Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		61	0.35	58	0.00	65	0.06	61	0.06	41	0.14	59	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		68	0.31	64	0.00	64	0.06	57	0.06	53	0.07	66	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.60	3	0.12	5	0.34	3	0.78	1	0.85	2	0.81
Bacha 2000		60	0.35	79	0.00	66	0.06	54	0.06	23	0.32	55	0.14
Badura 1965		62	0.34	76	0.00	60	0.08	46	0.08	19	0.40	47	0.18
Barbosa 1983		33	0.44	41	0.00	38	0.08	33	0.33	27	0.35	37	0.34
Biret 1990		67	0.32	45	0.00	70	0.06	60	0.06	53	0.05	75	0.05
Blet 2003		57	0.37	38	0.00	56	0.07	51	0.07	30	0.35	50	0.16
Block 1995		18	0.48	32	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.57	4	0.71	11	0.64
Blumental 1952		41	0.42	25	0.00	31	0.10	31	0.34	18	0.50	31	0.41
Boshniakovich 1969		24	0.46	33	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.35	26	0.35	35	0.35
Brailowsky 1960		78	0.25	60	0.00	76	0.06	63	0.06	69	0.05	68	0.05
Bunin 1987		40	0.43	37	0.00	24	0.10	27	0.40	3	0.65	25	0.51
Bunin 1987b		46	0.41	46	0.00	30	0.10	32	0.34	5	0.59	28	0.45
Chiu 1999		7	0.54	17	0.01	8	0.22	6	0.69	1	0.77	5	0.73
Cohen 1997		73	0.29	71	0.00	78	0.05	77	0.05	54	0.05	74	0.05
Cortot 1951		76	0.26	31	0.00	77	0.04	82	0.04	59	0.06	76	0.05
Csalog 1996		54	0.39	86	0.00	53	0.06	68	0.06	21	0.34	56	0.14
Czerny 1949		83	0.19	39	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03
Czerny 1990		5	0.55	19	0.00	9	0.17	8	0.68	8	0.75	8	0.71
Duchoud 2007		30	0.44	16	0.01	28	0.08	25	0.45	3	0.72	17	0.57
Ezaki 2006		63	0.34	47	0.00	67	0.06	67	0.06	50	0.08	62	0.07
Falvay 1989		23	0.46	52	0.00	39	0.08	35	0.31	33	0.29	39	0.30
Farrell 1958		74	0.29	61	0.00	72	0.06	66	0.06	59	0.06	65	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		84	0.18	83	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	69	0.04	83	0.03
Fliere 1977		4	0.58	7	0.06	4	0.22	2	0.79	3	0.75	3	0.77
Fou 1978		34	0.44	84	0.00	40	0.08	37	0.28	30	0.33	40	0.30
Francois 1956		81	0.23	80	0.00	80	0.04	79	0.04	81	0.03	88	0.03
Friedman 1923		28	0.45	13	0.01	22	0.10	22	0.48	6	0.69	14	0.58
Friedman 1923b		32	0.44	15	0.01	21	0.09	23	0.46	11	0.62	22	0.53
Friedman 1930		10	0.53	5	0.07	7	0.26	9	0.66	4	0.72	9	0.69
Garcia 2007		59	0.36	55	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.16	14	0.49	42	0.28
Garcia 2007b		39	0.43	50	0.00	32	0.08	29	0.37	8	0.67	26	0.50
Gierzod 1998		49	0.41	72	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.24	29	0.29	43	0.26
Gornostaeva 1994		69	0.30	57	0.00	75	0.06	55	0.06	70	0.03	80	0.04
Groot 1988		14	0.49	10	0.02	10	0.17	15	0.53	4	0.60	19	0.56
Harasiewicz 1955		36	0.44	74	0.00	49	0.05	74	0.05	54	0.06	77	0.05
Hatto 1993		6	0.55	2	0.16	2	0.16	5	0.70	3	0.75	6	0.72
Hatto 1997		48	0.41	65	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.38	21	0.45	30	0.41
Horowitz 1949		52	0.39	43	0.00	58	0.06	56	0.06	14	0.55	46	0.18
Indjic 1988		9	0.54	6	0.07	3	0.18	7	0.68	4	0.74	7	0.71
Kapell 1951		35	0.44	27	0.00	45	0.06	58	0.06	46	0.08	63	0.07
Kissin 1993		3	0.60	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.79	1	0.87	1	0.83
Kushner 1989		1	0.61	4	0.09	6	0.39	4	0.77	1	0.76	4	0.76
Luisada 1991		22	0.47	12	0.01	25	0.09	19	0.51	10	0.57	21	0.54
Lushtak 2004		21	0.47	66	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.48	6	0.65	18	0.56
Malcuzynski 1961		16	0.49	8	0.02	16	0.09	18	0.52	12	0.53	23	0.52
Magaloff 1978		15	0.49	24	0.00	18	0.11	17	0.52	5	0.63	15	0.57
Magin 1975		17	0.49	28	0.00	20	0.09	16	0.52	8	0.66	13	0.59
Michalowski 1933		72	0.29	81	0.00	62	0.06	64	0.06	27	0.36	53	0.15
Milkina 1970		71	0.30	62	0.00	68	0.05	73	0.05	58	0.05	72	0.05
Mohovich 1999		56	0.37	51	0.00	59	0.09	45	0.09	40	0.10	60	0.09
Moravec 1969		42	0.42	26	0.00	51	0.05	72	0.05	34	0.26	57	0.11
Morozova 2008		19	0.48	23	0.00	17	0.12	24	0.45	18	0.50	27	0.47
Neighaus 1950		37	0.43	42	0.00	46	0.07	53	0.07	20	0.42	49	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		50	0.40	59	0.00	33	0.06	40	0.22	4	0.61	34	0.37
Ohlsson 1999		12	0.50	9	0.02	12	0.14	14	0.54	4	0.61	16	0.57
Osinska 1989		55	0.38	30	0.00	57	0.05	70	0.05	55	0.05	67	0.05
Pachmann 1927		47	0.41	35	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	11	0.55	45	0.20
Paderewski 1930		66	0.32	77	0.00	63	0.07	50	0.07	27	0.43	48	0.17
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.45	11	0.02	27	0.09	34	0.31	5	0.62	29	0.44
Pierdomenico 2008		31	0.44	63	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.17	2	0.69	36	0.34
Poblocka 1999		26	0.46	29	0.00	34	0.07	36	0.29	24	0.46	33	0.37
Rabcewiczowa 1932		75	0.28	48	0.00	73	0.05	76	0.05	65	0.05	71	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		64	0.34	73	0.00	61	0.08	47	0.08	46	0.08	61	0.08
Rangell 2001		45	0.42	82	0.00	52	0.06	62	0.06	26	0.45	51	0.16
Richter 1976		8	0.54	14	0.01	11	0.14	10	0.60	8	0.71	10	0.65
Rosen 1989		20	0.47	36	0.00	19	0.08	12	0.54	7	0.56	20	0.55
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.22	88	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	75	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.15	87	0.00	85	0.04	83	0.04	81	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.17	78	0.00	84	0.04	81	0.04	66	0.04	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.26	75	0.00	74	0.06	69	0.06	62	0.04	78	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.13	90	0.00	86	0.03	87	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		80	0.23	49	0.00	81	0.04	80	0.04	52	0.06	70	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		70	0.30	68	0.00	69	0.07	52	0.07	53	0.05	64	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		44	0.42	67	0.00	50	0.05	75	0.05	39	0.21	58	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.46	56	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.44	32	0.23	38	0.32
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.37	18	0.01	55	0.06	59	0.06	19	0.38	54	0.15
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		79	0.24	85	0.00	79	0.04	78	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.04
Sokolov 2002		65	0.32	21	0.00	71	0.05	71	0.05	58	0.05	69	0.05
Sztompka 1959		11	0.52	34	0.00	14	0.10	13	0.54	9	0.67	12	0.60
Tomsic 1995		43	0.42	44	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	19	0.40	44	0.24
Uninsky 1932		27	0.45	54	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.27	16	0.53	32	0.38
Uninsky 1971		53	0.39	20	0.00	48	0.06	65	0.06	59	0.05	73	0.05
Wasowski 1980		13	0.50	22	0.00	15	0.11	20	0.50	15	0.53	24	0.51
Zak 1937		38	0.43	40	0.00	35	0.07	41	0.19	16	0.46	41	0.30
Zak 1951		51	0.40	53	0.00	54	0.07	48	0.07	24	0.34	52	0.15
Random 1		89	-0.03	69	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	45	0.05	86	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.01	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	76	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.05	70	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).