Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.46	77	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.42	4	0.64	13	0.52
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.42	64	0.00	28	0.12	25	0.41	24	0.48	24	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.36	62	0.00	65	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.09	63	0.07
Bacha 2000		46	0.38	14	0.01	25	0.09	32	0.33	7	0.64	20	0.46
Badura 1965		61	0.36	39	0.00	48	0.08	45	0.08	12	0.50	43	0.20
Barbosa 1983		22	0.44	8	0.03	20	0.09	23	0.42	24	0.38	27	0.40
Biret 1990		24	0.43	50	0.00	30	0.11	29	0.35	17	0.57	21	0.45
Blet 2003		66	0.34	51	0.00	69	0.06	56	0.06	48	0.06	65	0.06
Block 1995		57	0.36	40	0.00	52	0.05	62	0.05	41	0.15	60	0.09
Blumental 1952		6	0.47	11	0.02	5	0.14	5	0.66	3	0.75	2	0.70
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.37	5	0.05	15	0.09	33	0.32	37	0.22	36	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		14	0.46	29	0.00	13	0.10	9	0.58	5	0.73	5	0.65
Bunin 1987		72	0.29	52	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.05	79	0.04
Bunin 1987b		71	0.29	31	0.00	70	0.03	77	0.03	53	0.05	77	0.04
Chiu 1999		59	0.36	56	0.00	63	0.05	63	0.05	46	0.06	70	0.05
Cohen 1997		40	0.40	43	0.00	45	0.05	61	0.05	5	0.68	46	0.18
Cortot 1951		51	0.38	79	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	4	0.69	44	0.20
Csalog 1996		69	0.30	46	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	66	0.05	86	0.03
Czerny 1949		12	0.46	34	0.00	12	0.09	14	0.52	10	0.74	7	0.62
Czerny 1990		34	0.41	38	0.00	29	0.13	27	0.38	32	0.41	29	0.39
Duchoud 2007		80	0.27	69	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	57	0.06	87	0.03
Ezaki 2006		2	0.51	9	0.02	8	0.20	4	0.66	2	0.72	3	0.69
Falvay 1989		16	0.46	16	0.01	22	0.08	19	0.46	18	0.41	25	0.43
Farrell 1958		67	0.33	42	0.00	57	0.05	64	0.05	41	0.14	61	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.38	55	0.00	60	0.06	48	0.06	18	0.66	42	0.20
Fliere 1977		18	0.44	15	0.01	21	0.10	16	0.50	47	0.08	41	0.20
Fou 1978		32	0.41	6	0.03	24	0.08	20	0.45	22	0.44	22	0.44
Francois 1956		43	0.39	54	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	16	0.59	45	0.19
Friedman 1923		74	0.28	85	0.00	78	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.04	82	0.04
Friedman 1923b		77	0.27	88	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.05	80	0.04
Friedman 1930		76	0.28	78	0.00	76	0.05	66	0.05	64	0.05	73	0.05
Garcia 2007		87	0.20	90	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	62	0.05	88	0.03
Garcia 2007b		75	0.28	45	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.05	81	0.04
Gierzod 1998		13	0.46	7	0.03	6	0.17	6	0.66	6	0.65	6	0.65
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.47	17	0.01	18	0.08	13	0.52	7	0.65	9	0.58
Groot 1988		15	0.46	12	0.02	7	0.21	7	0.61	7	0.56	10	0.58
Harasiewicz 1955		3	0.51	4	0.07	3	0.19	3	0.68	14	0.54	8	0.61
Hatto 1993		20	0.44	33	0.00	10	0.11	10	0.55	22	0.40	19	0.47
Hatto 1997		1	0.51	1	0.29	1	0.28	2	0.69	3	0.70	4	0.69
Horowitz 1949		84	0.24	66	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Indjic 1988		21	0.44	28	0.00	11	0.12	15	0.51	23	0.44	17	0.47
Kapell 1951		36	0.40	23	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.19	44	0.09	51	0.13
Kissin 1993		47	0.38	74	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.20	35	0.40	34	0.28
Kushner 1989		39	0.40	44	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.16	49	0.07	53	0.11
Luisada 1991		50	0.38	76	0.00	61	0.04	72	0.04	54	0.06	67	0.05
Lushtak 2004		58	0.36	49	0.00	64	0.07	47	0.07	55	0.05	66	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		33	0.41	61	0.00	33	0.11	30	0.35	42	0.14	39	0.22
Magaloff 1978		31	0.42	10	0.02	23	0.08	28	0.35	18	0.41	30	0.38
Magin 1975		54	0.37	82	0.00	62	0.04	70	0.04	45	0.07	71	0.05
Michalowski 1933		83	0.24	60	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	67	0.05	78	0.04
Milkina 1970		5	0.48	3	0.11	4	0.19	11	0.53	21	0.53	12	0.53
Mohovich 1999		26	0.43	30	0.00	32	0.10	26	0.39	29	0.41	28	0.40
Moravec 1969		41	0.39	24	0.00	34	0.07	36	0.23	35	0.24	37	0.23
Morozova 2008		38	0.40	47	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	40	0.17	50	0.15
Neighaus 1950		35	0.41	65	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.21	25	0.37	35	0.28
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.27	81	0.00	68	0.04	73	0.04	63	0.04	76	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.43	32	0.00	26	0.10	21	0.45	13	0.44	23	0.44
Osinska 1989		8	0.47	19	0.00	14	0.11	12	0.53	22	0.49	14	0.51
Pachmann 1927		86	0.23	83	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.04	85	0.03
Paderewski 1930		85	0.24	63	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	49	0.06	72	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.39	36	0.00	50	0.06	55	0.06	17	0.47	48	0.17
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.25	89	0.00	87	0.04	74	0.04	75	0.03	83	0.03
Poblocka 1999		27	0.42	70	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.18	38	0.27	38	0.22
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.42	25	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.35	19	0.53	26	0.43
Rachmaninoff 1923		64	0.35	27	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	43	0.13	58	0.09
Rangell 2001		65	0.34	80	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	36	0.27	52	0.12
Richter 1976		49	0.38	48	0.00	58	0.07	46	0.07	64	0.05	64	0.06
Rosen 1989		17	0.45	59	0.00	16	0.10	17	0.49	12	0.45	18	0.47
Rosenthal 1930		55	0.37	68	0.00	56	0.04	68	0.04	12	0.62	49	0.16
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.29	67	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	29	0.42	54	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		70	0.30	84	0.00	66	0.06	54	0.06	21	0.52	47	0.18
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.30	41	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	39	0.18	62	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.27	37	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	21	0.41	55	0.11
Rossi 2007		81	0.26	71	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	44	0.14	69	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		25	0.43	20	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.23	24	0.37	33	0.29
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.44	53	0.00	19	0.09	18	0.48	19	0.53	16	0.50
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.47	58	0.00	9	0.09	8	0.58	21	0.43	15	0.50
Schilhawsky 1960		60	0.36	22	0.00	67	0.05	65	0.05	35	0.16	59	0.09
Shebanova 2002		42	0.39	35	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	65	0.06	74	0.05
Smith 1975		11	0.46	26	0.00	17	0.08	22	0.43	5	0.67	11	0.54
Sokolov 2002		28	0.42	13	0.01	39	0.07	40	0.19	13	0.50	31	0.31
Sztompka 1959		37	0.40	75	0.00	37	0.06	34	0.26	27	0.38	32	0.31
Tomsic 1995		45	0.39	18	0.01	43	0.06	43	0.14	24	0.34	40	0.22
Uninsky 1932		4	0.50	2	0.16	2	0.21	1	0.70	1	0.74	1	0.72
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		63	0.36	21	0.00	47	0.06	53	0.06	73	0.05	68	0.05
Zak 1937		53	0.37	73	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	35	0.19	56	0.10
Zak 1951		52	0.37	57	0.00	54	0.06	57	0.06	38	0.18	57	0.10
Random 1		89	-0.02	72	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	59	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.02	86	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	40	0.13	75	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.07	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	59	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).