Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	28	0.60	68	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.19	39	0.26	41	0.22
Anderszewski 2003	30	0.60	33	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.44	8	0.55	18	0.49
Ashkenazy 1981	12	0.64	5	0.01	8	0.12	6	0.63	8	0.58	7	0.60
Bacha 2000	56	0.52	14	0.00	63	0.06	59	0.06	20	0.42	50	0.16
Badura 1965	52	0.53	76	0.00	44	0.07	41	0.15	5	0.60	36	0.30
Barbosa 1983	68	0.48	88	0.00	61	0.05	66	0.05	44	0.10	70	0.07
Biret 1990	25	0.61	45	0.00	30	0.06	25	0.34	14	0.48	26	0.40
Blet 2003	54	0.52	91	0.00	64	0.06	55	0.06	45	0.10	68	0.08
Block 1995	42	0.56	30	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.23	6	0.56	28	0.36
Blumental 1952	62	0.51	32	0.00	47	0.05	70	0.05	13	0.35	60	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969	16	0.64	59	0.00	17	0.08	17	0.46	9	0.61	12	0.53
Brailowsky 1960	57	0.52	44	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	34	0.31	63	0.11
Bunin 1987	76	0.45	49	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	61	0.05	90	0.03
Bunin 1987b	79	0.44	77	0.00	82	0.02	88	0.02	61	0.05	88	0.03
Chiu 1999	58	0.51	54	0.00	62	0.06	57	0.06	31	0.33	57	0.14
Cohen 1997	86	0.38	36	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	37	0.23	69	0.08
Cortot 1951	71	0.47	80	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	48	0.07	81	0.05
Csalog 1996	65	0.49	74	0.00	65	0.05	60	0.05	18	0.48	55	0.15
Czerny 1949	36	0.58	71	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.24	33	0.28	39	0.26
Czerny 1990	3	0.70	11	0.01	4	0.24	4	0.63	5	0.71	4	0.67
Duchoud 2007	49	0.55	40	0.00	53	0.05	61	0.05	16	0.45	56	0.15
Ezaki 2006	24	0.61	38	0.00	28	0.07	36	0.20	39	0.20	43	0.20
Falvay 1989	14	0.64	12	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.41	6	0.62	16	0.50
Farrell 1958	51	0.54	16	0.00	49	0.05	63	0.05	9	0.47	53	0.15
Ferenczy 1958	83	0.42	70	0.00	88	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.04	84	0.04
Fliere 1977	4	0.70	24	0.00	5	0.20	5	0.63	12	0.57	6	0.60
Fou 1978	20	0.63	27	0.00	10	0.13	9	0.56	8	0.55	11	0.55
Francois 1956	44	0.56	67	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.26	19	0.49	29	0.36
Friedman 1923	87	0.37	62	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.05	87	0.04
Friedman 1923b	88	0.37	72	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	45	0.09	80	0.05
Friedman 1930	84	0.42	75	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	53	0.05	82	0.04
Garcia 2007	81	0.44	42	0.00	59	0.05	67	0.05	9	0.59	48	0.17
Garcia 2007b	80	0.44	39	0.00	58	0.06	58	0.06	4	0.60	45	0.19
Gierzod 1998	6	0.67	15	0.00	11	0.18	8	0.58	9	0.54	10	0.56
Gornostaeva 1994	9	0.65	25	0.00	14	0.12	20	0.44	15	0.54	19	0.49
Groot 1988	37	0.58	66	0.00	34	0.07	26	0.33	29	0.35	32	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955	45	0.56	8	0.01	18	0.09	22	0.40	35	0.24	35	0.31
Hatto 1993	67	0.49	41	0.00	57	0.10	46	0.10	63	0.05	71	0.07
Hatto 1997	69	0.48	56	0.00	60	0.05	68	0.05	64	0.04	83	0.04
Horowitz 1949	72	0.47	85	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	56	0.05	89	0.03
Indjic 1988	66	0.49	60	0.00	56	0.08	48	0.08	63	0.05	73	0.06
Kapell 1951	26	0.61	34	0.00	27	0.07	31	0.28	22	0.38	33	0.33
Kissin 1993	5	0.67	7	0.01	7	0.17	7	0.62	10	0.63	5	0.62
Kushner 1989	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991	23	0.61	37	0.00	29	0.06	24	0.34	17	0.50	22	0.41
Lushtak 2004	35	0.58	21	0.00	19	0.10	15	0.48	9	0.55	15	0.51
Malcuzynski 1961	17	0.63	18	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.38	13	0.46	21	0.42
Magaloff 1978	29	0.60	65	0.00	46	0.08	47	0.08	25	0.32	52	0.16
Magin 1975	11	0.64	2	0.04	6	0.16	11	0.53	5	0.63	8	0.58
Michalowski 1933	74	0.46	63	0.00	55	0.07	50	0.07	9	0.48	47	0.18
Milkina 1970	13	0.64	17	0.00	12	0.23	13	0.51	10	0.54	14	0.52
Mohovich 1999	27	0.60	28	0.00	31	0.05	27	0.33	22	0.48	25	0.40
Moravec 1969	47	0.56	61	0.00	37	0.06	45	0.11	17	0.39	42	0.21
Morozova 2008	7	0.65	6	0.01	3	0.16	3	0.66	2	0.69	3	0.67
Neighaus 1950	40	0.57	64	0.00	48	0.05	65	0.05	71	0.04	86	0.04
Niedzielski 1931	73	0.46	87	0.00	70	0.04	73	0.04	45	0.08	72	0.06
Ohlsson 1999	15	0.64	29	0.00	15	0.08	14	0.49	22	0.42	20	0.45
Osinska 1989	10	0.64	3	0.02	13	0.17	12	0.52	12	0.52	13	0.52
Pachmann 1927	82	0.43	58	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	34	0.22	67	0.08
Paderewski 1930	61	0.51	50	0.00	69	0.07	51	0.07	15	0.32	54	0.15
Perlemuter 1992	33	0.59	19	0.00	22	0.09	29	0.31	7	0.55	23	0.41
Pierdomenico 2008	50	0.54	53	0.00	41	0.04	44	0.13	2	0.63	37	0.29
Poblocka 1999	21	0.61	31	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.15	35	0.24	44	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932	46	0.56	81	0.00	38	0.06	39	0.17	16	0.40	38	0.26
Rachmaninoff 1923	64	0.49	90	0.00	54	0.06	56	0.06	67	0.04	75	0.05
Rangell 2001	39	0.57	13	0.00	20	0.11	32	0.26	3	0.59	27	0.39
Richter 1976	43	0.56	43	0.00	51	0.05	64	0.05	27	0.36	59	0.13
Rosen 1989	8	0.65	26	0.00	9	0.13	16	0.48	12	0.53	17	0.50
Rosenthal 1930	63	0.49	69	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	46	0.07	78	0.05
Rosenthal 1931	70	0.47	51	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	27	0.41	65	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b	75	0.46	82	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	26	0.38	62	0.12
Rosenthal 1931c	60	0.51	79	0.00	72	0.05	69	0.05	27	0.37	58	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d	77	0.45	52	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	25	0.32	66	0.10
Rossi 2007	85	0.41	73	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	12	0.45	61	0.12
Rubinstein 1939	78	0.45	57	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	17	0.40	64	0.11
Rubinstein 1952	48	0.55	35	0.00	52	0.06	53	0.06	20	0.49	49	0.17
Rubinstein 1966	19	0.63	10	0.01	16	0.08	10	0.53	12	0.62	9	0.57
Schilhawsky 1960	55	0.52	78	0.00	68	0.06	54	0.06	57	0.05	77	0.05
Shebanova 2002	2	0.71	4	0.02	2	0.28	2	0.71	3	0.72	1	0.71
Smith 1975	32	0.59	23	0.00	45	0.07	43	0.14	34	0.23	46	0.18
Sokolov 2002	22	0.61	9	0.01	26	0.08	28	0.32	21	0.39	30	0.35
Sztompka 1959	18	0.63	22	0.00	23	0.09	19	0.44	21	0.37	24	0.40
Tomsic 1995	38	0.58	20	0.00	42	0.05	38	0.18	11	0.56	34	0.32
Uninsky 1932	59	0.51	55	0.00	67	0.07	49	0.07	60	0.05	74	0.06
Uninsky 1971	53	0.53	46	0.00	66	0.05	62	0.05	52	0.06	76	0.05
Wasowski 1980	41	0.57	48	0.00	50	0.06	52	0.06	17	0.41	51	0.16
Zak 1937	34	0.59	47	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.16	28	0.35	40	0.24
Zak 1951	31	0.59	83	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.31	27	0.37	31	0.34
Average	1	0.80	1	0.78	1	0.77	1	0.90	7	0.55	2	0.70
Random 1	90	-0.02	89	0.00	89	0.01	90	0.01	22	0.29	79	0.05
Random 2	91	-0.07	84	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	82	0.02	91	0.01
Random 3	89	-0.01	86	0.00	90	0.01	89	0.01	34	0.13	85	0.04

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).