Zak 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		62	0.32	71	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	64	0.04	77	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		58	0.33	15	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.07	55	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.43	9	0.00	27	0.07	31	0.22	44	0.16	33	0.19
Bacha 2000		69	0.30	25	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	76	0.03	82	0.03
Badura 1965		72	0.29	72	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	38	0.15	50	0.09
Barbosa 1983		5	0.47	54	0.00	10	0.16	7	0.63	14	0.50	9	0.56
Biret 1990		9	0.46	73	0.00	6	0.25	8	0.63	6	0.69	5	0.66
Blet 2003		26	0.41	37	0.00	25	0.10	20	0.39	6	0.57	13	0.47
Block 1995		32	0.40	74	0.00	28	0.07	34	0.20	38	0.19	32	0.19
Blumental 1952		42	0.37	75	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	63	0.05	65	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		2	0.51	13	0.00	2	0.49	2	0.76	3	0.73	2	0.74
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.36	47	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	33	0.24	41	0.11
Bunin 1987		44	0.37	38	0.00	35	0.06	38	0.17	28	0.33	29	0.24
Bunin 1987b		49	0.36	55	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.15	28	0.37	28	0.24
Chiu 1999		7	0.46	32	0.00	16	0.15	14	0.50	17	0.47	12	0.48
Cohen 1997		81	0.22	56	0.00	81	0.04	80	0.04	77	0.03	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		85	0.19	39	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		15	0.44	57	0.00	12	0.17	12	0.52	7	0.53	11	0.52
Czerny 1949		75	0.26	76	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	64	0.05	76	0.04
Czerny 1990		53	0.34	40	0.00	60	0.04	77	0.04	81	0.04	79	0.04
Duchoud 2007		52	0.34	77	0.00	65	0.07	47	0.07	40	0.11	49	0.09
Ezaki 2006		50	0.36	58	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	67	0.05	60	0.05
Falvay 1989		6	0.47	21	0.00	15	0.15	13	0.51	34	0.26	18	0.36
Farrell 1958		55	0.33	29	0.00	22	0.10	30	0.27	25	0.33	24	0.30
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.29	26	0.00	73	0.04	83	0.04	36	0.36	40	0.12
Fliere 1977		12	0.44	10	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.39	55	0.06	36	0.15
Fou 1978		30	0.40	48	0.00	21	0.08	23	0.38	39	0.21	26	0.28
Francois 1956		79	0.23	78	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	56	0.04	81	0.04
Friedman 1923		17	0.43	16	0.00	14	0.18	10	0.60	4	0.73	6	0.66
Friedman 1923b		13	0.44	17	0.00	8	0.11	6	0.64	5	0.72	3	0.68
Friedman 1930		19	0.43	7	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.61	6	0.65	8	0.63
Garcia 2007		43	0.37	49	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.15	26	0.33	31	0.22
Garcia 2007b		56	0.33	41	0.00	54	0.05	61	0.05	64	0.05	68	0.05
Gierzod 1998		39	0.38	4	0.00	45	0.06	52	0.06	50	0.07	58	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		66	0.30	27	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	67	0.04	78	0.04
Groot 1988		60	0.33	79	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	59	0.04	66	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.50	5	0.00	4	0.25	4	0.68	20	0.46	10	0.56
Hatto 1993		31	0.40	2	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	60	0.05	51	0.08
Hatto 1997		38	0.38	59	0.00	49	0.07	49	0.07	48	0.05	56	0.06
Horowitz 1949		61	0.33	50	0.00	58	0.04	71	0.04	44	0.11	53	0.07
Indjic 1988		22	0.42	22	0.00	40	0.07	32	0.21	53	0.06	43	0.11
Kapell 1951		10	0.45	30	0.00	7	0.19	15	0.46	19	0.37	16	0.41
Kissin 1993		35	0.39	80	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.15	61	0.06	48	0.09
Kushner 1989		21	0.43	11	0.00	17	0.11	18	0.43	51	0.06	34	0.16
Luisada 1991		14	0.44	6	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.38	29	0.28	22	0.33
Lushtak 2004		8	0.46	31	0.00	5	0.25	5	0.65	7	0.63	7	0.64
Malcuzynski 1961		34	0.39	33	0.00	32	0.06	28	0.30	50	0.06	38	0.13
Magaloff 1978		59	0.33	3	0.00	67	0.08	45	0.08	71	0.03	62	0.05
Magin 1975		28	0.41	81	0.00	20	0.11	19	0.42	24	0.40	15	0.41
Michalowski 1933		68	0.30	60	0.00	59	0.05	63	0.05	9	0.50	35	0.16
Milkina 1970		64	0.31	82	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04	71	0.04
Mohovich 1999		16	0.44	83	0.00	18	0.13	25	0.35	31	0.37	20	0.36
Moravec 1969		67	0.30	61	0.00	72	0.03	87	0.03	72	0.04	83	0.03
Morozova 2008		71	0.29	51	0.00	64	0.05	62	0.05	69	0.04	75	0.04
Neighaus 1950		36	0.39	28	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	34	0.24	37	0.15
Niedzielski 1931		51	0.35	34	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.15	28	0.32	30	0.22
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.41	62	0.00	19	0.10	17	0.45	30	0.29	19	0.36
Osinska 1989		3	0.50	18	0.00	3	0.26	3	0.71	11	0.62	4	0.66
Pachmann 1927		33	0.39	63	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.18	12	0.53	23	0.31
Paderewski 1930		84	0.21	64	0.00	79	0.05	57	0.05	64	0.04	73	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		63	0.32	35	0.00	63	0.04	75	0.04	51	0.06	61	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		54	0.34	14	0.00	71	0.04	66	0.04	43	0.11	52	0.07
Poblocka 1999		25	0.41	23	0.00	29	0.06	29	0.30	39	0.25	27	0.27
Rabcewiczowa 1932		77	0.24	84	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.03	84	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		57	0.33	65	0.00	66	0.07	48	0.07	52	0.05	54	0.06
Rangell 2001		23	0.42	66	0.00	30	0.06	27	0.31	22	0.48	17	0.39
Richter 1976		37	0.38	67	0.00	50	0.05	60	0.05	58	0.06	63	0.05
Rosen 1989		24	0.41	8	0.00	31	0.06	26	0.32	48	0.05	39	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		86	0.18	85	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.17	68	0.00	85	0.04	82	0.04	51	0.06	64	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.23	86	0.00	83	0.05	65	0.05	47	0.06	67	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.22	24	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.22	87	0.00	82	0.04	79	0.04	56	0.05	80	0.04
Rossi 2007		80	0.22	42	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	28	0.33	42	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.26	52	0.00	69	0.05	64	0.05	83	0.03	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.37	88	0.00	36	0.05	37	0.18	55	0.06	47	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.45	43	0.00	13	0.18	11	0.57	34	0.21	21	0.35
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.40	19	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.35	8	0.57	14	0.45
Shebanova 2002		18	0.43	69	0.00	9	0.13	16	0.46	41	0.19	25	0.30
Smith 1975		76	0.25	53	0.00	80	0.04	81	0.04	75	0.04	69	0.04
Sokolov 2002		47	0.36	44	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	38	0.18	45	0.10
Sztompka 1959		73	0.28	89	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	72	0.04	74	0.04
Tomsic 1995		65	0.31	12	0.00	57	0.04	72	0.04	77	0.04	72	0.04
Uninsky 1932		46	0.37	70	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	57	0.05	57	0.06
Uninsky 1971		40	0.37	20	0.00	33	0.06	35	0.19	58	0.05	46	0.10
Wasowski 1980		45	0.37	36	0.00	34	0.07	33	0.21	70	0.05	44	0.10
Zak 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1951		1	0.97	1	1.00	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Random 1		89	-0.04	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	66	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.06	45	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.03	46	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	35	0.19	59	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).