Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	50	0.79	61	0.00	46	0.04	58	0.04	19	0.41	45	0.13
Ashkenazy 1981	30	0.86	22	0.00	25	0.06	29	0.14	11	0.41	30	0.24
Beliavsky 2004	48	0.80	19	0.01	50	0.04	54	0.04	12	0.44	43	0.13
BenOr 1989	5	0.91	10	0.02	6	0.25	6	0.59	11	0.53	5	0.56
Biret 1990	56	0.77	20	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	13	0.39	53	0.12
Blet 2003	31	0.86	56	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	26	0.18	44	0.13
Block 1995	36	0.84	33	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	17	0.39	41	0.14
Brailowsky 1960	47	0.80	51	0.00	51	0.04	61	0.04	10	0.47	40	0.14
Chiu 1999	25	0.87	9	0.02	13	0.10	23	0.25	19	0.35	22	0.30
Clidat 1994	17	0.88	3	0.15	2	0.20	7	0.58	1	0.58	2	0.58
Cohen 1997	60	0.62	32	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	14	0.39	51	0.12
Coop 1987	4	0.91	7	0.04	7	0.24	4	0.64	13	0.47	6	0.55
Cortot 1951	35	0.85	12	0.01	38	0.08	37	0.08	1	0.72	31	0.24
Czerny 1949	46	0.80	54	0.00	26	0.05	28	0.14	41	0.06	60	0.09
Czerny 1949b	33	0.85	42	0.00	18	0.10	22	0.30	30	0.25	24	0.27
Ezaki 2006	1	0.92	4	0.10	5	0.26	2	0.68	15	0.46	4	0.56
Falvay 1989	11	0.89	23	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.38	20	0.37	18	0.37
Ferenczy 1958	44	0.82	49	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.13	7	0.54	26	0.26
Fiorentino 1962	14	0.88	59	0.00	20	0.09	15	0.39	17	0.39	17	0.39
Fliere 1977	7	0.90	25	0.00	8	0.25	8	0.53	16	0.36	12	0.44
Fou 1978	3	0.91	5	0.09	4	0.18	5	0.61	5	0.61	1	0.61
Francois 1956	42	0.82	26	0.00	44	0.04	56	0.04	10	0.45	47	0.13
Hatto 1997	49	0.79	45	0.00	41	0.04	53	0.04	14	0.36	48	0.12
Horowitz 1971	43	0.82	55	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	17	0.37	42	0.14
Horowitz 1985	59	0.64	40	0.00	61	0.04	52	0.04	32	0.10	61	0.06
Indjic 2001	51	0.79	43	0.00	47	0.05	45	0.05	16	0.35	46	0.13
Kapell 1951	10	0.90	18	0.01	10	0.14	10	0.48	17	0.43	11	0.45
Kiepura 1999	32	0.85	27	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.06	20	0.39	36	0.15
Kilenyi 1937	19	0.88	62	0.00	22	0.07	21	0.34	27	0.28	21	0.31
Kissin 1993	2	0.92	1	0.20	1	0.20	3	0.66	10	0.41	7	0.52
Kitain 1937	62	0.46	39	0.00	62	0.06	43	0.06	25	0.25	52	0.12
Kushner 1990	26	0.86	6	0.06	9	0.18	11	0.46	6	0.49	10	0.47
Levy 1951	55	0.77	52	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	7	0.54	38	0.15
Luisada 1990	23	0.87	48	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	29	0.21	55	0.11
Lushtak 2004	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Lympany 1968	18	0.88	17	0.01	14	0.10	13	0.43	3	0.60	8	0.51
Magaloff 1977	21	0.88	16	0.01	33	0.11	33	0.11	18	0.31	33	0.18
Magaloff 1977b	20	0.88	28	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	18	0.26	34	0.18
Magin 1975	16	0.88	14	0.01	24	0.07	26	0.17	28	0.36	27	0.25
Milkina 1970	29	0.86	35	0.00	30	0.06	27	0.15	9	0.50	25	0.27
Mohovich 1999	40	0.83	41	0.00	39	0.09	35	0.09	29	0.12	57	0.10
Nadelmann 1956	54	0.78	53	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	38	0.06	63	0.05
Ohlsson 1999	38	0.83	50	0.00	53	0.05	48	0.05	29	0.15	59	0.09
Olejniczac 1990	15	0.88	46	0.00	21	0.11	16	0.38	17	0.36	19	0.37
Olejniczak 1991	12	0.89	65	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.39	16	0.41	16	0.40
Osinska 1989	6	0.91	2	0.17	3	0.23	1	0.70	7	0.47	3	0.57
Paderewski 1912	45	0.81	31	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	23	0.28	49	0.12
Perahia 1994	61	0.61	15	0.01	43	0.05	50	0.05	28	0.21	56	0.10
Perlemuter 1986	41	0.82	34	0.00	11	0.16	20	0.34	21	0.31	20	0.32
Poblocka 1999	9	0.90	38	0.00	17	0.11	12	0.43	19	0.41	14	0.42
Rangell 2001	13	0.89	24	0.00	23	0.12	19	0.36	15	0.46	15	0.41
Risler 1920	53	0.78	57	0.00	57	0.05	46	0.05	32	0.15	58	0.09
Rosen 1989	24	0.87	29	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.13	7	0.48	28	0.25
Rubinstein 1939	58	0.68	30	0.00	59	0.06	42	0.06	24	0.20	54	0.11
Rubinstein 1952	34	0.85	36	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.08	9	0.44	32	0.19
Rubinstein 1966	52	0.79	21	0.00	54	0.06	44	0.06	10	0.43	35	0.16
Rummel 1943	57	0.72	47	0.00	58	0.06	39	0.06	19	0.25	50	0.12
Shebanova 2002	8	0.90	13	0.01	12	0.14	9	0.50	7	0.51	9	0.50
Smith 1975	28	0.86	44	0.00	28	0.06	24	0.19	14	0.42	23	0.28
Szpilman 1948	37	0.84	63	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.17	19	0.33	29	0.24
Uninsky 1971	22	0.87	11	0.01	15	0.09	17	0.38	5	0.52	13	0.44
Wasowski 1980	39	0.83	8	0.02	42	0.04	55	0.04	3	0.56	37	0.15
Weissenberg 1971	27	0.86	37	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	22	0.27	39	0.15
Random 1	64	-0.07	64	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	29	0.11	62	0.06
Random 2	63	0.07	60	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	34	0.05	64	0.04
Random 3	65	-0.20	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	63	0.02	65	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).