Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		43	0.69	40	0.00	42	0.08	35	0.08	10	0.52	33	0.20
Ashkenazy 1981		23	0.73	48	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.19	16	0.36	29	0.26
Beliavsky 2004		49	0.66	45	0.00	54	0.07	39	0.07	14	0.41	39	0.17
BenOr 1989		5	0.81	4	0.04	4	0.26	3	0.76	7	0.63	4	0.69
Biret 1990		50	0.66	57	0.00	44	0.05	55	0.05	13	0.44	47	0.15
Blet 2003		46	0.68	47	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	24	0.23	53	0.11
Block 1995		27	0.72	49	0.00	27	0.05	32	0.12	15	0.50	30	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.59	55	0.00	57	0.06	42	0.06	29	0.20	52	0.11
Chiu 1999		10	0.78	22	0.00	10	0.18	13	0.54	8	0.55	13	0.54
Clidat 1994		32	0.71	36	0.00	34	0.06	48	0.06	26	0.20	54	0.11
Cohen 1997		59	0.54	39	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	10	0.57	41	0.17
Coop 1987		6	0.81	21	0.00	6	0.27	6	0.65	13	0.54	9	0.59
Cortot 1951		58	0.58	37	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	29	0.27	56	0.10
Czerny 1949		30	0.71	35	0.00	14	0.14	18	0.37	11	0.50	19	0.43
Czerny 1949b		16	0.75	10	0.01	15	0.23	14	0.54	7	0.65	8	0.59
Ezaki 2006		1	0.84	1	0.62	1	0.61	1	0.83	4	0.73	1	0.78
Falvay 1989		8	0.79	32	0.00	11	0.24	9	0.56	14	0.54	12	0.55
Ferenczy 1958		37	0.70	30	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	3	0.75	35	0.19
Fiorentino 1962		26	0.72	54	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.18	18	0.50	27	0.30
Fliere 1977		11	0.78	7	0.01	9	0.14	12	0.55	7	0.61	10	0.58
Fou 1978		9	0.79	13	0.01	8	0.18	7	0.60	12	0.61	7	0.60
Francois 1956		52	0.65	31	0.00	56	0.11	33	0.11	25	0.22	44	0.16
Hatto 1997		39	0.70	34	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	11	0.47	45	0.15
Horowitz 1971		48	0.67	11	0.01	53	0.06	44	0.06	19	0.41	43	0.16
Horowitz 1985		60	0.51	43	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	31	0.19	55	0.10
Indjic 2001		42	0.69	23	0.00	47	0.05	56	0.05	11	0.47	46	0.15
Kapell 1951		15	0.75	62	0.00	19	0.14	20	0.31	24	0.36	23	0.33
Kiepura 1999		17	0.75	18	0.00	20	0.13	19	0.34	2	0.66	17	0.47
Kilenyi 1937		13	0.77	41	0.00	12	0.28	15	0.53	15	0.56	14	0.54
Kissin 1993		2	0.83	3	0.06	2	0.25	4	0.76	6	0.59	5	0.67
Kitain 1937		62	0.36	38	0.00	62	0.06	47	0.06	56	0.04	62	0.05
Kushner 1990		19	0.74	6	0.01	16	0.12	11	0.55	14	0.51	15	0.53
Levy 1951		53	0.64	50	0.00	55	0.09	34	0.09	14	0.47	32	0.21
Luisada 1990		35	0.70	44	0.00	49	0.06	41	0.06	20	0.33	50	0.14
Lushtak 2004		12	0.78	14	0.01	13	0.13	10	0.55	4	0.70	6	0.62
Lympany 1968		29	0.72	28	0.00	43	0.07	37	0.07	9	0.50	34	0.19
Magaloff 1977		21	0.74	59	0.00	23	0.10	23	0.23	6	0.53	22	0.35
Magaloff 1977b		24	0.73	52	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.18	8	0.52	25	0.31
Magin 1975		7	0.80	19	0.00	7	0.16	8	0.60	19	0.52	11	0.56
Milkina 1970		22	0.73	25	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.07	20	0.47	36	0.18
Mohovich 1999		40	0.69	15	0.01	24	0.09	25	0.18	8	0.62	24	0.33
Nadelmann 1956		47	0.67	17	0.00	37	0.05	58	0.05	26	0.18	57	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		14	0.76	26	0.00	18	0.15	17	0.41	9	0.58	16	0.49
Olejniczac 1990		28	0.72	58	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.12	19	0.43	31	0.23
Olejniczak 1991		25	0.73	56	0.00	22	0.12	21	0.30	17	0.40	21	0.35
Osinska 1989		4	0.81	2	0.10	3	0.20	2	0.82	9	0.60	3	0.70
Paderewski 1912		54	0.63	63	0.00	46	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.06	61	0.05
Perahia 1994		57	0.59	5	0.02	39	0.06	43	0.06	11	0.56	38	0.18
Perlemuter 1986		45	0.69	20	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.14	32	0.13	51	0.13
Poblocka 1999		3	0.82	9	0.01	5	0.33	5	0.73	3	0.71	2	0.72
Rangell 2001		18	0.74	51	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.29	15	0.48	20	0.37
Risler 1920		51	0.65	33	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	27	0.35	48	0.14
Rosen 1989		41	0.69	24	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	14	0.50	42	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.62	16	0.01	38	0.05	52	0.05	18	0.37	49	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.70	29	0.00	40	0.05	50	0.05	31	0.16	58	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.70	27	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	10	0.45	37	0.18
Rummel 1943		61	0.49	65	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.04	63	0.04
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		44	0.69	60	0.00	36	0.06	45	0.06	34	0.08	59	0.07
Szpilman 1948		38	0.70	12	0.01	29	0.05	28	0.15	20	0.50	28	0.27
Uninsky 1971		31	0.71	46	0.00	33	0.07	40	0.07	14	0.41	40	0.17
Wasowski 1980		33	0.71	8	0.01	32	0.07	30	0.13	4	0.71	26	0.30
Weissenberg 1971		20	0.74	42	0.00	17	0.14	16	0.45	13	0.50	18	0.47
Random 1		64	-0.03	64	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	38	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		63	0.04	61	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	29	0.16	60	0.07
Random 3		65	-0.04	53	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	42	0.04	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).