Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		35	0.78	43	0.00	35	0.07	39	0.07	9	0.49	32	0.19
Bacha 1997		33	0.79	21	0.00	36	0.10	29	0.10	23	0.27	41	0.16
Barbosa 1983		20	0.82	19	0.00	17	0.18	16	0.40	5	0.61	14	0.49
Biret 1990		34	0.79	12	0.01	32	0.07	36	0.07	18	0.56	31	0.20
Block 1995		50	0.66	40	0.00	50	0.07	34	0.07	28	0.08	52	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		24	0.81	22	0.00	29	0.08	32	0.08	24	0.34	42	0.16
Chiu 1999		26	0.80	14	0.00	20	0.12	20	0.29	16	0.49	22	0.38
Clidat 1994		16	0.83	7	0.02	18	0.10	18	0.36	11	0.44	21	0.40
Cohen 1997		37	0.76	34	0.00	33	0.07	38	0.07	14	0.46	38	0.18
Cortot 1951		47	0.70	45	0.00	43	0.05	49	0.05	23	0.29	47	0.12
Csalog 1996		8	0.85	38	0.00	9	0.20	11	0.57	13	0.46	13	0.51
Czerny 1990		21	0.81	28	0.00	13	0.14	13	0.48	12	0.55	12	0.51
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ferenczy 1958		11	0.85	37	0.00	11	0.19	9	0.59	12	0.62	9	0.60
Fliere 1977		18	0.82	13	0.00	25	0.12	24	0.25	23	0.23	27	0.24
Fou 1978		19	0.82	9	0.01	24	0.09	22	0.27	3	0.63	20	0.41
Francois 1956		48	0.69	20	0.00	46	0.07	35	0.07	32	0.11	50	0.09
Grinberg 1951		31	0.80	10	0.01	19	0.10	21	0.29	14	0.51	23	0.38
Hatto 1993		9	0.85	26	0.00	6	0.18	7	0.61	13	0.68	7	0.64
Hatto 1997		7	0.86	16	0.00	4	0.24	4	0.72	11	0.69	3	0.70
Indjic 2001		6	0.86	41	0.00	5	0.25	5	0.68	12	0.68	5	0.68
Jonas 1947		32	0.79	24	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.17	15	0.50	24	0.29
Kapell 1951		3	0.87	6	0.02	3	0.22	3	0.74	9	0.67	4	0.70
Kiepura 1999		49	0.68	30	0.00	40	0.06	47	0.06	3	0.54	37	0.18
Kushner 1989		12	0.83	11	0.01	15	0.13	14	0.45	15	0.50	16	0.47
Luisada 1991		41	0.72	15	0.00	41	0.05	48	0.05	17	0.38	45	0.14
Lushtak 2004		23	0.81	32	0.00	28	0.11	27	0.11	15	0.57	25	0.25
Magaloff 1978		30	0.80	17	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.08	11	0.60	28	0.22
Meguri 1997		10	0.85	4	0.02	10	0.17	10	0.59	14	0.54	11	0.56
Milkina 1970		15	0.83	36	0.00	21	0.10	19	0.32	9	0.60	18	0.44
Mohovich 1999		2	0.88	8	0.02	2	0.50	2	0.78	2	0.77	1	0.77
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.72	44	0.00	37	0.09	31	0.09	27	0.11	48	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		4	0.87	5	0.02	7	0.22	6	0.66	9	0.64	6	0.65
Olejniczak 1990		13	0.83	50	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.39	9	0.57	17	0.47
Osinska 1989		25	0.81	3	0.04	23	0.08	23	0.26	4	0.68	19	0.42
Rangell 2001		38	0.76	49	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.06	8	0.61	34	0.19
Richter 1976		28	0.80	29	0.00	30	0.06	44	0.06	6	0.58	33	0.19
Rubinstein 1938		43	0.72	27	0.00	47	0.06	41	0.06	12	0.40	44	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.74	35	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	9	0.50	40	0.17
Rubinstein 1961		45	0.71	23	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	10	0.62	39	0.18
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.71	33	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	12	0.62	36	0.19
Shebanova 2002		17	0.83	25	0.00	14	0.13	15	0.41	7	0.57	15	0.48
Smidowicz 1948		22	0.81	46	0.00	22	0.08	25	0.23	23	0.27	26	0.25
Smidowicz 1948b		27	0.80	47	0.00	27	0.09	30	0.09	22	0.30	43	0.16
Smith 1975		42	0.72	39	0.00	44	0.07	37	0.07	7	0.60	30	0.20
Sofronitsky 1949		36	0.78	48	0.00	38	0.10	28	0.10	14	0.46	29	0.21
Sztompka 1959		39	0.75	31	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.07	11	0.50	35	0.19
Tomsic 1995		14	0.83	18	0.00	12	0.13	12	0.56	8	0.62	10	0.59
Uninsky 1971		5	0.86	2	0.05	8	0.25	8	0.60	10	0.62	8	0.61
Wasowski 1980		29	0.80	42	0.00	31	0.06	42	0.06	27	0.12	51	0.08
Average Tempo		1	0.91	1	0.76	1	0.75	1	0.92	11	0.63	2	0.76
Random 1		52	0.03	53	0.00	51	0.03	52	0.03	14	0.27	49	0.09
Random 2		53	-0.04	51	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	50	0.02	53	0.02
Random 3		51	0.04	52	0.00	52	0.03	51	0.03	4	0.53	46	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).