Rummel 1943

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   57  0.4911  0.0132  0.0432  0.0858  0.0436  0.06
Ashkenazy 1981   22  0.6052  0.0030  0.0629  0.1244  0.0728  0.09
Beliavsky 2004   54  0.5051  0.0058  0.0359  0.0362  0.0463  0.03
BenOr 1989   28  0.5839  0.0039  0.0734  0.0742  0.0733  0.07
Biret 1990   47  0.5343  0.0035  0.0448  0.0457  0.0462  0.04
Blet 2003   37  0.574  0.094  0.179  0.3636  0.0612  0.15
Block 1995   59  0.4930  0.0041  0.0636  0.0642  0.0637  0.06
Brailowsky 1960   14  0.6320  0.0121  0.0722  0.2217  0.452  0.31
Chiu 1999   58  0.4936  0.0046  0.0450  0.0456  0.0455  0.04
Clidat 1994   8  0.652  0.182  0.233  0.5355  0.059  0.16
Cohen 1997   62  0.3354  0.0062  0.0640  0.0641  0.0638  0.06
Coop 1987   33  0.5723  0.0014  0.0821  0.2560  0.0426  0.10
Cortot 1951   51  0.5137  0.0061  0.0638  0.0640  0.0739  0.06
Czerny 1949   1  0.703  0.143  0.192  0.6148  0.065  0.19
Czerny 1949b   3  0.6726  0.0011  0.124  0.4951  0.058  0.16
Ezaki 2006   36  0.5747  0.0040  0.0546  0.0551  0.0640  0.05
Falvay 1989   48  0.5322  0.0034  0.0547  0.0560  0.0456  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   61  0.3960  0.0057  0.0358  0.0350  0.0558  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   25  0.5941  0.0045  0.0545  0.0557  0.0551  0.05
Fliere 1977   13  0.6325  0.0022  0.0916  0.2843  0.0713  0.14
Fou 1978   11  0.635  0.057  0.136  0.4447  0.076  0.18
Francois 1956   9  0.6533  0.0023  0.0923  0.1738  0.0627  0.10
Hatto 1997   53  0.5064  0.0049  0.0456  0.0458  0.0557  0.04
Horowitz 1971   18  0.6113  0.019  0.098  0.4231  0.193  0.28
Horowitz 1985   46  0.5358  0.0060  0.0639  0.0640  0.0634  0.06
Indjic 2001   55  0.5065  0.0050  0.0542  0.0552  0.0649  0.05
Kapell 1951   41  0.5635  0.0027  0.0526  0.1456  0.0530  0.08
Kiepura 1999   34  0.5718  0.0159  0.0451  0.0456  0.0552  0.04
Kilenyi 1937   19  0.6124  0.0020  0.0718  0.2754  0.0619  0.13
Kissin 1993   31  0.588  0.0413  0.1514  0.3156  0.0521  0.12
Kitain 1937   60  0.4610  0.0154  0.0362  0.0319  0.4423  0.11
Kushner 1990   15  0.6242  0.008  0.1210  0.3644  0.0611  0.15
Levy 1951   40  0.5616  0.0119  0.0920  0.2530  0.184  0.21
Luisada 1990   5  0.669  0.0216  0.0913  0.3258  0.0520  0.13
Lushtak 2004   32  0.5856  0.0033  0.0544  0.0545  0.0647  0.05
Lympany 1968   35  0.5761  0.0037  0.0635  0.0653  0.0541  0.05
Magaloff 1977   39  0.5746  0.0047  0.0543  0.0558  0.0545  0.05
Magaloff 1977b   44  0.5638  0.0048  0.0453  0.0451  0.0650  0.05
Magin 1975   20  0.607  0.0425  0.0628  0.1447  0.0725  0.10
Milkina 1970   21  0.6032  0.0012  0.1115  0.2851  0.0617  0.13
Mohovich 1999   43  0.5648  0.0056  0.0360  0.0352  0.0561  0.04
Nadelmann 1956   2  0.691  0.231  0.231  0.6218  0.281  0.42
Ohlsson 1999   49  0.5215  0.0138  0.0733  0.0763  0.0444  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   23  0.6034  0.0042  0.0637  0.0659  0.0446  0.05
Olejniczak 1991   27  0.5850  0.0044  0.0452  0.0450  0.0642  0.05
Osinska 1989   7  0.6662  0.0010  0.1011  0.3656  0.0516  0.13
Paderewski 1912   12  0.6329  0.0018  0.0919  0.2650  0.0522  0.11
Perahia 1994   45  0.5545  0.0052  0.0457  0.0435  0.0748  0.05
Perlemuter 1986   4  0.6627  0.0015  0.0712  0.3450  0.0614  0.14
Poblocka 1999   17  0.6214  0.0129  0.0827  0.1456  0.0529  0.08
Rangell 2001   38  0.5763  0.0028  0.0630  0.1253  0.0532  0.08
Risler 1920   26  0.5917  0.0126  0.0524  0.1654  0.0624  0.10
Rosen 1989   52  0.5159  0.0053  0.0361  0.0353  0.0560  0.04
Rubinstein 1939   30  0.5840  0.0024  0.0625  0.1529  0.177  0.16
Rubinstein 1952   10  0.6419  0.016  0.145  0.4658  0.0415  0.14
Rubinstein 1966   42  0.5649  0.0031  0.0531  0.0961  0.0435  0.06
Rummel 1943   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Shebanova 2002   56  0.4953  0.0055  0.0455  0.0449  0.0559  0.04
Smith 1975   6  0.666  0.045  0.147  0.4343  0.0510  0.15
Szpilman 1948   29  0.5844  0.0043  0.0449  0.0456  0.0554  0.04
Uninsky 1971   16  0.6212  0.0117  0.0817  0.2845  0.0618  0.13
Wasowski 1980   24  0.5931  0.0051  0.0454  0.0454  0.0553  0.04
Weissenberg 1971   50  0.5121  0.0036  0.0541  0.0551  0.0643  0.05
Random 1    65  -0.0828  0.0065  0.0265  0.0265  0.0264  0.02
Random 2   63  -0.0455  0.0063  0.0263  0.0258  0.0365  0.02
Random 3   64  -0.0557  0.0064  0.0264  0.0214  0.3531  0.08

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).