Fliere 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.69	40	0.00	40	0.07	41	0.07	43	0.08	46	0.07
Bacha 1997		34	0.75	19	0.00	34	0.10	35	0.10	25	0.23	36	0.15
Barbosa 1983		26	0.80	35	0.00	30	0.12	28	0.12	16	0.50	27	0.24
Biret 1990		43	0.70	34	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.07	45	0.06	50	0.06
Block 1995		50	0.63	43	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	31	0.07	48	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		21	0.82	24	0.00	26	0.12	24	0.23	13	0.58	20	0.37
Chiu 1999		10	0.84	21	0.00	17	0.12	18	0.39	12	0.56	16	0.47
Clidat 1994		13	0.84	5	0.03	5	0.16	14	0.45	10	0.49	17	0.47
Cohen 1997		33	0.76	36	0.00	33	0.13	27	0.13	21	0.37	30	0.22
Cortot 1951		48	0.64	52	0.00	46	0.04	49	0.04	28	0.11	47	0.07
Csalog 1996		8	0.84	16	0.01	15	0.13	15	0.44	20	0.34	19	0.39
Czerny 1990		31	0.78	7	0.02	21	0.09	26	0.16	24	0.22	34	0.19
Ezaki 2006		17	0.82	13	0.01	23	0.09	23	0.23	24	0.25	26	0.24
Ferenczy 1958		2	0.88	2	0.17	2	0.43	2	0.82	2	0.87	1	0.84
Fliere 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fou 1978		23	0.81	30	0.00	29	0.08	38	0.08	21	0.44	33	0.19
Francois 1956		25	0.80	15	0.01	18	0.13	17	0.40	2	0.73	10	0.54
Grinberg 1951		36	0.74	41	0.00	38	0.11	31	0.11	50	0.06	45	0.08
Hatto 1993		11	0.84	10	0.01	9	0.12	8	0.54	15	0.60	8	0.57
Hatto 1997		15	0.83	26	0.00	13	0.11	10	0.52	19	0.42	15	0.47
Indjic 2001		14	0.83	20	0.00	10	0.13	7	0.55	16	0.51	11	0.53
Jonas 1947		32	0.77	27	0.00	32	0.11	32	0.11	17	0.47	28	0.23
Kapell 1951		5	0.85	4	0.03	14	0.11	9	0.53	19	0.43	13	0.48
Kiepura 1999		41	0.70	48	0.00	37	0.11	30	0.11	8	0.44	29	0.22
Kushner 1989		28	0.80	25	0.00	22	0.07	25	0.20	22	0.42	23	0.29
Luisada 1991		49	0.64	28	0.00	50	0.07	40	0.07	29	0.09	44	0.08
Lushtak 2004		22	0.81	17	0.00	19	0.12	19	0.35	9	0.60	18	0.46
Magaloff 1978		7	0.84	29	0.00	7	0.10	6	0.55	3	0.78	4	0.65
Meguri 1997		20	0.82	37	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.27	29	0.11	35	0.17
Milkina 1970		4	0.85	18	0.00	11	0.12	5	0.60	4	0.72	2	0.66
Mohovich 1999		18	0.82	22	0.00	12	0.11	16	0.41	11	0.59	12	0.49
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.73	38	0.00	31	0.08	39	0.08	18	0.43	32	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.86	3	0.07	4	0.24	3	0.70	10	0.63	3	0.66
Olejniczak 1990		30	0.78	47	0.00	36	0.12	29	0.12	31	0.10	41	0.11
Osinska 1989		27	0.80	14	0.01	28	0.10	34	0.10	5	0.67	25	0.26
Rangell 2001		38	0.73	49	0.00	39	0.09	36	0.09	15	0.44	31	0.20
Richter 1976		12	0.84	12	0.01	8	0.10	12	0.49	4	0.75	6	0.61
Rubinstein 1938		47	0.66	45	0.00	45	0.04	50	0.04	29	0.07	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.72	42	0.00	41	0.06	44	0.06	25	0.21	42	0.11
Rubinstein 1961		44	0.69	39	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	21	0.37	38	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.70	31	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	20	0.41	39	0.14
Shebanova 2002		19	0.82	23	0.00	25	0.09	22	0.25	10	0.47	21	0.34
Smidowicz 1948		24	0.80	11	0.01	20	0.15	20	0.32	19	0.34	22	0.33
Smidowicz 1948b		29	0.79	44	0.00	27	0.09	37	0.09	24	0.24	37	0.15
Smith 1975		35	0.74	32	0.00	35	0.10	33	0.10	4	0.71	24	0.27
Sofronitsky 1949		39	0.73	33	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.07	27	0.12	43	0.09
Sztompka 1959		46	0.69	50	0.00	43	0.06	46	0.06	38	0.06	49	0.06
Tomsic 1995		16	0.83	9	0.02	6	0.14	11	0.51	9	0.61	9	0.56
Uninsky 1971		9	0.84	8	0.02	16	0.18	13	0.48	16	0.48	14	0.48
Wasowski 1980		6	0.85	6	0.03	3	0.22	4	0.62	3	0.66	5	0.64
Average Tempo		1	0.90	1	0.51	1	0.50	1	0.86	18	0.41	7	0.59
Random 1		51	0.03	51	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	7	0.37	40	0.11
Random 2		53	-0.02	46	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	47	0.03	53	0.02
Random 3		52	0.01	53	0.00	52	0.03	52	0.03	30	0.06	52	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).