Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   6  0.841  0.191  0.185  0.565  0.572  0.56
Ashkenazy 1981   16  0.8235  0.0028  0.0823  0.2444  0.0631  0.12
Beliavsky 2004   51  0.7427  0.0035  0.0933  0.0927  0.2027  0.13
BenOr 1989   21  0.8115  0.0125  0.0821  0.2951  0.0532  0.12
Biret 1990   1  0.878  0.067  0.147  0.523  0.593  0.55
Blet 2003   5  0.853  0.125  0.244  0.5616  0.259  0.37
Block 1995   53  0.7440  0.0060  0.0554  0.0548  0.0656  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   31  0.7841  0.0050  0.0639  0.0632  0.1238  0.08
Chiu 1999   54  0.7337  0.0054  0.0641  0.0642  0.0741  0.06
Clidat 1994   11  0.8331  0.0015  0.0712  0.4354  0.0520  0.15
Cohen 1997   61  0.6726  0.0043  0.0460  0.045  0.5822  0.15
Coop 1987   38  0.7754  0.0046  0.0638  0.0648  0.0643  0.06
Cortot 1951   37  0.7757  0.0058  0.0644  0.0636  0.0647  0.06
Czerny 1949   55  0.7245  0.0031  0.0632  0.1352  0.0539  0.08
Czerny 1949b   44  0.7642  0.0024  0.0824  0.2354  0.0533  0.11
Ezaki 2006   27  0.7939  0.0041  0.0545  0.0558  0.0548  0.05
Falvay 1989   56  0.7244  0.0059  0.0552  0.0544  0.0742  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   49  0.7448  0.0051  0.0456  0.0436  0.0845  0.06
Fiorentino 1962   32  0.7859  0.0044  0.0553  0.0551  0.0557  0.05
Fliere 1977   9  0.8321  0.0011  0.1210  0.4541  0.0618  0.16
Fou 1978   34  0.7828  0.0032  0.0731  0.1445  0.0635  0.09
Francois 1956   48  0.7417  0.0126  0.0928  0.1823  0.2414  0.21
Hatto 1997   42  0.7655  0.0034  0.0834  0.0855  0.0444  0.06
Horowitz 1971   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Horowitz 1985   12  0.834  0.119  0.1411  0.431  0.821  0.59
Indjic 2001   43  0.7652  0.0033  0.0735  0.0750  0.0546  0.06
Kapell 1951   36  0.7738  0.0040  0.0547  0.0559  0.0461  0.04
Kiepura 1999   41  0.7651  0.0055  0.0458  0.0447  0.0558  0.04
Kilenyi 1937   26  0.7918  0.0021  0.0819  0.3548  0.0624  0.14
Kissin 1993   10  0.8332  0.0010  0.138  0.4944  0.0617  0.17
Kitain 1937   62  0.5333  0.0039  0.0555  0.051  0.6316  0.18
Kushner 1990   3  0.869  0.042  0.151  0.5811  0.376  0.46
Levy 1951   58  0.7063  0.0061  0.0459  0.0458  0.0364  0.03
Luisada 1990   13  0.8214  0.0114  0.0714  0.3945  0.0621  0.15
Lushtak 2004   18  0.8253  0.0019  0.1117  0.3747  0.0525  0.14
Lympany 1968   2  0.866  0.084  0.223  0.578  0.474  0.52
Magaloff 1977   14  0.8260  0.0029  0.0925  0.2150  0.0634  0.11
Magaloff 1977b   15  0.8249  0.0030  0.0729  0.1855  0.0537  0.09
Magin 1975   47  0.7462  0.0056  0.0463  0.0443  0.0753  0.05
Milkina 1970   7  0.8311  0.026  0.156  0.5311  0.445  0.48
Mohovich 1999   20  0.8119  0.0017  0.1018  0.3737  0.0719  0.16
Nadelmann 1956   22  0.817  0.0612  0.0920  0.3210  0.3911  0.35
Ohlsson 1999   45  0.7516  0.0152  0.0549  0.0545  0.0554  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   30  0.7947  0.0042  0.0550  0.0548  0.0655  0.05
Olejniczak 1991   28  0.7950  0.0045  0.0640  0.0650  0.0552  0.05
Osinska 1989   4  0.862  0.123  0.202  0.5836  0.0913  0.23
Paderewski 1912   25  0.8012  0.0118  0.1215  0.3813  0.3710  0.37
Perahia 1994   60  0.6820  0.0036  0.0636  0.0616  0.3126  0.14
Perlemuter 1986   35  0.7723  0.0023  0.0726  0.2134  0.0729  0.12
Poblocka 1999   33  0.7843  0.0048  0.0551  0.0554  0.0550  0.05
Rangell 2001   50  0.7430  0.0053  0.0457  0.0453  0.0563  0.04
Risler 1920   57  0.7061  0.0062  0.0643  0.0655  0.0551  0.05
Rosen 1989   19  0.8225  0.0027  0.0822  0.2828  0.1515  0.20
Rubinstein 1939   39  0.7710  0.0213  0.0827  0.208  0.5012  0.32
Rubinstein 1952   8  0.835  0.088  0.149  0.4719  0.348  0.40
Rubinstein 1966   23  0.8129  0.0022  0.1013  0.4212  0.397  0.40
Rummel 1943   59  0.6913  0.0138  0.0642  0.0618  0.2530  0.12
Shebanova 2002   29  0.7924  0.0047  0.0546  0.0560  0.0462  0.04
Smith 1975   17  0.8222  0.0016  0.0916  0.3841  0.0523  0.14
Szpilman 1948   24  0.8058  0.0037  0.0637  0.0649  0.0549  0.05
Uninsky 1971   40  0.7634  0.0020  0.0830  0.1654  0.0536  0.09
Wasowski 1980   46  0.7536  0.0049  0.0548  0.0520  0.2728  0.12
Weissenberg 1971   52  0.7446  0.0057  0.0461  0.0453  0.0559  0.04
Random 1    64  -0.0965  0.0064  0.0264  0.0232  0.1060  0.04
Random 2   63  0.1056  0.0063  0.0462  0.0426  0.1440  0.07
Random 3   65  -0.1364  0.0065  0.0265  0.0258  0.0265  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).