel 1943   53  0.7656  0.0022  0.0625  0.1510  0.4217  0.25
Shebanova 2002   22  0.8322  0.0125  0.0719  0.2337  0.0729  0.13
Smith 1975   4  0.871  0.231  0.234  0.587  0.552  0.56
Szpilman 1948   43  0.7952  0.0036  0.0634  0.0652  0.0454  0.05
Uninsky 1971   26  0.8237  0.0014  0.1221  0.2249  0.0632  0.11
Wasowski 1980   28  0.8118  0.0133  0.0549  0.056  0.5023  0.16
Weissenberg 1971   55  0.7555  0.0048  0.0551  0.0539  0.0941  0.07
Random 1    64  -0.0864  0.0064  0.0264  0.0234  0.0665  0.03
Random 2   63  0.0865  0.0063  0.0459  0.0424  0.1737  0.08
Random 3   65  -0.1163  0.0065  0.0265  0.0210  0.3238  0.08

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).