Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	21	0.59	18	0.00	25	0.11	23	0.45	26	0.38	24	0.41
Anderszewski 2003	22	0.58	17	0.00	27	0.12	25	0.41	15	0.48	21	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981	59	0.48	56	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	80	0.03	87	0.03
Bacha 2000	74	0.44	11	0.01	76	0.03	76	0.03	49	0.06	72	0.04
Badura 1965	66	0.46	71	0.00	65	0.05	49	0.05	39	0.24	50	0.11
Barbosa 1983	69	0.46	43	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.16	36	0.24	37	0.20
Biret 1990	23	0.58	33	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.33	33	0.24	32	0.28
Blet 2003	51	0.49	55	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.15	57	0.08
Block 1995	26	0.57	67	0.00	28	0.12	27	0.36	16	0.42	26	0.39
Blumental 1952	82	0.38	81	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.04	86	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969	11	0.64	31	0.00	9	0.08	20	0.50	14	0.50	14	0.50
Brailowsky 1960	38	0.55	63	0.00	53	0.05	46	0.05	32	0.33	46	0.13
Bunin 1987	56	0.48	32	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	37	0.18	58	0.08
Bunin 1987b	61	0.48	50	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	37	0.16	55	0.08
Chiu 1999	78	0.43	45	0.00	68	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.06	69	0.05
Cohen 1997	88	0.33	53	0.00	75	0.02	87	0.02	40	0.20	66	0.06
Cortot 1951	58	0.48	40	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	39	0.16	63	0.07
Csalog 1996	76	0.43	36	0.00	77	0.02	78	0.02	46	0.07	76	0.04
Czerny 1949	10	0.64	13	0.01	19	0.11	11	0.57	13	0.56	9	0.56
Czerny 1990	16	0.61	30	0.00	26	0.13	24	0.45	35	0.21	31	0.31
Duchoud 2007	57	0.48	34	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	33	0.23	49	0.11
Ezaki 2006	8	0.65	9	0.01	11	0.10	6	0.67	10	0.51	6	0.58
Falvay 1989	24	0.58	12	0.01	7	0.09	26	0.39	21	0.45	23	0.42
Farrell 1958	46	0.51	62	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.07	64	0.06
Ferenczy 1958	52	0.49	73	0.00	74	0.02	84	0.02	35	0.20	65	0.06
Fliere 1977	6	0.65	75	0.00	16	0.10	9	0.58	38	0.31	22	0.42
Fou 1978	31	0.56	38	0.00	20	0.12	16	0.54	27	0.38	19	0.45
Francois 1956	14	0.63	24	0.00	18	0.11	21	0.50	5	0.64	8	0.57
Friedman 1923	86	0.33	86	0.00	81	0.03	72	0.03	33	0.19	59	0.08
Friedman 1923b	87	0.33	83	0.00	80	0.02	81	0.02	37	0.16	67	0.06
Friedman 1930	68	0.46	65	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.15	24	0.36	36	0.23
Garcia 2007	83	0.38	74	0.00	79	0.02	88	0.02	55	0.06	85	0.03
Garcia 2007b	81	0.39	58	0.00	72	0.02	83	0.02	34	0.15	71	0.05
Gierzod 1998	12	0.63	59	0.00	13	0.08	7	0.61	32	0.38	18	0.48
Gornostaeva 1994	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Groot 1988	33	0.56	42	0.00	24	0.14	22	0.46	30	0.35	25	0.40
Harasiewicz 1955	27	0.57	22	0.00	10	0.11	17	0.54	32	0.27	27	0.38
Hatto 1993	85	0.34	91	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	88	0.03
Hatto 1997	79	0.39	82	0.00	67	0.03	70	0.03	78	0.04	84	0.03
Horowitz 1949	71	0.45	84	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	65	0.04	81	0.03
Indjic 1988	84	0.34	90	0.00	86	0.03	73	0.03	71	0.05	75	0.04
Kapell 1951	37	0.55	66	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.12	53	0.05	54	0.08
Kissin 1993	25	0.57	8	0.01	29	0.08	28	0.34	34	0.21	34	0.27
Kushner 1989	9	0.65	15	0.01	17	0.09	15	0.54	20	0.44	15	0.49
Luisada 1991	29	0.56	44	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.30	38	0.24	33	0.27
Lushtak 2004	60	0.48	68	0.00	56	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.04	79	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961	5	0.68	27	0.00	4	0.24	5	0.68	8	0.57	4	0.62
Magaloff 1978	7	0.65	10	0.01	12	0.07	8	0.60	3	0.55	7	0.57
Magin 1975	19	0.60	20	0.00	22	0.14	19	0.52	13	0.49	13	0.50
Michalowski 1933	77	0.43	89	0.00	66	0.03	69	0.03	45	0.15	61	0.07
Milkina 1970	15	0.61	35	0.00	14	0.09	12	0.57	25	0.41	17	0.48
Mohovich 1999	17	0.61	2	0.05	6	0.13	14	0.55	19	0.51	11	0.53
Moravec 1969	50	0.49	29	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.12	41	0.16	45	0.14
Morozova 2008	45	0.51	39	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.15	60	0.05	52	0.09
Neighaus 1950	13	0.63	14	0.01	8	0.09	13	0.56	18	0.43	16	0.49
Niedzielski 1931	65	0.46	52	0.00	83	0.02	79	0.02	80	0.03	89	0.02
Ohlsson 1999	28	0.56	19	0.00	33	0.08	39	0.18	70	0.04	56	0.08
Osinska 1989	2	0.69	3	0.02	5	0.29	4	0.71	6	0.65	3	0.68
Pachmann 1927	72	0.45	54	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	33	0.23	60	0.07
Paderewski 1930	63	0.47	51	0.00	73	0.02	86	0.02	46	0.06	83	0.03
Perlemuter 1992	41	0.53	28	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.29	23	0.37	30	0.33
Pierdomenico 2008	73	0.45	78	0.00	78	0.02	82	0.02	56	0.06	80	0.03
Poblocka 1999	34	0.55	69	0.00	64	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	68	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932	18	0.61	6	0.02	23	0.17	10	0.58	2	0.62	5	0.60
Rachmaninoff 1923	47	0.50	37	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.24	38	0.13	38	0.18
Rangell 2001	35	0.55	70	0.00	15	0.07	30	0.31	19	0.37	29	0.34
Richter 1976	75	0.44	87	0.00	88	0.04	61	0.04	77	0.03	82	0.03
Rosen 1989	3	0.69	4	0.02	2	0.35	2	0.77	4	0.72	2	0.74
Rosenthal 1930	32	0.56	48	0.00	34	0.07	36	0.22	7	0.63	28	0.37
Rosenthal 1931	49	0.49	80	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	10	0.65	39	0.18
Rosenthal 1931b	55	0.48	76	0.00	50	0.05	55	0.05	6	0.67	40	0.18
Rosenthal 1931c	36	0.55	64	0.00	31	0.08	33	0.29	7	0.69	20	0.45
Rosenthal 1931d	48	0.50	72	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	14	0.56	44	0.15
Rossi 2007	62	0.48	61	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	3	0.60	42	0.15
Rubinstein 1939	80	0.39	21	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	35	0.21	51	0.10
Rubinstein 1952	64	0.47	25	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.12	34	0.23	41	0.17
Rubinstein 1966	43	0.52	23	0.00	38	0.07	34	0.25	33	0.28	35	0.26
Schilhawsky 1960	70	0.46	60	0.00	87	0.04	68	0.04	76	0.04	77	0.04
Shebanova 2002	42	0.53	49	0.00	63	0.04	56	0.04	76	0.04	78	0.04
Smith 1975	4	0.68	5	0.02	3	0.28	3	0.76	2	0.75	1	0.75
Sokolov 2002	20	0.59	7	0.01	21	0.12	18	0.53	7	0.48	12	0.50
Sztompka 1959	30	0.56	26	0.00	35	0.06	38	0.18	41	0.13	43	0.15
Tomsic 1995	40	0.53	47	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	28	0.29	47	0.12
Uninsky 1932	67	0.46	79	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	50	0.07	70	0.05
Uninsky 1971	44	0.52	41	0.00	55	0.04	64	0.04	64	0.05	74	0.04
Wasowski 1980	39	0.53	16	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	44	0.12	53	0.08
Zak 1937	54	0.49	57	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04
Zak 1951	53	0.49	46	0.00	40	0.05	37	0.19	55	0.06	48	0.11
Average	1	0.76	1	0.73	1	0.72	1	0.88	34	0.34	10	0.55
Random 1	90	-0.03	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	46	0.05	91	0.02
Random 2	91	-0.07	88	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	59	0.04	90	0.02
Random 3	89	-0.01	85	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	30	0.22	62	0.07

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).