Wasowski 1980

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   48  0.6038  0.0039  0.0643  0.0645  0.0649  0.06
Ashkenazy 1981   15  0.6821  0.0012  0.1112  0.4742  0.0716  0.18
Beliavsky 2004   39  0.6237  0.0048  0.0549  0.0531  0.1337  0.08
BenOr 1989   5  0.7034  0.006  0.216  0.5839  0.0813  0.22
Biret 1990   52  0.5952  0.0043  0.0647  0.0640  0.0652  0.06
Blet 2003   55  0.5744  0.0054  0.0462  0.0456  0.0461  0.04
Block 1995   53  0.5920  0.0044  0.0645  0.0661  0.0457  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   57  0.5647  0.0058  0.0552  0.0543  0.0844  0.06
Chiu 1999   35  0.6310  0.0216  0.1217  0.3951  0.0521  0.14
Clidat 1994   41  0.6249  0.0046  0.0837  0.0847  0.0640  0.07
Cohen 1997   61  0.4564  0.0062  0.0644  0.0627  0.2429  0.12
Coop 1987   36  0.6345  0.0040  0.0548  0.0546  0.0656  0.05
Cortot 1951   56  0.5627  0.0060  0.0461  0.0427  0.2832  0.11
Czerny 1949   13  0.6814  0.0111  0.1111  0.4840  0.0620  0.17
Czerny 1949b   11  0.6913  0.0113  0.1113  0.4746  0.0618  0.17
Ezaki 2006   3  0.722  0.133  0.222  0.7530  0.172  0.36
Falvay 1989   46  0.6060  0.0056  0.0646  0.0648  0.0645  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   60  0.5159  0.0055  0.0456  0.0455  0.0562  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   28  0.6456  0.0036  0.0836  0.0853  0.0641  0.07
Fliere 1977   10  0.6912  0.017  0.118  0.5240  0.0814  0.20
Fou 1978   1  0.741  0.341  0.341  0.7922  0.291  0.48
Francois 1956   30  0.6417  0.0147  0.0740  0.0743  0.0553  0.06
Hatto 1997   27  0.6440  0.0021  0.1021  0.2843  0.0722  0.14
Horowitz 1971   23  0.6525  0.0019  0.1116  0.4026  0.323  0.36
Horowitz 1985   54  0.5757  0.0049  0.0457  0.0427  0.3425  0.12
Indjic 2001   31  0.6442  0.0024  0.0824  0.2441  0.0724  0.13
Kapell 1951   37  0.6218  0.0141  0.0551  0.0558  0.0460  0.04
Kiepura 1999   17  0.6750  0.0035  0.0739  0.0754  0.0543  0.06
Kilenyi 1937   29  0.6441  0.0027  0.0826  0.2140  0.0728  0.12
Kissin 1993   26  0.6516  0.0122  0.1023  0.2547  0.0627  0.12
Kitain 1937   62  0.4028  0.0061  0.0460  0.0437  0.0758  0.05
Kushner 1990   8  0.694  0.072  0.193  0.7229  0.155  0.33
Levy 1951   45  0.6139  0.0032  0.0927  0.1824  0.3311  0.24
Luisada 1990   20  0.668  0.0225  0.0732  0.1244  0.0638  0.08
Lushtak 2004   9  0.696  0.059  0.1110  0.5031  0.187  0.30
Lympany 1968   50  0.6063  0.0052  0.0550  0.0552  0.0554  0.05
Magaloff 1977   18  0.6619  0.0029  0.0729  0.1747  0.0731  0.11
Magaloff 1977b   21  0.6646  0.0030  0.0731  0.1541  0.0635  0.09
Magin 1975   7  0.707  0.0414  0.1315  0.4345  0.0717  0.17
Milkina 1970   14  0.6823  0.0017  0.1014  0.4645  0.0619  0.17
Mohovich 1999   49  0.6058  0.0050  0.0458  0.0456  0.0564  0.04
Nadelmann 1956   32  0.6436  0.0037  0.0934  0.0954  0.0447  0.06
Ohlsson 1999   42  0.6161  0.0042  0.0642  0.0649  0.0646  0.06
Olejniczac 1990   25  0.6543  0.0034  0.0838  0.0855  0.0548  0.06
Olejniczak 1991   22  0.6551  0.0028  0.0725  0.2248  0.0726  0.12
Osinska 1989   2  0.7311  0.015  0.325  0.7046  0.0712  0.22
Paderewski 1912   38  0.6226  0.0045  0.0741  0.0751  0.0550  0.06
Perahia 1994   44  0.619  0.0223  0.0930  0.1619  0.438  0.26
Perlemuter 1986   34  0.6333  0.0026  0.0722  0.2555  0.0530  0.11
Poblocka 1999   6  0.7024  0.008  0.127  0.5445  0.0615  0.18
Rangell 2001   16  0.6730  0.0015  0.0919  0.3752  0.0523  0.14
Risler 1920   59  0.5253  0.0059  0.0459  0.0453  0.0655  0.05
Rosen 1989   47  0.6035  0.0051  0.0553  0.0546  0.0751  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   40  0.625  0.0610  0.1120  0.3119  0.374  0.34
Rubinstein 1952   33  0.6331  0.0033  0.0935  0.0935  0.0642  0.07
Rubinstein 1966   19  0.6622  0.0018  0.139  0.5032  0.1310  0.25
Rummel 1943   51  0.5954  0.0053  0.0554  0.0554  0.0463  0.04
Shebanova 2002   4  0.713  0.134  0.304  0.7130  0.136  0.30
Smith 1975   24  0.6529  0.0031  0.0828  0.1738  0.0633  0.10
Szpilman 1948   43  0.6132  0.0038  0.0933  0.0949  0.0639  0.07
Uninsky 1971   12  0.6915  0.0120  0.1318  0.3831  0.169  0.25
Wasowski 1980   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Weissenberg 1971   58  0.5648  0.0057  0.0555  0.0561  0.0359  0.04
Random 1    64  -0.0555  0.0064  0.0264  0.0213  0.3436  0.08
Random 2   63  0.0265  0.0063  0.0363  0.0323  0.2534  0.09
Random 3   65  -0.0662  0.0065  0.0265  0.0240  0.0565  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).