Rossi 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		65	0.16	56	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		74	0.12	78	0.00	66	0.05	57	0.05	76	0.03	58	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		67	0.15	45	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	87	0.03	72	0.03
Bacha 2000		69	0.15	72	0.00	81	0.02	77	0.02	81	0.03	78	0.02
Badura 1965		81	0.08	31	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	69	0.03	69	0.03
Barbosa 1983		80	0.09	79	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.02	84	0.02
Biret 1990		15	0.28	36	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.24	80	0.03	41	0.08
Blet 2003		62	0.17	38	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	86	0.02	66	0.03
Block 1995		41	0.22	27	0.00	31	0.07	33	0.26	79	0.03	37	0.09
Blumental 1952		84	0.06	84	0.00	85	0.02	79	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		13	0.28	59	0.00	22	0.07	25	0.34	83	0.04	24	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		87	0.04	55	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.02	89	0.01
Bunin 1987		53	0.19	81	0.00	53	0.04	65	0.04	85	0.03	73	0.03
Bunin 1987b		52	0.19	80	0.00	52	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04	56	0.04
Chiu 1999		27	0.25	26	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	81	0.03	47	0.05
Cohen 1997		16	0.28	22	0.00	23	0.07	30	0.30	58	0.04	29	0.11
Cortot 1951		35	0.23	44	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.24	65	0.05	30	0.11
Csalog 1996		4	0.36	8	0.02	3	0.20	2	0.69	33	0.16	2	0.33
Czerny 1949		11	0.30	21	0.01	26	0.07	22	0.37	62	0.05	16	0.14
Czerny 1990		72	0.14	77	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03
Duchoud 2007		44	0.22	53	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.22	70	0.04	36	0.09
Ezaki 2006		40	0.22	54	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	79	0.04	52	0.04
Falvay 1989		45	0.21	23	0.00	20	0.07	34	0.25	81	0.03	35	0.09
Farrell 1958		46	0.21	2	0.08	5	0.12	11	0.48	38	0.15	5	0.27
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.14	66	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	68	0.03
Fliere 1977		9	0.32	14	0.01	7	0.11	6	0.60	79	0.04	13	0.15
Fou 1978		50	0.20	70	0.00	62	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.04	54	0.04
Francois 1956		32	0.24	19	0.01	47	0.07	45	0.07	71	0.03	51	0.05
Friedman 1923		55	0.18	69	0.00	56	0.05	59	0.05	86	0.03	63	0.04
Friedman 1923b		57	0.18	49	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	83	0.03	61	0.04
Friedman 1930		58	0.18	75	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	84	0.03	60	0.04
Garcia 2007		22	0.25	15	0.01	8	0.15	7	0.59	64	0.05	10	0.17
Garcia 2007b		24	0.25	25	0.00	34	0.07	24	0.35	47	0.06	18	0.14
Gierzod 1998		29	0.24	30	0.00	24	0.07	26	0.34	72	0.04	23	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		2	0.39	4	0.04	4	0.13	3	0.65	48	0.07	8	0.21
Groot 1988		64	0.16	85	0.00	68	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.03	76	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.24	76	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.29	82	0.03	38	0.09
Hatto 1993		82	0.08	90	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02
Hatto 1997		76	0.10	89	0.00	82	0.02	81	0.02	87	0.03	85	0.02
Horowitz 1949		85	0.05	57	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	82	0.02
Indjic 1988		83	0.06	86	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	88	0.02	83	0.02
Kapell 1951		56	0.18	52	0.00	54	0.04	64	0.04	81	0.03	65	0.03
Kissin 1993		36	0.23	50	0.00	16	0.08	10	0.50	69	0.05	12	0.16
Kushner 1989		26	0.25	60	0.00	32	0.07	27	0.33	87	0.03	32	0.10
Luisada 1991		71	0.14	68	0.00	76	0.02	78	0.02	85	0.03	80	0.02
Lushtak 2004		21	0.25	20	0.01	18	0.09	12	0.48	68	0.04	17	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.25	33	0.00	14	0.11	9	0.57	63	0.05	9	0.17
Magaloff 1978		3	0.36	3	0.06	2	0.21	5	0.61	61	0.04	11	0.16
Magin 1975		18	0.26	18	0.01	25	0.07	19	0.39	65	0.04	20	0.12
Michalowski 1933		47	0.21	63	0.00	51	0.04	66	0.04	54	0.06	48	0.05
Milkina 1970		60	0.17	62	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	87	0.02	55	0.04
Mohovich 1999		51	0.20	67	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	84	0.03	71	0.03
Moravec 1969		73	0.13	87	0.00	74	0.03	72	0.03	88	0.02	79	0.02
Morozova 2008		61	0.17	41	0.00	67	0.05	58	0.05	82	0.03	59	0.04
Neighaus 1950		38	0.22	24	0.00	38	0.06	40	0.20	83	0.03	42	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		66	0.16	9	0.02	21	0.07	42	0.17	65	0.04	39	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.26	43	0.00	29	0.07	23	0.36	86	0.03	33	0.10
Osinska 1989		1	0.45	1	0.54	1	0.53	1	0.85	35	0.25	1	0.46
Pachmann 1927		10	0.31	13	0.01	12	0.15	18	0.41	38	0.17	7	0.26
Paderewski 1930		20	0.26	10	0.02	13	0.12	16	0.44	43	0.17	6	0.27
Perlemuter 1992		7	0.32	7	0.02	6	0.10	4	0.64	40	0.14	3	0.30
Pierdomenico 2008		6	0.32	11	0.02	10	0.16	13	0.47	37	0.17	4	0.28
Poblocka 1999		68	0.15	73	0.00	78	0.02	82	0.02	81	0.03	81	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932		8	0.32	17	0.01	15	0.09	14	0.47	64	0.05	14	0.15
Rachmaninoff 1923		78	0.10	37	0.00	55	0.06	51	0.06	87	0.02	64	0.03
Rangell 2001		54	0.19	82	0.00	42	0.08	38	0.20	79	0.02	45	0.06
Richter 1976		14	0.28	32	0.00	19	0.08	29	0.31	78	0.04	26	0.11
Rosen 1989		5	0.32	5	0.03	11	0.11	17	0.42	69	0.04	19	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		86	0.04	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.10	74	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	71	0.04	57	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.11	65	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		63	0.17	88	0.00	64	0.06	49	0.06	77	0.03	62	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.10	58	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03
Rossi 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.18	28	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.16	85	0.02	43	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		12	0.30	12	0.01	9	0.14	8	0.57	68	0.04	15	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		31	0.24	34	0.00	30	0.09	20	0.39	73	0.03	28	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		37	0.23	51	0.00	60	0.06	50	0.06	86	0.02	67	0.03
Shebanova 2002		34	0.23	46	0.00	49	0.06	52	0.06	80	0.04	50	0.05
Smith 1975		30	0.24	40	0.00	50	0.05	56	0.05	77	0.03	53	0.04
Sokolov 2002		43	0.22	47	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	74	0.03	46	0.05
Sztompka 1959		23	0.25	64	0.00	36	0.08	32	0.28	73	0.04	27	0.11
Tomsic 1995		33	0.24	35	0.00	43	0.08	41	0.18	72	0.04	40	0.08
Uninsky 1932		49	0.21	29	0.00	17	0.09	15	0.46	83	0.03	22	0.12
Uninsky 1971		19	0.26	48	0.00	33	0.08	44	0.14	86	0.02	49	0.05
Wasowski 1980		48	0.21	71	0.00	44	0.10	39	0.20	58	0.05	31	0.10
Zak 1937		42	0.22	39	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.33	68	0.04	25	0.11
Zak 1951		39	0.22	6	0.02	27	0.06	21	0.37	78	0.04	21	0.12
Random 1		89	-0.04	42	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	40	0.11	70	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.05	61	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	33	0.19	44	0.06
Random 3		88	0.00	16	0.01	79	0.02	84	0.02	7	0.48	34	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).