Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	8	0.62	33	0.00	4	0.11	5	0.53	17	0.50	5	0.51
Anderszewski 2003	39	0.53	66	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	31	0.24	43	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981	7	0.62	19	0.00	6	0.12	7	0.51	16	0.50	8	0.50
Bacha 2000	79	0.39	81	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	41	0.15	73	0.07
Badura 1965	13	0.59	4	0.02	8	0.12	9	0.49	2	0.66	3	0.57
Barbosa 1983	42	0.53	31	0.00	27	0.05	37	0.17	21	0.38	32	0.25
Biret 1990	58	0.50	72	0.00	48	0.05	61	0.05	41	0.15	70	0.09
Blet 2003	41	0.53	71	0.00	59	0.05	63	0.05	31	0.21	63	0.10
Block 1995	65	0.45	86	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	51	0.05	84	0.04
Blumental 1952	44	0.53	12	0.01	28	0.04	38	0.16	24	0.27	38	0.21
Boshniakovich 1969	17	0.58	49	0.00	21	0.07	23	0.29	20	0.41	19	0.34
Brailowsky 1960	62	0.48	51	0.00	67	0.04	71	0.04	26	0.38	52	0.12
Bunin 1987	61	0.49	36	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	27	0.32	48	0.14
Bunin 1987b	59	0.49	16	0.00	45	0.06	42	0.12	25	0.34	39	0.20
Chiu 1999	16	0.58	9	0.01	20	0.08	16	0.38	8	0.60	10	0.48
Cohen 1997	88	0.28	55	0.00	88	0.04	72	0.04	50	0.05	85	0.04
Cortot 1951	64	0.45	62	0.00	78	0.04	78	0.04	36	0.18	72	0.08
Csalog 1996	87	0.32	75	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	55	0.05	83	0.04
Czerny 1949	23	0.56	63	0.00	15	0.12	14	0.42	20	0.45	15	0.43
Czerny 1990	6	0.62	22	0.00	3	0.11	8	0.50	14	0.51	9	0.50
Duchoud 2007	55	0.50	30	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.13	13	0.47	33	0.25
Ezaki 2006	5	0.63	32	0.00	9	0.09	15	0.40	21	0.42	16	0.41
Falvay 1989	49	0.51	54	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.13	74	0.07
Farrell 1958	46	0.52	5	0.01	55	0.04	70	0.04	21	0.34	54	0.12
Ferenczy 1958	78	0.40	87	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	62	0.04	88	0.03
Fliere 1977	4	0.63	21	0.00	5	0.11	3	0.55	21	0.46	6	0.50
Fou 1978	10	0.61	27	0.00	11	0.13	4	0.54	14	0.47	7	0.50
Francois 1956	66	0.44	79	0.00	58	0.05	53	0.05	36	0.25	60	0.11
Friedman 1923	73	0.42	60	0.00	76	0.05	64	0.05	20	0.37	50	0.14
Friedman 1923b	71	0.43	44	0.00	73	0.05	58	0.05	20	0.40	49	0.14
Friedman 1930	63	0.46	48	0.00	68	0.05	57	0.05	35	0.22	64	0.10
Garcia 2007	75	0.40	28	0.00	75	0.04	79	0.04	21	0.32	58	0.11
Garcia 2007b	72	0.42	76	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	20	0.34	57	0.12
Gierzod 1998	31	0.54	23	0.00	23	0.07	19	0.33	43	0.24	27	0.28
Gornostaeva 1994	47	0.51	11	0.01	57	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.15	69	0.09
Groot 1988	48	0.51	18	0.00	18	0.09	26	0.28	25	0.38	20	0.33
Harasiewicz 1955	14	0.58	67	0.00	26	0.05	29	0.25	50	0.06	56	0.12
Hatto 1993	35	0.54	56	0.00	31	0.05	25	0.28	21	0.24	31	0.26
Hatto 1997	29	0.54	83	0.00	32	0.06	27	0.27	27	0.27	28	0.27
Horowitz 1949	60	0.49	26	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	21	0.50	44	0.16
Indjic 1988	37	0.53	77	0.00	33	0.09	24	0.28	25	0.24	30	0.26
Kapell 1951	52	0.51	58	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.12	40	0.18	46	0.15
Kissin 1993	9	0.61	50	0.00	16	0.11	13	0.44	21	0.47	12	0.45
Kushner 1989	2	0.65	2	0.02	2	0.35	2	0.69	3	0.66	1	0.67
Luisada 1991	3	0.64	20	0.00	10	0.10	18	0.37	24	0.44	17	0.40
Lushtak 2004	19	0.57	10	0.01	34	0.07	32	0.22	37	0.18	40	0.20
Malcuzynski 1961	50	0.51	41	0.00	49	0.05	62	0.05	44	0.14	71	0.08
Magaloff 1978	56	0.50	73	0.00	56	0.04	68	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.04
Magin 1975	12	0.60	70	0.00	12	0.12	21	0.31	25	0.33	21	0.32
Michalowski 1933	69	0.43	69	0.00	69	0.06	51	0.06	37	0.25	55	0.12
Milkina 1970	22	0.56	7	0.01	7	0.11	10	0.48	16	0.47	11	0.47
Mohovich 1999	51	0.51	88	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.07	77	0.06
Moravec 1969	74	0.41	13	0.01	61	0.05	59	0.05	34	0.20	61	0.10
Morozova 2008	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Neighaus 1950	30	0.54	24	0.00	25	0.06	22	0.31	31	0.23	29	0.27
Niedzielski 1931	85	0.36	52	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	69	0.03	90	0.02
Ohlsson 1999	21	0.56	29	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.38	32	0.30	18	0.34
Osinska 1989	36	0.53	25	0.00	24	0.08	31	0.23	40	0.20	36	0.21
Pachmann 1927	83	0.37	84	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	55	0.06	82	0.04
Paderewski 1930	82	0.38	89	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.03	87	0.03
Perlemuter 1992	25	0.55	40	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.20	17	0.43	23	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008	68	0.43	74	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	31	0.24	62	0.10
Poblocka 1999	27	0.55	34	0.00	44	0.07	40	0.13	43	0.17	45	0.15
Rabcewiczowa 1932	54	0.50	57	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	28	0.25	53	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923	18	0.58	35	0.00	14	0.10	6	0.52	6	0.55	4	0.53
Rangell 2001	80	0.39	17	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.05	86	0.04
Richter 1976	28	0.55	46	0.00	29	0.04	45	0.10	26	0.37	41	0.19
Rosen 1989	33	0.54	37	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.31	26	0.33	22	0.32
Rosenthal 1930	70	0.43	43	0.00	65	0.04	77	0.04	30	0.31	59	0.11
Rosenthal 1931	77	0.40	65	0.00	77	0.04	67	0.04	19	0.53	47	0.15
Rosenthal 1931b	84	0.36	47	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	27	0.36	65	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c	76	0.40	38	0.00	80	0.04	76	0.04	38	0.23	66	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d	86	0.34	45	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	43	0.14	78	0.06
Rossi 2007	81	0.38	53	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	48	0.07	80	0.04
Rubinstein 1939	57	0.50	15	0.01	62	0.06	48	0.06	9	0.47	42	0.17
Rubinstein 1952	67	0.43	14	0.01	64	0.04	80	0.04	45	0.11	75	0.07
Rubinstein 1966	24	0.55	39	0.00	38	0.06	34	0.20	23	0.43	25	0.29
Schilhawsky 1960	43	0.53	64	0.00	50	0.05	56	0.05	42	0.17	67	0.09
Shebanova 2002	15	0.58	6	0.01	13	0.09	11	0.45	23	0.46	13	0.45
Smith 1975	38	0.53	68	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	52	0.07	76	0.06
Sokolov 2002	26	0.55	61	0.00	30	0.05	30	0.25	27	0.33	24	0.29
Sztompka 1959	11	0.61	8	0.01	17	0.09	12	0.44	16	0.43	14	0.43
Tomsic 1995	53	0.50	3	0.02	42	0.06	43	0.12	14	0.45	35	0.23
Uninsky 1932	20	0.57	78	0.00	37	0.05	36	0.18	20	0.44	26	0.28
Uninsky 1971	45	0.52	59	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.05	79	0.05
Wasowski 1980	34	0.54	42	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	24	0.31	51	0.12
Zak 1937	40	0.53	80	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.19	37	0.23	37	0.21
Zak 1951	32	0.54	82	0.00	35	0.06	28	0.27	41	0.21	34	0.24
Average	1	0.74	1	0.79	1	0.78	1	0.87	17	0.49	2	0.65
Random 1	91	-0.07	90	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	67	0.03	91	0.02
Random 2	89	0.00	85	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	12	0.41	68	0.09
Random 3	90	-0.04	91	0.00	90	0.02	90	0.02	54	0.04	89	0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).