Fou 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.63	58	0.00	50	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.08	55	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.76	4	0.06	20	0.15	20	0.37	11	0.48	23	0.42
Beliavsky 2004		48	0.65	51	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.07	53	0.06
BenOr 1989		2	0.83	3	0.07	2	0.52	1	0.79	2	0.76	1	0.77
Biret 1990		53	0.61	36	0.00	51	0.09	37	0.09	31	0.11	46	0.10
Blet 2003		40	0.69	62	0.00	38	0.08	43	0.08	19	0.30	44	0.15
Block 1995		28	0.73	25	0.00	33	0.14	33	0.14	12	0.53	28	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.66	37	0.00	46	0.06	51	0.06	6	0.63	34	0.19
Chiu 1999		14	0.77	34	0.00	17	0.19	18	0.50	13	0.51	19	0.50
Clidat 1994		32	0.72	43	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.24	22	0.25	33	0.24
Cohen 1997		61	0.45	44	0.00	62	0.06	53	0.06	40	0.06	56	0.06
Coop 1987		6	0.80	61	0.00	5	0.21	7	0.64	20	0.50	14	0.57
Cortot 1951		57	0.59	50	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	9	0.55	41	0.17
Czerny 1949		19	0.75	6	0.02	8	0.13	13	0.61	7	0.64	10	0.62
Czerny 1949b		15	0.76	10	0.01	14	0.22	11	0.61	9	0.63	8	0.62
Ezaki 2006		1	0.87	1	0.63	1	0.62	2	0.79	3	0.74	2	0.76
Falvay 1989		3	0.82	18	0.00	4	0.27	6	0.67	6	0.63	5	0.65
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.60	55	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	19	0.51	42	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		24	0.73	41	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	26	0.37	32	0.25
Fliere 1977		13	0.77	20	0.00	16	0.23	16	0.56	17	0.51	16	0.53
Fou 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Francois 1956		44	0.67	32	0.00	44	0.08	41	0.08	12	0.45	37	0.19
Hatto 1997		51	0.63	22	0.00	55	0.09	36	0.09	50	0.06	50	0.07
Horowitz 1971		54	0.61	38	0.00	54	0.08	42	0.08	56	0.05	57	0.06
Horowitz 1985		60	0.47	59	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	46	0.05	58	0.05
Indjic 2001		52	0.62	40	0.00	56	0.08	40	0.08	44	0.07	51	0.07
Kapell 1951		7	0.80	29	0.00	9	0.13	9	0.62	6	0.69	6	0.65
Kiepura 1999		29	0.73	30	0.00	34	0.13	34	0.13	11	0.52	29	0.26
Kilenyi 1937		12	0.78	35	0.00	12	0.23	15	0.59	9	0.66	9	0.62
Kissin 1993		8	0.80	14	0.01	15	0.26	8	0.63	19	0.42	18	0.51
Kitain 1937		62	0.38	57	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	44	0.05	63	0.04
Kushner 1990		18	0.75	2	0.07	7	0.15	4	0.71	3	0.72	4	0.71
Levy 1951		38	0.70	11	0.01	22	0.08	27	0.24	1	0.77	21	0.43
Luisada 1990		20	0.75	24	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.26	9	0.54	24	0.37
Lushtak 2004		26	0.73	46	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.17	21	0.40	30	0.26
Lympany 1968		45	0.67	54	0.00	45	0.07	49	0.07	34	0.11	47	0.09
Magaloff 1977		30	0.72	7	0.01	36	0.07	44	0.07	20	0.35	43	0.16
Magaloff 1977b		31	0.72	33	0.00	37	0.08	39	0.08	18	0.39	40	0.18
Magin 1975		4	0.81	16	0.00	10	0.15	5	0.67	16	0.54	12	0.60
Milkina 1970		37	0.70	48	0.00	42	0.05	54	0.05	28	0.16	48	0.09
Mohovich 1999		55	0.60	52	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	47	0.06	62	0.05
Nadelmann 1956		46	0.66	49	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	41	0.06	54	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		33	0.72	23	0.00	39	0.07	46	0.07	32	0.12	49	0.09
Olejniczac 1990		25	0.73	56	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.24	25	0.36	27	0.29
Olejniczak 1991		22	0.74	21	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.26	22	0.33	26	0.29
Osinska 1989		5	0.81	12	0.01	3	0.26	3	0.77	4	0.66	3	0.71
Paderewski 1912		43	0.68	15	0.01	41	0.07	45	0.07	19	0.26	45	0.13
Perahia 1994		59	0.51	26	0.00	59	0.06	52	0.06	53	0.05	61	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		39	0.69	45	0.00	25	0.07	29	0.22	31	0.15	38	0.18
Poblocka 1999		9	0.80	17	0.00	11	0.19	10	0.62	11	0.59	11	0.60
Rangell 2001		16	0.76	5	0.02	21	0.14	21	0.35	12	0.54	22	0.43
Risler 1920		36	0.70	42	0.00	35	0.10	35	0.10	26	0.36	35	0.19
Rosen 1989		11	0.79	8	0.01	13	0.27	14	0.61	3	0.66	7	0.63
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.56	28	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	43	0.06	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		21	0.75	13	0.01	19	0.21	17	0.50	5	0.65	15	0.57
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.68	27	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.08	13	0.45	36	0.19
Rummel 1943		49	0.63	39	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	6	0.44	39	0.18
Shebanova 2002		10	0.79	19	0.00	6	0.15	12	0.61	7	0.60	13	0.60
Smith 1975		41	0.69	60	0.00	43	0.06	50	0.06	56	0.04	59	0.05
Szpilman 1948		35	0.71	31	0.00	18	0.17	19	0.46	11	0.58	17	0.52
Uninsky 1971		27	0.73	53	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.24	11	0.48	25	0.34
Wasowski 1980		23	0.74	9	0.01	23	0.08	22	0.29	1	0.79	20	0.48
Weissenberg 1971		34	0.71	47	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.19	25	0.33	31	0.25
Random 1		64	-0.03	63	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	46	0.03	64	0.02
Random 2		63	-0.01	65	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	61	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		65	-0.04	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	21	0.23	52	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).