Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	3	0.66	18	0.00	8	0.14	6	0.55	3	0.60	4	0.57
Anderszewski 2003	45	0.50	33	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.26	20	0.43	31	0.33
Ashkenazy 1981	42	0.52	62	0.00	27	0.10	26	0.34	32	0.34	29	0.34
Bacha 2000	76	0.39	26	0.00	71	0.05	69	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.05
Badura 1965	24	0.55	7	0.01	17	0.13	18	0.44	4	0.61	9	0.52
Barbosa 1983	52	0.49	8	0.01	35	0.07	34	0.24	15	0.45	30	0.33
Biret 1990	43	0.51	40	0.00	43	0.05	40	0.15	40	0.15	43	0.15
Blet 2003	21	0.56	79	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.24	16	0.43	32	0.32
Block 1995	60	0.46	60	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.06	71	0.05
Blumental 1952	46	0.50	54	0.00	24	0.08	35	0.21	8	0.41	34	0.29
Boshniakovich 1969	17	0.57	6	0.02	31	0.09	25	0.35	18	0.45	23	0.40
Brailowsky 1960	68	0.42	21	0.00	77	0.05	66	0.05	50	0.06	64	0.05
Bunin 1987	9	0.60	67	0.00	19	0.16	14	0.46	5	0.56	12	0.51
Bunin 1987b	12	0.60	31	0.00	18	0.15	13	0.46	5	0.57	10	0.51
Chiu 1999	74	0.40	43	0.00	69	0.05	63	0.05	75	0.03	74	0.04
Cohen 1997	88	0.24	66	0.00	78	0.04	81	0.04	55	0.05	80	0.04
Cortot 1951	26	0.55	77	0.00	25	0.08	29	0.31	5	0.63	20	0.44
Csalog 1996	75	0.39	72	0.00	62	0.04	73	0.04	42	0.14	54	0.07
Czerny 1949	4	0.65	24	0.00	7	0.13	5	0.55	12	0.58	6	0.56
Czerny 1990	11	0.60	50	0.00	23	0.09	19	0.42	27	0.30	28	0.35
Duchoud 2007	50	0.49	84	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.10	19	0.43	38	0.21
Ezaki 2006	13	0.60	85	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.37	25	0.40	25	0.38
Falvay 1989	73	0.40	56	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.03
Farrell 1958	70	0.41	39	0.00	72	0.05	59	0.05	61	0.05	65	0.05
Ferenczy 1958	18	0.57	11	0.01	22	0.13	30	0.30	5	0.59	22	0.42
Fliere 1977	14	0.59	9	0.01	28	0.13	21	0.40	43	0.11	37	0.21
Fou 1978	65	0.43	51	0.00	68	0.05	60	0.05	81	0.04	77	0.04
Francois 1956	47	0.50	59	0.00	58	0.05	65	0.05	43	0.13	52	0.08
Friedman 1923	71	0.41	76	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.13	8	0.57	36	0.27
Friedman 1923b	69	0.41	64	0.00	34	0.07	37	0.18	8	0.57	33	0.32
Friedman 1930	72	0.41	73	0.00	47	0.05	68	0.05	20	0.42	44	0.14
Garcia 2007	79	0.37	89	0.00	70	0.04	74	0.04	47	0.07	70	0.05
Garcia 2007b	81	0.36	38	0.00	63	0.04	75	0.04	27	0.22	50	0.09
Gierzod 1998	10	0.60	5	0.02	15	0.14	9	0.52	16	0.50	11	0.51
Gornostaeva 1994	40	0.52	27	0.00	59	0.05	64	0.05	64	0.04	81	0.04
Groot 1988	48	0.50	46	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	53	0.05	72	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955	15	0.59	3	0.04	3	0.32	3	0.67	4	0.55	2	0.61
Hatto 1993	56	0.47	42	0.00	13	0.09	16	0.44	13	0.47	19	0.45
Hatto 1997	38	0.52	14	0.01	4	0.15	4	0.58	7	0.50	7	0.54
Horowitz 1949	55	0.48	55	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	28	0.42	41	0.16
Indjic 1988	53	0.49	20	0.00	12	0.10	15	0.45	11	0.50	16	0.47
Kapell 1951	6	0.63	45	0.00	11	0.16	11	0.47	8	0.48	15	0.47
Kissin 1993	28	0.55	25	0.00	53	0.06	54	0.06	52	0.06	59	0.06
Kushner 1989	36	0.53	74	0.00	56	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.05	66	0.05
Luisada 1991	57	0.47	29	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	52	0.06	63	0.05
Lushtak 2004	49	0.50	41	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.27	43	0.13	39	0.19
Malcuzynski 1961	19	0.57	69	0.00	6	0.12	24	0.36	19	0.35	27	0.35
Magaloff 1978	63	0.45	35	0.00	65	0.04	80	0.04	73	0.04	75	0.04
Magin 1975	41	0.52	34	0.00	39	0.05	44	0.10	41	0.11	48	0.10
Michalowski 1933	44	0.51	90	0.00	20	0.13	22	0.39	5	0.54	17	0.46
Milkina 1970	37	0.52	22	0.00	54	0.06	51	0.06	51	0.07	58	0.06
Mohovich 1999	27	0.55	17	0.00	51	0.08	46	0.08	43	0.14	47	0.11
Moravec 1969	64	0.44	19	0.00	76	0.05	62	0.05	72	0.04	73	0.04
Morozova 2008	39	0.52	68	0.00	48	0.05	61	0.05	50	0.06	69	0.05
Neighaus 1950	20	0.57	58	0.00	14	0.11	12	0.47	17	0.44	18	0.45
Niedzielski 1931	62	0.46	63	0.00	64	0.04	78	0.04	41	0.12	53	0.07
Ohlsson 1999	31	0.54	4	0.02	21	0.09	20	0.41	24	0.37	24	0.39
Osinska 1989	29	0.54	80	0.00	52	0.06	57	0.06	49	0.06	55	0.06
Pachmann 1927	80	0.37	71	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	50	0.06	68	0.05
Paderewski 1930	58	0.47	65	0.00	61	0.06	56	0.06	27	0.25	45	0.12
Perlemuter 1992	25	0.55	28	0.00	33	0.08	28	0.31	13	0.47	26	0.38
Pierdomenico 2008	82	0.34	81	0.00	83	0.04	76	0.04	68	0.04	76	0.04
Poblocka 1999	5	0.65	15	0.00	10	0.16	10	0.49	10	0.48	13	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932	30	0.54	13	0.01	41	0.06	36	0.19	17	0.38	35	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923	59	0.46	87	0.00	50	0.07	48	0.07	55	0.05	56	0.06
Rangell 2001	66	0.42	78	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	53	0.05	82	0.04
Richter 1976	22	0.56	57	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.34	9	0.54	21	0.43
Rosen 1989	33	0.53	44	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.12	50	0.06	51	0.08
Rosenthal 1930	61	0.46	23	0.00	73	0.07	49	0.07	41	0.16	46	0.11
Rosenthal 1931	83	0.30	88	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b	84	0.29	70	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c	78	0.38	47	0.00	80	0.02	88	0.02	74	0.03	91	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d	86	0.29	52	0.00	88	0.04	79	0.04	73	0.03	86	0.03
Rossi 2007	87	0.28	75	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	66	0.04	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1939	85	0.29	30	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.03	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1952	77	0.38	48	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	69	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966	67	0.42	49	0.00	74	0.05	67	0.05	72	0.04	78	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960	8	0.62	16	0.00	5	0.13	7	0.54	4	0.59	5	0.56
Shebanova 2002	32	0.54	37	0.00	46	0.06	53	0.06	51	0.06	60	0.06
Smith 1975	23	0.56	10	0.01	38	0.05	38	0.17	44	0.14	42	0.15
Sokolov 2002	16	0.58	12	0.01	16	0.11	17	0.44	5	0.52	14	0.48
Sztompka 1959	7	0.62	61	0.00	9	0.12	8	0.53	11	0.51	8	0.52
Tomsic 1995	54	0.48	82	0.00	67	0.04	77	0.04	53	0.06	67	0.05
Uninsky 1932	1	0.78	1	0.71	1	0.70	1	0.84	1	0.88	1	0.86
Uninsky 1971	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980	51	0.49	32	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.12	30	0.26	40	0.18
Zak 1937	34	0.53	36	0.00	49	0.07	47	0.07	52	0.05	57	0.06
Zak 1951	35	0.53	53	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.16	52	0.06	49	0.10
Average	2	0.72	2	0.06	2	0.43	2	0.80	26	0.42	3	0.58
Random 1	89	-0.01	86	0.00	89	0.01	90	0.01	12	0.37	61	0.06
Random 2	90	-0.03	83	0.00	90	0.01	89	0.01	34	0.20	79	0.04
Random 3	91	-0.04	91	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	57	0.03	89	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).