Levy 1951

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   46  0.5718  0.0138  0.0460  0.0456  0.0462  0.04
Ashkenazy 1981   45  0.5763  0.0033  0.0734  0.0755  0.0644  0.06
Beliavsky 2004   59  0.4923  0.0060  0.0643  0.0657  0.0550  0.05
BenOr 1989   4  0.678  0.025  0.144  0.6950  0.0611  0.20
Biret 1990   48  0.5640  0.0039  0.0462  0.0446  0.0564  0.04
Blet 2003   53  0.5464  0.0055  0.0554  0.0547  0.0553  0.05
Block 1995   42  0.5848  0.0048  0.0550  0.0543  0.0656  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   43  0.5734  0.0040  0.0558  0.0522  0.3926  0.14
Chiu 1999   31  0.5937  0.0036  0.0735  0.0745  0.0639  0.06
Clidat 1994   10  0.6546  0.0014  0.1516  0.4561  0.0523  0.15
Cohen 1997   62  0.3755  0.0062  0.0546  0.0556  0.0463  0.04
Coop 1987   8  0.659  0.0211  0.179  0.5836  0.0710  0.20
Cortot 1951   60  0.4759  0.0061  0.0640  0.0637  0.0838  0.07
Czerny 1949   16  0.6328  0.0010  0.188  0.5946  0.0615  0.19
Czerny 1949b   22  0.6311  0.0112  0.1311  0.5238  0.0714  0.19
Ezaki 2006   6  0.6714  0.016  0.143  0.6941  0.076  0.22
Falvay 1989   14  0.644  0.088  0.166  0.6249  0.0613  0.19
Ferenczy 1958   51  0.5552  0.0044  0.0644  0.0639  0.0742  0.06
Fiorentino 1962   33  0.5949  0.0047  0.0641  0.0642  0.0745  0.06
Fliere 1977   7  0.6633  0.0013  0.1212  0.5249  0.0712  0.19
Fou 1978   1  0.701  0.271  0.261  0.7727  0.241  0.43
Francois 1956   58  0.5116  0.0152  0.0552  0.0544  0.0560  0.05
Hatto 1997   56  0.5260  0.0057  0.0639  0.0638  0.0741  0.06
Horowitz 1971   49  0.5651  0.0053  0.0642  0.0649  0.0646  0.06
Horowitz 1985   54  0.5339  0.0056  0.0555  0.0529  0.2131  0.10
Indjic 2001   57  0.5156  0.0058  0.0548  0.0558  0.0557  0.05
Kapell 1951   2  0.6810  0.023  0.215  0.6336  0.094  0.24
Kiepura 1999   50  0.5545  0.0054  0.0645  0.0660  0.0447  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   15  0.6426  0.0019  0.1313  0.4748  0.0618  0.17
Kissin 1993   20  0.6365  0.0028  0.0925  0.2654  0.0530  0.11
Kitain 1937   61  0.4229  0.0059  0.0461  0.0428  0.2235  0.09
Kushner 1990   9  0.6525  0.0015  0.1220  0.4056  0.0428  0.13
Levy 1951   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Luisada 1990   39  0.5850  0.0045  0.0553  0.0548  0.0655  0.05
Lushtak 2004   21  0.6330  0.0020  0.0921  0.3943  0.0624  0.15
Lympany 1968   24  0.6215  0.0121  0.0918  0.4240  0.0816  0.18
Magaloff 1977   35  0.5947  0.0050  0.0559  0.0559  0.0554  0.05
Magaloff 1977b   37  0.5843  0.0051  0.0637  0.0656  0.0558  0.05
Magin 1975   27  0.6122  0.0018  0.0919  0.4048  0.0620  0.15
Milkina 1970   34  0.5927  0.0034  0.0638  0.0656  0.0549  0.05
Mohovich 1999   41  0.5858  0.0041  0.0556  0.0557  0.0559  0.05
Nadelmann 1956   19  0.633  0.114  0.1317  0.4351  0.0522  0.15
Ohlsson 1999   36  0.5941  0.0043  0.0549  0.0558  0.0551  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   32  0.5944  0.0046  0.0557  0.0561  0.0461  0.04
Olejniczak 1991   17  0.6361  0.0029  0.0927  0.2451  0.0629  0.12
Osinska 1989   3  0.682  0.262  0.342  0.7047  0.077  0.22
Paderewski 1912   30  0.5938  0.0035  0.0833  0.0853  0.0543  0.06
Perahia 1994   55  0.527  0.0222  0.1128  0.2327  0.245  0.23
Perlemuter 1986   40  0.5831  0.0042  0.0551  0.0546  0.0652  0.05
Poblocka 1999   5  0.6719  0.017  0.177  0.6132  0.122  0.27
Rangell 2001   25  0.6257  0.0024  0.1223  0.3643  0.0625  0.15
Risler 1920   26  0.6132  0.0032  0.0931  0.1734  0.1027  0.13
Rosen 1989   38  0.5836  0.0049  0.0547  0.0534  0.0937  0.07
Rubinstein 1939   52  0.5524  0.0037  0.0636  0.0651  0.0548  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   18  0.635  0.0330  0.0826  0.2455  0.0434  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   28  0.616  0.0231  0.0929  0.1952  0.0532  0.10
Rummel 1943   47  0.5642  0.0027  0.0730  0.1820  0.259  0.21
Shebanova 2002   12  0.6413  0.0117  0.0914  0.4734  0.098  0.21
Smith 1975   11  0.6412  0.019  0.1510  0.5244  0.0519  0.16
Szpilman 1948   23  0.6335  0.0016  0.1415  0.4651  0.0617  0.17
Uninsky 1971   44  0.5721  0.0126  0.0732  0.1247  0.0536  0.08
Wasowski 1980   29  0.6120  0.0125  0.0924  0.3327  0.183  0.24
Weissenberg 1971   13  0.6417  0.0123  0.1122  0.3747  0.0621  0.15
Random 1    65  -0.0553  0.0065  0.0265  0.0229  0.1640  0.06
Random 2   64  0.0062  0.0064  0.0263  0.0260  0.0265  0.02
Random 3   63  0.0054  0.0063  0.0264  0.024  0.5533  0.10

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).