Afanassiev 2001

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Ashkenazy 1981   4  0.7219  0.014  0.128  0.5717  0.367  0.45
Beliavsky 2004   29  0.6435  0.0021  0.1320  0.387  0.528  0.44
BenOr 1989   16  0.6710  0.0111  0.1019  0.3851  0.0630  0.15
Biret 1990   25  0.6537  0.0041  0.0549  0.0560  0.0465  0.04
Blet 2003   35  0.6358  0.0040  0.1033  0.1030  0.1136  0.10
Block 1995   52  0.5744  0.0054  0.0457  0.0440  0.0661  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   60  0.5050  0.0062  0.0646  0.0656  0.0650  0.06
Chiu 1999   43  0.6234  0.0037  0.0739  0.0746  0.0651  0.06
Clidat 1994   18  0.6739  0.0023  0.1118  0.3858  0.0532  0.14
Cohen 1997   58  0.5749  0.0056  0.0461  0.047  0.6227  0.16
Coop 1987   24  0.656  0.0222  0.1216  0.4235  0.0824  0.18
Cortot 1951   59  0.5559  0.0061  0.0643  0.0636  0.0847  0.07
Czerny 1949   41  0.6252  0.0020  0.0823  0.3438  0.0728  0.15
Czerny 1949b   26  0.6527  0.009  0.1511  0.5127  0.1918  0.31
Ezaki 2006   19  0.675  0.0327  0.1127  0.2942  0.0731  0.14
Falvay 1989   27  0.647  0.0230  0.0831  0.1637  0.1033  0.13
Ferenczy 1958   57  0.5756  0.0057  0.0462  0.0443  0.0659  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   28  0.6431  0.0035  0.0838  0.0844  0.0746  0.07
Fliere 1977   8  0.6951  0.005  0.137  0.5731  0.1817  0.32
Fou 1978   34  0.6320  0.0138  0.0837  0.0855  0.0553  0.06
Francois 1956   33  0.6330  0.0015  0.0925  0.326  0.5711  0.43
Hatto 1997   7  0.7043  0.0013  0.1013  0.488  0.535  0.50
Horowitz 1971   23  0.668  0.0126  0.1228  0.2712  0.4814  0.36
Horowitz 1985   47  0.6038  0.0049  0.0548  0.055  0.5725  0.17
Indjic 2001   6  0.7021  0.0112  0.0912  0.498  0.526  0.50
Kapell 1951   39  0.6361  0.0039  0.1034  0.1048  0.0641  0.08
Kiepura 1999   42  0.6226  0.0047  0.0644  0.0638  0.0748  0.06
Kilenyi 1937   38  0.6318  0.0116  0.0815  0.4341  0.0726  0.17
Kissin 1993   2  0.751  0.451  0.442  0.7316  0.473  0.59
Kitain 1937   62  0.3412  0.0160  0.0552  0.0514  0.4829  0.15
Kushner 1990   15  0.6822  0.0117  0.099  0.5222  0.2415  0.35
Levy 1951   56  0.5714  0.0153  0.0456  0.0460  0.0463  0.04
Luisada 1990   46  0.6153  0.0045  0.0551  0.0545  0.0660  0.05
Lushtak 2004   20  0.6645  0.0018  0.1017  0.4232  0.1522  0.25
Lympany 1968   31  0.6447  0.0046  0.0742  0.0739  0.0842  0.07
Magaloff 1977   11  0.6940  0.0024  0.1121  0.3719  0.3613  0.36
Magaloff 1977b   12  0.6946  0.0025  0.1522  0.3523  0.3216  0.33
Magin 1975   44  0.6242  0.0043  0.0459  0.0462  0.0464  0.04
Milkina 1970   3  0.7311  0.017  0.173  0.6515  0.561  0.60
Mohovich 1999   45  0.6128  0.0033  0.0740  0.0735  0.0845  0.07
Nadelmann 1956   22  0.6615  0.0119  0.1024  0.3324  0.2221  0.27
Ohlsson 1999   32  0.6316  0.0132  0.0732  0.1334  0.0935  0.11
Olejniczac 1990   30  0.6464  0.0036  0.0936  0.0951  0.0644  0.07
Olejniczak 1991   36  0.6365  0.0044  0.0550  0.0555  0.0658  0.05
Osinska 1989   1  0.752  0.182  0.491  0.7930  0.2212  0.42
Paderewski 1912   17  0.6733  0.0014  0.0814  0.4411  0.4210  0.43
Perahia 1994   54  0.5748  0.0055  0.0554  0.0523  0.3434  0.13
Perlemuter 1986   13  0.6817  0.018  0.156  0.6018  0.319  0.43
Poblocka 1999   49  0.6054  0.0050  0.0460  0.0443  0.0756  0.05
Rangell 2001   51  0.5862  0.0051  0.0555  0.0540  0.0662  0.05
Risler 1920   55  0.5741  0.0052  0.0547  0.0547  0.0657  0.05
Rosen 1989   53  0.5729  0.0058  0.0553  0.0539  0.0755  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   37  0.634  0.0429  0.0730  0.1612  0.4420  0.27
Rubinstein 1952   21  0.6636  0.0031  0.0929  0.1838  0.0639  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   14  0.6825  0.0028  0.1026  0.3124  0.3219  0.31
Rummel 1943   61  0.4923  0.0059  0.0458  0.0432  0.0854  0.06
Shebanova 2002   9  0.6913  0.0110  0.1410  0.5235  0.0823  0.20
Smith 1975   10  0.693  0.083  0.194  0.638  0.504  0.56
Szpilman 1948   5  0.719  0.016  0.155  0.6012  0.582  0.59
Uninsky 1971   40  0.6363  0.0034  0.0935  0.0942  0.0643  0.07
Wasowski 1980   48  0.6024  0.0042  0.0645  0.0643  0.0649  0.06
Weissenberg 1971   50  0.5932  0.0048  0.0741  0.0745  0.0652  0.06
Random 1    65  0.0055  0.0064  0.0264  0.029  0.4140  0.09
Random 2   63  0.0960  0.0063  0.0363  0.0319  0.3537  0.10
Random 3   64  0.0057  0.0065  0.0265  0.027  0.4638  0.10
Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).