Smidowicz 1948

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.74	30	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.08	19	0.34	36	0.16
Bacha 1997		23	0.81	3	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.29	13	0.49	16	0.38
Barbosa 1983		36	0.76	16	0.00	31	0.12	26	0.12	23	0.32	31	0.20
Biret 1990		24	0.81	44	0.00	20	0.09	21	0.27	14	0.61	15	0.41
Block 1995		40	0.73	45	0.00	40	0.07	46	0.07	1	0.65	30	0.21
Brailowsky 1960		14	0.82	31	0.00	12	0.11	14	0.43	11	0.58	9	0.50
Chiu 1999		37	0.75	7	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.08	30	0.09	43	0.08
Clidat 1994		20	0.81	21	0.00	25	0.11	25	0.20	20	0.25	28	0.22
Cohen 1997		32	0.77	17	0.00	32	0.08	34	0.08	18	0.37	35	0.17
Cortot 1951		30	0.77	37	0.00	27	0.10	28	0.10	6	0.71	24	0.27
Csalog 1996		11	0.83	6	0.00	9	0.19	8	0.55	13	0.45	10	0.50
Czerny 1990		4	0.85	38	0.00	5	0.30	6	0.62	5	0.68	6	0.65
Ezaki 2006		25	0.81	39	0.00	22	0.09	22	0.27	24	0.23	25	0.25
Ferenczy 1958		27	0.80	9	0.00	15	0.07	19	0.30	21	0.29	22	0.29
Fliere 1977		26	0.80	24	0.00	19	0.09	18	0.34	19	0.32	20	0.33
Fou 1978		35	0.76	46	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.07	28	0.09	44	0.08
Francois 1956		41	0.71	25	0.00	33	0.07	43	0.07	12	0.49	33	0.19
Grinberg 1951		29	0.77	18	0.00	30	0.09	31	0.09	14	0.49	29	0.21
Hatto 1993		15	0.82	10	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.41	20	0.36	17	0.38
Hatto 1997		16	0.81	32	0.00	18	0.18	17	0.41	21	0.22	21	0.30
Indjic 2001		17	0.81	12	0.00	16	0.07	15	0.42	22	0.30	19	0.35
Jonas 1947		5	0.85	8	0.00	4	0.35	4	0.70	2	0.81	3	0.75
Kapell 1951		8	0.84	22	0.00	10	0.25	10	0.52	17	0.44	13	0.48
Kiepura 1999		47	0.66	13	0.00	44	0.09	33	0.09	28	0.10	41	0.09
Kushner 1989		13	0.82	11	0.00	13	0.12	12	0.47	13	0.52	11	0.49
Luisada 1991		43	0.70	47	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.07	20	0.33	38	0.15
Lushtak 2004		6	0.85	5	0.00	6	0.20	5	0.63	1	0.77	4	0.70
Magaloff 1978		42	0.70	48	0.00	43	0.07	45	0.07	29	0.08	45	0.07
Meguri 1997		2	0.87	40	0.00	3	0.42	3	0.76	8	0.65	5	0.70
Milkina 1970		31	0.77	33	0.00	35	0.07	47	0.07	36	0.06	47	0.06
Mohovich 1999		3	0.85	2	0.00	8	0.20	7	0.55	9	0.59	7	0.57
Niedzielski 1931		7	0.84	4	0.00	2	0.31	2	0.77	2	0.88	2	0.82
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.79	19	0.00	28	0.10	29	0.10	26	0.12	40	0.11
Olejniczak 1990		19	0.81	34	0.00	23	0.12	23	0.27	13	0.48	18	0.36
Osinska 1989		33	0.77	14	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	13	0.36	34	0.17
Rangell 2001		39	0.73	41	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.07	18	0.36	37	0.16
Richter 1976		34	0.76	49	0.00	34	0.09	32	0.09	12	0.42	32	0.19
Rubinstein 1938		44	0.69	42	0.00	46	0.08	37	0.08	43	0.06	46	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.67	26	0.00	47	0.07	44	0.07	46	0.05	49	0.06
Rubinstein 1961		49	0.65	43	0.00	49	0.07	40	0.07	40	0.06	48	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.65	35	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.06	51	0.05
Shebanova 2002		21	0.81	15	0.00	24	0.11	24	0.21	18	0.30	26	0.25
Smidowicz 1948		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smidowicz 1948b		1	0.99	1	1.00	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Smith 1975		45	0.68	36	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	24	0.20	39	0.11
Sofronitsky 1949		22	0.81	23	0.00	26	0.10	30	0.10	1	0.63	27	0.25
Sztompka 1959		18	0.81	20	0.00	29	0.10	27	0.10	3	0.71	23	0.27
Tomsic 1995		9	0.83	27	0.00	7	0.17	9	0.53	9	0.61	8	0.57
Uninsky 1971		12	0.82	28	0.00	14	0.10	13	0.44	16	0.41	14	0.42
Wasowski 1980		10	0.83	29	0.00	11	0.11	11	0.49	10	0.48	12	0.48
Random 1		50	0.06	50	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	13	0.26	42	0.09
Random 2		52	-0.02	51	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	39	0.04	52	0.03
Random 3		51	0.00	52	0.00	51	0.02	51	0.02	21	0.15	50	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).