Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.62	31	0.00	42	0.07	38	0.07	23	0.34	43	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		33	0.68	40	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.16	25	0.19	38	0.17
Beliavsky 2004		26	0.69	52	0.00	48	0.07	34	0.07	15	0.40	35	0.17
BenOr 1989		21	0.71	56	0.00	21	0.11	16	0.42	25	0.24	28	0.32
Biret 1990		58	0.56	62	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	48	0.05	62	0.05
Blet 2003		54	0.59	49	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.06	22	0.23	48	0.12
Block 1995		48	0.63	47	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.07	27	0.32	44	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.64	6	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.56	41	0.15
Chiu 1999		37	0.67	27	0.00	11	0.14	20	0.40	22	0.42	21	0.41
Clidat 1994		18	0.72	46	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.43	6	0.51	15	0.47
Cohen 1997		62	0.32	65	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	49	0.05	61	0.05
Coop 1987		27	0.69	42	0.00	10	0.13	12	0.48	28	0.26	25	0.35
Cortot 1951		53	0.60	12	0.00	59	0.06	49	0.06	5	0.69	30	0.20
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1949b		1	0.94	1	0.95	1	0.94	1	0.97	1	0.98	1	0.97
Ezaki 2006		4	0.77	28	0.00	4	0.32	4	0.74	10	0.65	4	0.69
Falvay 1989		29	0.69	48	0.00	9	0.13	14	0.44	24	0.37	22	0.40
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.51	19	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	27	0.30	50	0.11
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.72	54	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.40	13	0.55	16	0.47
Fliere 1977		9	0.74	16	0.00	12	0.12	9	0.53	20	0.48	10	0.50
Fou 1978		6	0.75	35	0.00	8	0.20	7	0.64	13	0.61	6	0.62
Francois 1956		40	0.66	57	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	29	0.18	55	0.09
Hatto 1997		56	0.57	20	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	37	0.07	58	0.06
Horowitz 1971		45	0.63	50	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.06	16	0.44	39	0.16
Horowitz 1985		55	0.57	4	0.01	56	0.04	61	0.04	9	0.54	40	0.15
Indjic 2001		59	0.56	29	0.00	58	0.05	54	0.05	54	0.06	60	0.05
Kapell 1951		23	0.70	25	0.00	18	0.10	13	0.46	20	0.43	18	0.44
Kiepura 1999		12	0.73	10	0.00	16	0.10	25	0.33	3	0.63	17	0.46
Kilenyi 1937		11	0.73	11	0.00	7	0.25	8	0.56	18	0.54	9	0.55
Kissin 1993		8	0.74	2	0.01	2	0.31	6	0.67	11	0.54	7	0.60
Kitain 1937		61	0.48	23	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	24	0.26	49	0.12
Kushner 1990		36	0.67	60	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.21	30	0.13	36	0.17
Levy 1951		47	0.63	17	0.00	35	0.06	46	0.06	8	0.59	31	0.19
Luisada 1990		7	0.74	22	0.00	20	0.14	10	0.52	3	0.63	8	0.57
Lushtak 2004		30	0.69	36	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.08	27	0.26	45	0.14
Lympany 1968		39	0.66	15	0.00	47	0.07	35	0.07	33	0.13	52	0.10
Magaloff 1977		34	0.67	58	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	22	0.31	42	0.15
Magaloff 1977b		38	0.66	55	0.00	41	0.06	51	0.06	30	0.22	51	0.11
Magin 1975		5	0.77	5	0.00	3	0.23	5	0.73	2	0.68	3	0.70
Milkina 1970		42	0.64	59	0.00	49	0.06	44	0.06	44	0.06	57	0.06
Mohovich 1999		44	0.64	34	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	40	0.07	59	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		31	0.69	21	0.00	28	0.12	26	0.29	6	0.46	23	0.37
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.61	51	0.00	33	0.07	37	0.07	24	0.23	46	0.13
Olejniczac 1990		14	0.73	37	0.00	22	0.14	18	0.41	11	0.55	14	0.47
Olejniczak 1991		22	0.71	63	0.00	26	0.09	24	0.33	20	0.36	26	0.34
Osinska 1989		3	0.77	3	0.01	5	0.30	3	0.74	14	0.56	5	0.64
Paderewski 1912		10	0.73	13	0.00	14	0.10	19	0.41	1	0.62	11	0.50
Perahia 1994		57	0.56	39	0.00	60	0.06	45	0.06	31	0.17	53	0.10
Perlemuter 1986		16	0.73	26	0.00	27	0.09	30	0.19	28	0.20	32	0.19
Poblocka 1999		2	0.78	8	0.00	6	0.33	2	0.76	2	0.73	2	0.74
Rangell 2001		28	0.69	32	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.27	22	0.42	27	0.34
Risler 1920		24	0.70	53	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.38	9	0.59	13	0.47
Rosen 1989		41	0.65	7	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.06	15	0.47	37	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.61	9	0.00	39	0.06	47	0.06	25	0.25	47	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.67	38	0.00	36	0.05	53	0.05	30	0.20	54	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.61	44	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.05	64	0.04
Rummel 1943		25	0.70	18	0.00	44	0.06	48	0.06	2	0.61	33	0.19
Shebanova 2002		20	0.71	24	0.00	19	0.13	11	0.50	18	0.37	20	0.43
Smith 1975		15	0.73	41	0.00	25	0.09	27	0.29	11	0.45	24	0.36
Szpilman 1948		19	0.71	45	0.00	13	0.10	17	0.41	14	0.58	12	0.49
Uninsky 1971		13	0.73	30	0.00	17	0.11	22	0.39	9	0.50	19	0.44
Wasowski 1980		32	0.68	14	0.00	46	0.06	40	0.06	11	0.48	34	0.17
Weissenberg 1971		46	0.63	33	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.18	29	0.27	29	0.22
Random 1		65	-0.04	64	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	32	0.10	63	0.04
Random 2		63	-0.01	61	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	44	0.05	65	0.04
Random 3		64	-0.03	43	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	24	0.22	56	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).