Wasowski 1980

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		70	0.31	89	0.00	69	0.04	82	0.04	37	0.18	62	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		68	0.31	88	0.00	71	0.06	51	0.06	59	0.05	72	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.37	75	0.00	65	0.05	55	0.05	63	0.06	76	0.05
Bacha 2000		83	0.16	77	0.00	84	0.05	69	0.05	85	0.02	83	0.03
Badura 1965		75	0.30	45	0.00	68	0.04	83	0.04	33	0.17	63	0.08
Barbosa 1983		25	0.45	6	0.04	8	0.11	16	0.53	12	0.53	16	0.53
Biret 1990		14	0.48	1	0.23	1	0.23	5	0.62	3	0.75	2	0.68
Blet 2003		24	0.45	17	0.01	22	0.09	28	0.39	5	0.59	24	0.48
Block 1995		53	0.37	60	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.09	53	0.06	64	0.07
Blumental 1952		65	0.34	40	0.00	58	0.05	62	0.05	52	0.06	75	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.40	46	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.38	35	0.25	32	0.31
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.26	79	0.00	78	0.04	77	0.04	75	0.04	78	0.04
Bunin 1987		39	0.40	52	0.00	46	0.05	76	0.05	22	0.41	48	0.14
Bunin 1987b		42	0.40	42	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.10	18	0.44	40	0.21
Chiu 1999		19	0.46	16	0.01	17	0.10	13	0.55	3	0.65	8	0.60
Cohen 1997		63	0.34	13	0.01	53	0.04	78	0.04	38	0.24	57	0.10
Cortot 1951		76	0.27	26	0.00	67	0.05	56	0.05	37	0.19	58	0.10
Csalog 1996		27	0.44	34	0.00	25	0.08	22	0.49	4	0.58	17	0.53
Czerny 1949		58	0.36	80	0.00	61	0.06	53	0.06	32	0.44	43	0.16
Czerny 1990		3	0.53	8	0.03	6	0.11	7	0.61	20	0.64	7	0.62
Duchoud 2007		50	0.38	23	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.11	13	0.48	37	0.23
Ezaki 2006		74	0.30	73	0.00	75	0.05	65	0.05	64	0.05	68	0.05
Falvay 1989		28	0.44	50	0.00	26	0.09	21	0.49	20	0.39	27	0.44
Farrell 1958		45	0.39	59	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.13	16	0.44	36	0.24
Ferenczy 1958		84	0.15	84	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.04	84	0.03
Fliere 1977		5	0.50	12	0.01	14	0.11	6	0.62	27	0.39	21	0.49
Fou 1978		47	0.38	51	0.00	45	0.05	60	0.05	65	0.04	79	0.04
Francois 1956		72	0.30	86	0.00	77	0.06	47	0.06	50	0.05	77	0.05
Friedman 1923		31	0.42	14	0.01	24	0.08	26	0.41	5	0.70	15	0.54
Friedman 1923b		29	0.44	9	0.02	21	0.10	23	0.48	4	0.72	10	0.59
Friedman 1930		10	0.49	4	0.10	4	0.19	1	0.68	3	0.78	1	0.73
Garcia 2007		73	0.30	74	0.00	72	0.05	68	0.05	61	0.05	74	0.05
Garcia 2007b		32	0.42	38	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.10	19	0.49	39	0.22
Gierzod 1998		80	0.24	72	0.00	73	0.05	63	0.05	55	0.06	73	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.40	39	0.00	37	0.05	35	0.21	29	0.37	34	0.28
Groot 1988		13	0.48	43	0.00	18	0.11	10	0.56	10	0.54	14	0.55
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.48	29	0.00	19	0.11	17	0.52	34	0.30	30	0.39
Hatto 1993		12	0.48	69	0.00	12	0.16	19	0.50	18	0.48	22	0.49
Hatto 1997		17	0.47	20	0.01	15	0.09	14	0.53	15	0.52	19	0.52
Horowitz 1949		30	0.42	18	0.01	36	0.06	38	0.16	12	0.57	33	0.30
Indjic 1988		9	0.49	24	0.00	9	0.15	12	0.55	16	0.56	13	0.55
Kapell 1951		2	0.53	3	0.11	3	0.19	4	0.63	6	0.56	9	0.59
Kissin 1993		16	0.47	22	0.00	10	0.13	20	0.50	13	0.65	12	0.57
Kushner 1989		26	0.44	64	0.00	33	0.11	30	0.38	70	0.04	50	0.12
Luisada 1991		4	0.52	5	0.07	5	0.20	3	0.65	4	0.70	3	0.67
Lushtak 2004		61	0.35	48	0.00	62	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.07	66	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.40	62	0.00	54	0.04	80	0.04	59	0.05	80	0.04
Magaloff 1978		34	0.41	55	0.00	35	0.06	36	0.20	36	0.19	41	0.19
Magin 1975		20	0.46	15	0.01	31	0.12	31	0.37	17	0.51	28	0.43
Michalowski 1933		67	0.31	66	0.00	76	0.06	49	0.06	35	0.22	54	0.11
Milkina 1970		37	0.41	44	0.00	28	0.09	24	0.46	23	0.49	25	0.47
Mohovich 1999		79	0.25	71	0.00	80	0.06	46	0.06	86	0.03	82	0.04
Moravec 1969		18	0.46	33	0.00	32	0.14	27	0.41	12	0.47	26	0.44
Morozova 2008		56	0.37	56	0.00	40	0.04	40	0.12	45	0.06	61	0.08
Neighaus 1950		23	0.45	27	0.00	23	0.08	32	0.36	9	0.51	29	0.43
Niedzielski 1931		57	0.36	25	0.00	60	0.05	72	0.05	32	0.25	53	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		7	0.50	21	0.00	7	0.11	2	0.66	1	0.69	4	0.67
Osinska 1989		15	0.48	11	0.01	13	0.12	11	0.56	14	0.59	11	0.57
Pachmann 1927		64	0.34	61	0.00	66	0.04	79	0.04	29	0.35	52	0.12
Paderewski 1930		69	0.31	32	0.00	52	0.06	50	0.06	26	0.43	42	0.16
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.38	68	0.00	63	0.05	54	0.05	30	0.28	49	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		46	0.39	37	0.00	49	0.05	71	0.05	17	0.48	44	0.15
Poblocka 1999		22	0.45	57	0.00	30	0.11	25	0.46	19	0.51	23	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		71	0.31	76	0.00	70	0.05	74	0.05	56	0.06	70	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		33	0.41	10	0.02	27	0.09	34	0.31	24	0.38	31	0.34
Rangell 2001		41	0.40	58	0.00	47	0.05	67	0.05	24	0.47	45	0.15
Richter 1976		8	0.49	36	0.00	16	0.12	9	0.59	12	0.65	6	0.62
Rosen 1989		35	0.41	19	0.01	34	0.11	33	0.36	30	0.21	35	0.27
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.26	81	0.00	81	0.05	64	0.05	64	0.04	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.09	85	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		87	0.07	90	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.20	83	0.00	82	0.04	81	0.04	80	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.11	87	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		81	0.21	53	0.00	79	0.05	58	0.05	39	0.20	55	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.37	49	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.18	27	0.26	38	0.22
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.41	54	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	51	0.07	67	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.38	41	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	55	0.07	65	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		62	0.35	47	0.00	64	0.07	45	0.07	28	0.30	47	0.14
Shebanova 2002		6	0.50	7	0.03	11	0.14	15	0.53	20	0.50	20	0.51
Smith 1975		49	0.38	30	0.00	56	0.05	66	0.05	28	0.37	46	0.14
Sokolov 2002		66	0.33	35	0.00	74	0.05	75	0.05	56	0.05	69	0.05
Sztompka 1959		1	0.53	2	0.20	2	0.20	8	0.60	7	0.67	5	0.63
Tomsic 1995		43	0.40	31	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	28	0.26	51	0.12
Uninsky 1932		21	0.45	28	0.00	20	0.09	18	0.51	13	0.56	18	0.53
Uninsky 1971		59	0.36	63	0.00	51	0.05	73	0.05	53	0.06	71	0.05
Wasowski 1980		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1937		55	0.37	70	0.00	55	0.05	70	0.05	33	0.21	56	0.10
Zak 1951		60	0.35	65	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.15	59	0.09
Random 1		89	-0.04	78	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	71	0.02	87	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.04	67	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.00	82	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	9	0.45	60	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).