Kissin 1993

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   23  0.7511  0.0219  0.1216  0.472  0.7314  0.59
Ashkenazy 1981   16  0.799  0.0223  0.1520  0.412  0.7516  0.55
Beliavsky 2004   39  0.7219  0.0132  0.1030  0.191  0.7327  0.37
BenOr 1989   25  0.7552  0.0036  0.0549  0.0526  0.1960  0.10
Biret 1990   47  0.6934  0.0049  0.1035  0.105  0.6434  0.25
Blet 2003   41  0.7257  0.0048  0.0741  0.0717  0.4046  0.17
Block 1995   30  0.7541  0.0044  0.0742  0.076  0.5939  0.20
Brailowsky 1960   60  0.5345  0.0062  0.0646  0.0654  0.0662  0.06
Chiu 1999   2  0.843  0.063  0.238  0.571  0.668  0.61
Clidat 1994   20  0.7718  0.0118  0.1313  0.503  0.6415  0.57
Cohen 1997   61  0.5350  0.0061  0.0459  0.0413  0.5551  0.15
Coop 1987   1  0.871  0.371  0.372  0.698  0.645  0.66
Cortot 1951   50  0.6742  0.0052  0.0558  0.051  0.8140  0.20
Czerny 1949   34  0.742  0.162  0.2811  0.546  0.6712  0.60
Czerny 1949b   19  0.788  0.034  0.233  0.652  0.791  0.72
Ezaki 2006   3  0.8412  0.027  0.154  0.647  0.684  0.66
Falvay 1989   5  0.8358  0.0012  0.1115  0.4913  0.5518  0.52
Ferenczy 1958   56  0.6262  0.0060  0.0551  0.0528  0.2358  0.11
Fiorentino 1962   24  0.7563  0.0042  0.0548  0.0516  0.5349  0.16
Fliere 1977   15  0.805  0.049  0.0910  0.543  0.687  0.61
Fou 1978   14  0.807  0.0322  0.1519  0.428  0.6320  0.51
Francois 1956   52  0.6625  0.0051  0.0740  0.0713  0.4444  0.18
Hatto 1997   42  0.7243  0.0029  0.0729  0.193  0.6430  0.35
Horowitz 1971   49  0.6840  0.0050  0.0937  0.093  0.5936  0.23
Horowitz 1985   59  0.5448  0.0059  0.0460  0.0417  0.4254  0.13
Indjic 2001   43  0.7247  0.0030  0.0831  0.195  0.6431  0.35
Kapell 1951   10  0.8155  0.0021  0.1618  0.4411  0.6021  0.51
Kiepura 1999   35  0.7438  0.0047  0.1133  0.118  0.5933  0.25
Kilenyi 1937   12  0.8036  0.0010  0.119  0.557  0.6810  0.61
Kissin 1993   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Kitain 1937   62  0.4030  0.0057  0.0363  0.0320  0.4259  0.11
Kushner 1990   28  0.7535  0.0015  0.0926  0.2715  0.4828  0.36
Levy 1951   55  0.6361  0.0054  0.0554  0.0525  0.2657  0.11
Luisada 1990   31  0.7537  0.0038  0.0552  0.057  0.5947  0.17
Lushtak 2004   9  0.8220  0.016  0.145  0.601  0.802  0.69
Lympany 1968   37  0.7332  0.0045  0.0738  0.076  0.5937  0.20
Magaloff 1977   21  0.7733  0.0025  0.0923  0.293  0.6024  0.42
Magaloff 1977b   18  0.7824  0.0024  0.1022  0.323  0.6422  0.45
Magin 1975   8  0.8231  0.0011  0.107  0.575  0.6311  0.60
Milkina 1970   32  0.7417  0.0146  0.0936  0.0910  0.6035  0.23
Mohovich 1999   48  0.6949  0.0041  0.0550  0.0514  0.5248  0.16
Nadelmann 1956   38  0.7229  0.0026  0.0832  0.143  0.5632  0.28
Ohlsson 1999   7  0.8215  0.0114  0.1312  0.522  0.729  0.61
Olejniczac 1990   27  0.7565  0.0043  0.0739  0.0716  0.5042  0.19
Olejniczak 1991   22  0.7521  0.0135  0.0644  0.0618  0.3950  0.15
Osinska 1989   6  0.824  0.045  0.161  0.718  0.606  0.65
Paderewski 1912   40  0.726  0.0316  0.0827  0.242  0.6026  0.38
Perahia 1994   58  0.5451  0.0055  0.0557  0.0520  0.4053  0.14
Perlemuter 1986   45  0.7053  0.0033  0.1134  0.1116  0.3638  0.20
Poblocka 1999   17  0.7854  0.0027  0.0924  0.2810  0.6125  0.41
Rangell 2001   11  0.8128  0.0020  0.1214  0.501  0.7113  0.60
Risler 1920   26  0.7523  0.0028  0.0925  0.284  0.6523  0.43
Rosen 1989   51  0.6639  0.0058  0.0461  0.0437  0.0863  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   54  0.6310  0.0237  0.0643  0.065  0.6341  0.19
Rubinstein 1952   29  0.7522  0.0034  0.0645  0.066  0.6143  0.19
Rubinstein 1966   46  0.6914  0.0139  0.0553  0.0516  0.4252  0.14
Rummel 1943   57  0.5827  0.0053  0.0556  0.0514  0.3156  0.12
Shebanova 2002   4  0.8316  0.018  0.146  0.594  0.763  0.67
Smith 1975   33  0.7413  0.0217  0.1121  0.412  0.7017  0.54
Szpilman 1948   44  0.7146  0.0040  0.0555  0.0518  0.5545  0.17
Uninsky 1971   36  0.7344  0.0031  0.1028  0.214  0.6029  0.35
Wasowski 1980   53  0.6526  0.0056  0.0647  0.0623  0.2555  0.12
Weissenberg 1971   13  0.8056  0.0013  0.1217  0.469  0.5619  0.51
Random 1    64  -0.0559  0.0064  0.0264  0.0256  0.0365  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0564  0.0063  0.0362  0.0324  0.2461  0.08
Random 3   65  -0.0560  0.0065  0.0265  0.0225  0.2164  0.06
Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).