Rosenthal 1931d

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.35	19	0.00	9	0.22	8	0.70	16	0.50	8	0.59
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.23	35	0.00	33	0.06	32	0.23	65	0.04	28	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.22	26	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.14	73	0.05	38	0.08
Bacha 2000		23	0.26	72	0.00	23	0.09	26	0.30	52	0.05	22	0.12
Badura 1965		51	0.21	79	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	59	0.04	59	0.04
Barbosa 1983		53	0.20	80	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	85	0.02	75	0.03
Biret 1990		38	0.24	53	0.00	31	0.06	39	0.15	73	0.04	39	0.08
Blet 2003		47	0.22	27	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.24	68	0.04	29	0.10
Block 1995		58	0.20	67	0.00	52	0.05	60	0.05	78	0.03	60	0.04
Blumental 1952		13	0.31	10	0.00	10	0.29	11	0.57	38	0.20	11	0.34
Boshniakovich 1969		59	0.20	68	0.00	67	0.04	62	0.04	85	0.04	61	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		5	0.39	54	0.00	7	0.24	6	0.75	18	0.58	6	0.66
Bunin 1987		32	0.24	56	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	73	0.03	62	0.04
Bunin 1987b		33	0.24	9	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.04	53	0.04
Chiu 1999		66	0.19	87	0.00	55	0.05	50	0.05	82	0.03	51	0.04
Cohen 1997		27	0.26	69	0.00	19	0.09	18	0.43	40	0.22	12	0.31
Cortot 1951		25	0.26	22	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.30	40	0.15	14	0.21
Csalog 1996		65	0.19	61	0.00	63	0.04	72	0.04	80	0.03	76	0.03
Czerny 1949		43	0.22	33	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.13	58	0.05	37	0.08
Czerny 1990		62	0.19	45	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	57	0.05	63	0.04
Duchoud 2007		85	0.10	81	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.04	79	0.03
Ezaki 2006		8	0.36	12	0.00	8	0.20	9	0.69	37	0.35	10	0.49
Falvay 1989		14	0.31	28	0.00	16	0.18	15	0.50	57	0.05	18	0.16
Farrell 1958		69	0.18	49	0.00	69	0.04	74	0.04	87	0.02	69	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		7	0.36	23	0.00	11	0.23	10	0.69	11	0.71	5	0.70
Fliere 1977		34	0.24	43	0.00	34	0.09	30	0.26	87	0.03	31	0.09
Fou 1978		19	0.28	73	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.43	78	0.03	25	0.11
Francois 1956		39	0.23	39	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.31	41	0.15	13	0.22
Friedman 1923		63	0.19	62	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		64	0.19	82	0.00	65	0.06	48	0.06	77	0.04	48	0.05
Friedman 1930		77	0.15	83	0.00	68	0.06	47	0.06	76	0.03	58	0.04
Garcia 2007		68	0.18	40	0.00	77	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.03	80	0.03
Garcia 2007b		78	0.15	20	0.00	71	0.04	71	0.04	84	0.02	83	0.03
Gierzod 1998		11	0.33	46	0.00	12	0.14	17	0.47	48	0.07	15	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		44	0.22	5	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.30	83	0.03	35	0.09
Groot 1988		16	0.29	50	0.00	14	0.13	13	0.54	70	0.04	20	0.15
Harasiewicz 1955		52	0.21	74	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.17	87	0.02	45	0.06
Hatto 1993		42	0.23	57	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	84	0.03	64	0.04
Hatto 1997		18	0.28	44	0.00	22	0.09	22	0.38	69	0.04	24	0.12
Horowitz 1949		60	0.19	42	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	61	0.04	56	0.04
Indjic 1988		49	0.22	70	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	86	0.03	74	0.03
Kapell 1951		67	0.18	51	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	85	0.03	70	0.03
Kissin 1993		86	0.09	58	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.02
Kushner 1989		30	0.25	63	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	76	0.04	47	0.05
Luisada 1991		29	0.25	29	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	73	0.04	40	0.07
Lushtak 2004		37	0.24	30	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.16	80	0.03	43	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.26	47	0.00	30	0.07	28	0.29	84	0.03	33	0.09
Magaloff 1978		26	0.26	37	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.27	79	0.03	32	0.09
Magin 1975		76	0.16	31	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.03	68	0.03
Michalowski 1933		80	0.13	21	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.03
Milkina 1970		36	0.24	24	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.17	78	0.03	41	0.07
Mohovich 1999		15	0.30	16	0.00	15	0.16	12	0.56	61	0.04	19	0.15
Moravec 1969		12	0.33	75	0.00	13	0.21	14	0.52	59	0.05	17	0.16
Morozova 2008		31	0.25	25	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.15	79	0.03	42	0.07
Neighaus 1950		70	0.18	17	0.00	72	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.03	82	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		61	0.19	71	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.17	74	0.04	36	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		71	0.18	84	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	83	0.03	57	0.04
Osinska 1989		45	0.22	18	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	83	0.03	49	0.04
Pachmann 1927		87	0.09	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.03	88	0.02
Paderewski 1930		81	0.12	59	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		73	0.17	64	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		74	0.17	11	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.03	86	0.02
Poblocka 1999		56	0.20	89	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	82	0.03	50	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		6	0.37	7	0.00	5	0.32	5	0.76	16	0.55	7	0.65
Rachmaninoff 1923		10	0.35	6	0.00	6	0.22	7	0.74	21	0.41	9	0.55
Rangell 2001		55	0.20	13	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	84	0.02	81	0.03
Richter 1976		82	0.11	85	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.03	87	0.02
Rosen 1989		17	0.28	65	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.42	80	0.03	27	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.59	4	0.00	4	0.81	4	0.91	4	0.88	4	0.89
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.76	2	0.08	2	0.87	2	0.98	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.83	1	0.89	1	0.88	1	0.99	2	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.71	3	0.02	3	0.88	3	0.97	2	0.95	3	0.96
Rosenthal 1931d		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rossi 2007		84	0.10	34	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03	67	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		20	0.28	8	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.34	45	0.06	21	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.22	15	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	86	0.03	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		22	0.26	38	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.13	74	0.03	44	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.24	36	0.00	29	0.06	33	0.23	49	0.06	23	0.12
Shebanova 2002		79	0.13	90	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.03	78	0.03
Smith 1975		24	0.26	32	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.49	50	0.06	16	0.17
Sokolov 2002		57	0.20	14	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.12	85	0.02	46	0.05
Sztompka 1959		75	0.17	86	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.03
Tomsic 1995		54	0.20	60	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	80	0.04	55	0.04
Uninsky 1932		72	0.17	48	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Uninsky 1971		21	0.27	52	0.00	20	0.09	21	0.41	83	0.03	26	0.11
Wasowski 1980		83	0.11	55	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.03	85	0.02
Zak 1937		50	0.22	76	0.00	59	0.05	56	0.05	79	0.04	52	0.04
Zak 1951		41	0.23	77	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	77	0.04	54	0.04
Random 1		89	0.02	66	0.00	86	0.02	89	0.02	2	0.51	30	0.10
Random 2		88	0.07	78	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	8	0.45	34	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.09	41	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	74	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).